Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance

Jennifer Craig, D. Scott DeRue, John R. Hollenbeck, Matthias Spitzmuller, Dustin K. Jundt, Daniel R. Ilgen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general "do your best" learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general "do your best" learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general "do your best" learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-21
Number of pages10
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume122
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Learning
Goal setting
Research
Task complexity

Keywords

  • Goal-setting
  • Team performance
  • Team processes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Goal setting in teams : The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance. / Craig, Jennifer; DeRue, D. Scott; Hollenbeck, John R.; Spitzmuller, Matthias; Jundt, Dustin K.; Ilgen, Daniel R.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 122, No. 1, 09.2013, p. 12-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Craig, Jennifer ; DeRue, D. Scott ; Hollenbeck, John R. ; Spitzmuller, Matthias ; Jundt, Dustin K. ; Ilgen, Daniel R. / Goal setting in teams : The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2013 ; Vol. 122, No. 1. pp. 12-21.
@article{4abddb9e1ff94234a4a6aec417bb241e,
title = "Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance",
abstract = "This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general {"}do your best{"} learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general {"}do your best{"} learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general {"}do your best{"} learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.",
keywords = "Goal-setting, Team performance, Team processes",
author = "Jennifer Craig and DeRue, {D. Scott} and Hollenbeck, {John R.} and Matthias Spitzmuller and Jundt, {Dustin K.} and Ilgen, {Daniel R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "12--21",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Goal setting in teams

T2 - The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance

AU - Craig, Jennifer

AU - DeRue, D. Scott

AU - Hollenbeck, John R.

AU - Spitzmuller, Matthias

AU - Jundt, Dustin K.

AU - Ilgen, Daniel R.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general "do your best" learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general "do your best" learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general "do your best" learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.

AB - This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general "do your best" learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general "do your best" learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general "do your best" learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.

KW - Goal-setting

KW - Team performance

KW - Team processes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877033030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877033030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877033030

VL - 122

SP - 12

EP - 21

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -