Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems

Louis Lebel, John Anderies, Bruce Campbell, Carl Folke, Steve Hatfield-Dodds, Terry P. Hughes, James Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

591 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number19
JournalEcology and Society
Volume11
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

sustainability
social organization
regional development
stakeholder
innovation
ecosystem
society
participation
goods and services
world
distribution
attribute

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Adaptive capacity
  • Deliberation
  • Governance
  • Institutions
  • Multilayered institutions
  • Participation
  • Polycentric institutions
  • Resilience
  • Social justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Lebel, L., Anderies, J., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), [19].

Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. / Lebel, Louis; Anderies, John; Campbell, Bruce; Folke, Carl; Hatfield-Dodds, Steve; Hughes, Terry P.; Wilson, James.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 11, No. 1, 19, 06.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lebel, L, Anderies, J, Campbell, B, Folke, C, Hatfield-Dodds, S, Hughes, TP & Wilson, J 2006, 'Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems', Ecology and Society, vol. 11, no. 1, 19.
Lebel L, Anderies J, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP et al. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society. 2006 Jun;11(1). 19.
Lebel, Louis ; Anderies, John ; Campbell, Bruce ; Folke, Carl ; Hatfield-Dodds, Steve ; Hughes, Terry P. ; Wilson, James. / Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. In: Ecology and Society. 2006 ; Vol. 11, No. 1.
@article{d77e2330f9354d6b99fe55562416ef51,
title = "Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems",
abstract = "The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?",
keywords = "Accountability, Adaptive capacity, Deliberation, Governance, Institutions, Multilayered institutions, Participation, Polycentric institutions, Resilience, Social justice",
author = "Louis Lebel and John Anderies and Bruce Campbell and Carl Folke and Steve Hatfield-Dodds and Hughes, {Terry P.} and James Wilson",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems

AU - Lebel, Louis

AU - Anderies, John

AU - Campbell, Bruce

AU - Folke, Carl

AU - Hatfield-Dodds, Steve

AU - Hughes, Terry P.

AU - Wilson, James

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?

AB - The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?

KW - Accountability

KW - Adaptive capacity

KW - Deliberation

KW - Governance

KW - Institutions

KW - Multilayered institutions

KW - Participation

KW - Polycentric institutions

KW - Resilience

KW - Social justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745888401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745888401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 1

M1 - 19

ER -