Governance in transboundary conservation

How institutional structure and path dependence matter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transboundary protected areas (TBPAs) have gained currency over the past decade because of their perceived (and highly disputed) effectiveness at achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. However, few studies have analysed how institutional structures influence cross-border coordination across a range of issues in a transboundary park. This study uses two TBPAs in southern Africa-the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park-to look at issues of international governance in transboundary conservation. The bottom-up institutional development in the Kgalagadi has allowed ground-level officials to learn how to work together to adapt and respond to the day-to-day challenges they confront. By contrast, local-level collaboration in the Great Limpopo has emerged slowly due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials. The central premise is that the institutional beginnings to the two TBPAs result in differing capacities for effective collaboration. Initial institutional design also creates path dependencies, which may be difficult to overcome later. These findings can help practitioners in designing more robust, long-enduring institutions to better achieve their goals in future transboundary conservation projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)420-428
Number of pages9
JournalConservation and Society
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

governance
protected area
conservation areas
institutional development
currency
regional economics
economic development
Southern Africa
biodiversity
institutional structure

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • governance
  • Great Limpopo
  • institutional development
  • institutions
  • Kgalagadi
  • path dependency
  • transboundary conservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Governance in transboundary conservation : How institutional structure and path dependence matter. / Schoon, Michael.

In: Conservation and Society, Vol. 11, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 420-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{522ff2344803463eb7bce4e37d03f898,
title = "Governance in transboundary conservation: How institutional structure and path dependence matter",
abstract = "Transboundary protected areas (TBPAs) have gained currency over the past decade because of their perceived (and highly disputed) effectiveness at achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. However, few studies have analysed how institutional structures influence cross-border coordination across a range of issues in a transboundary park. This study uses two TBPAs in southern Africa-the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park-to look at issues of international governance in transboundary conservation. The bottom-up institutional development in the Kgalagadi has allowed ground-level officials to learn how to work together to adapt and respond to the day-to-day challenges they confront. By contrast, local-level collaboration in the Great Limpopo has emerged slowly due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials. The central premise is that the institutional beginnings to the two TBPAs result in differing capacities for effective collaboration. Initial institutional design also creates path dependencies, which may be difficult to overcome later. These findings can help practitioners in designing more robust, long-enduring institutions to better achieve their goals in future transboundary conservation projects.",
keywords = "collaboration, governance, Great Limpopo, institutional development, institutions, Kgalagadi, path dependency, transboundary conservation",
author = "Michael Schoon",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.4103/0972-4923.125758",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "420--428",
journal = "Conservation and Society",
issn = "0972-4923",
publisher = "Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance in transboundary conservation

T2 - How institutional structure and path dependence matter

AU - Schoon, Michael

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Transboundary protected areas (TBPAs) have gained currency over the past decade because of their perceived (and highly disputed) effectiveness at achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. However, few studies have analysed how institutional structures influence cross-border coordination across a range of issues in a transboundary park. This study uses two TBPAs in southern Africa-the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park-to look at issues of international governance in transboundary conservation. The bottom-up institutional development in the Kgalagadi has allowed ground-level officials to learn how to work together to adapt and respond to the day-to-day challenges they confront. By contrast, local-level collaboration in the Great Limpopo has emerged slowly due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials. The central premise is that the institutional beginnings to the two TBPAs result in differing capacities for effective collaboration. Initial institutional design also creates path dependencies, which may be difficult to overcome later. These findings can help practitioners in designing more robust, long-enduring institutions to better achieve their goals in future transboundary conservation projects.

AB - Transboundary protected areas (TBPAs) have gained currency over the past decade because of their perceived (and highly disputed) effectiveness at achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. However, few studies have analysed how institutional structures influence cross-border coordination across a range of issues in a transboundary park. This study uses two TBPAs in southern Africa-the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park-to look at issues of international governance in transboundary conservation. The bottom-up institutional development in the Kgalagadi has allowed ground-level officials to learn how to work together to adapt and respond to the day-to-day challenges they confront. By contrast, local-level collaboration in the Great Limpopo has emerged slowly due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials. The central premise is that the institutional beginnings to the two TBPAs result in differing capacities for effective collaboration. Initial institutional design also creates path dependencies, which may be difficult to overcome later. These findings can help practitioners in designing more robust, long-enduring institutions to better achieve their goals in future transboundary conservation projects.

KW - collaboration

KW - governance

KW - Great Limpopo

KW - institutional development

KW - institutions

KW - Kgalagadi

KW - path dependency

KW - transboundary conservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893756867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893756867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0972-4923.125758

DO - 10.4103/0972-4923.125758

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 420

EP - 428

JO - Conservation and Society

JF - Conservation and Society

SN - 0972-4923

IS - 4

ER -