Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity

The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City

Amy M. Lerner, Hallie Eakin, Elizabeth Tellman, Julia Chrissie Bausch, Bertha Hernández Aguilar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Megacities are socio-ecological systems (SES) that encompass complex interactions between residents, institutions, and natural resource management. These interactions are exacerbated by climate change as resources such as water become scarce or hazardous through drought and flooding. In order to develop pathways for improved sustainability, the disparate factors that create vulnerable conditions and outcomes must be visible to decision-makers. Nevertheless, for such decision-makers to manage vulnerability effectively, they need to define the salient boundaries of the urban SES, and the relevant biophysical, technological, and socio-institutional attributes that play critical roles in vulnerability dynamics. Here we explore the problem of hydrological risk in Mexico City, where vulnerabilities to flooding and water scarcity are interconnected temporally and spatially, yet the formal and informal institutions and actors involved in the production and management of vulnerability are divided into two discrete problem domains: land-use planning and water resource management. We analyze interviews with city officials working in both domains to understand their different perspectives on the dynamics of socio-hydrological risk, including flooding and water scarcity. We find governance gaps within land-use planning and water management that lead to hydro-social risk, stemming from a failure to address informal institutions that exacerbate vulnerability to flooding and water scarcity. Mandates in both sectors are overlapping and confusing, while socio-hydrological risk is externalized to the informal domain, making it ungoverned. Integrated water management approaches that recognize and incorporate informality are needed to reduce vulnerability to water scarcity and flooding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCities
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

megacity
land use planning
vulnerability
Mexico
land use
governance
flooding
water
planning
ecological system
water management
decision maker
management
interaction
drought
resources
city
Water governance
Vulnerability
Land use planning

Keywords

  • Hydrological risk
  • Informality
  • Mexico City
  • Urban water governance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity : The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City. / Lerner, Amy M.; Eakin, Hallie; Tellman, Elizabeth; Bausch, Julia Chrissie; Hernández Aguilar, Bertha.

In: Cities, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lerner, Amy M. ; Eakin, Hallie ; Tellman, Elizabeth ; Bausch, Julia Chrissie ; Hernández Aguilar, Bertha. / Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity : The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City. In: Cities. 2018.
@article{6520ac14316b442a817405db74ec62c6,
title = "Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity: The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City",
abstract = "Megacities are socio-ecological systems (SES) that encompass complex interactions between residents, institutions, and natural resource management. These interactions are exacerbated by climate change as resources such as water become scarce or hazardous through drought and flooding. In order to develop pathways for improved sustainability, the disparate factors that create vulnerable conditions and outcomes must be visible to decision-makers. Nevertheless, for such decision-makers to manage vulnerability effectively, they need to define the salient boundaries of the urban SES, and the relevant biophysical, technological, and socio-institutional attributes that play critical roles in vulnerability dynamics. Here we explore the problem of hydrological risk in Mexico City, where vulnerabilities to flooding and water scarcity are interconnected temporally and spatially, yet the formal and informal institutions and actors involved in the production and management of vulnerability are divided into two discrete problem domains: land-use planning and water resource management. We analyze interviews with city officials working in both domains to understand their different perspectives on the dynamics of socio-hydrological risk, including flooding and water scarcity. We find governance gaps within land-use planning and water management that lead to hydro-social risk, stemming from a failure to address informal institutions that exacerbate vulnerability to flooding and water scarcity. Mandates in both sectors are overlapping and confusing, while socio-hydrological risk is externalized to the informal domain, making it ungoverned. Integrated water management approaches that recognize and incorporate informality are needed to reduce vulnerability to water scarcity and flooding.",
keywords = "Hydrological risk, Informality, Mexico City, Urban water governance",
author = "Lerner, {Amy M.} and Hallie Eakin and Elizabeth Tellman and Bausch, {Julia Chrissie} and {Hern{\'a}ndez Aguilar}, Bertha",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.009",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Cities",
issn = "0264-2751",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity

T2 - The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City

AU - Lerner, Amy M.

AU - Eakin, Hallie

AU - Tellman, Elizabeth

AU - Bausch, Julia Chrissie

AU - Hernández Aguilar, Bertha

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Megacities are socio-ecological systems (SES) that encompass complex interactions between residents, institutions, and natural resource management. These interactions are exacerbated by climate change as resources such as water become scarce or hazardous through drought and flooding. In order to develop pathways for improved sustainability, the disparate factors that create vulnerable conditions and outcomes must be visible to decision-makers. Nevertheless, for such decision-makers to manage vulnerability effectively, they need to define the salient boundaries of the urban SES, and the relevant biophysical, technological, and socio-institutional attributes that play critical roles in vulnerability dynamics. Here we explore the problem of hydrological risk in Mexico City, where vulnerabilities to flooding and water scarcity are interconnected temporally and spatially, yet the formal and informal institutions and actors involved in the production and management of vulnerability are divided into two discrete problem domains: land-use planning and water resource management. We analyze interviews with city officials working in both domains to understand their different perspectives on the dynamics of socio-hydrological risk, including flooding and water scarcity. We find governance gaps within land-use planning and water management that lead to hydro-social risk, stemming from a failure to address informal institutions that exacerbate vulnerability to flooding and water scarcity. Mandates in both sectors are overlapping and confusing, while socio-hydrological risk is externalized to the informal domain, making it ungoverned. Integrated water management approaches that recognize and incorporate informality are needed to reduce vulnerability to water scarcity and flooding.

AB - Megacities are socio-ecological systems (SES) that encompass complex interactions between residents, institutions, and natural resource management. These interactions are exacerbated by climate change as resources such as water become scarce or hazardous through drought and flooding. In order to develop pathways for improved sustainability, the disparate factors that create vulnerable conditions and outcomes must be visible to decision-makers. Nevertheless, for such decision-makers to manage vulnerability effectively, they need to define the salient boundaries of the urban SES, and the relevant biophysical, technological, and socio-institutional attributes that play critical roles in vulnerability dynamics. Here we explore the problem of hydrological risk in Mexico City, where vulnerabilities to flooding and water scarcity are interconnected temporally and spatially, yet the formal and informal institutions and actors involved in the production and management of vulnerability are divided into two discrete problem domains: land-use planning and water resource management. We analyze interviews with city officials working in both domains to understand their different perspectives on the dynamics of socio-hydrological risk, including flooding and water scarcity. We find governance gaps within land-use planning and water management that lead to hydro-social risk, stemming from a failure to address informal institutions that exacerbate vulnerability to flooding and water scarcity. Mandates in both sectors are overlapping and confusing, while socio-hydrological risk is externalized to the informal domain, making it ungoverned. Integrated water management approaches that recognize and incorporate informality are needed to reduce vulnerability to water scarcity and flooding.

KW - Hydrological risk

KW - Informality

KW - Mexico City

KW - Urban water governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048707973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048707973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.009

M3 - Article

JO - Cities

JF - Cities

SN - 0264-2751

ER -