Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: More evidence on frequent assertions about differences

Gerald Lan, Hal G. Rainey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    135 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This study reports findings from a survey of managers in public, private, and hybrid organizations. The results augment the evidence about some of .the most frequent assertions about differences among those types of organizations. Public managers perceive more emphasis on rules, channels, and procedures, and more constraints on authority. Contrary to numerous assertions in the literature, however, the public managers perceive greater clarity of organizational goals and greater effectiveness in achieving those goals. One interpretation of these perceptions about goals holds that public managers say their goals are clear because they choose rule adherence as their main goal. The evidence presented refutes this inteipretation. On most of the dependent variables in the study, hybrid organization managers report perceptions distinctive from, and often intermediate between, the other two groups.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)5-28
    Number of pages24
    JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
    Volume2
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Public Administration
    • Marketing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: More evidence on frequent assertions about differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this