Go Grrrls: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Gender-Specific Intervention to Reduce Sexual Risk Factors in Middle School Females

Craig Lecroy, Jenny McCullough Cosgrove, Katie Stalker, Marie Fordney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. Adolescent females continue to face health consequences associated with risky sexual behaviors such as unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a gender-specific intervention targeted to early adolescent females. Method. This study used an intent to treat randomized clinical trial comparing a broad-based female empowerment curriculum with a dose-matched science and technology female leadership curriculum. The sample (N = 801) was recruited from schools and was implemented in community-based settings mostly in an after school context. Assessments were conducted at baseline, postintervention, 6-, and 18-month follow-up time periods. Results. Both groups in the study obtained good implementation and engagement. The average attendance rate was 81% of program sessions. There were significant differences between the two groups favoring the intervention group on measures of sexually transmitted disease knowledge and condom technical skills. On a measure of condom self-efficacy, there was a significant trend. At the postassessment, there was a significant difference on the intentions to reduce sexual risk behaviors. Both the intervention and control groups made gains on the self-assertive behavior scale. Conclusions. Gender-specific programs for early adolescent females can help reduce indicators that are related to sexual risk reduction. More long-term follow-up is needed to assess impact on sexual behaviors. Efforts directed at a younger population of females should continue to be researched for potential in reducing sexual risks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-294
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Education and Behavior
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sexual Behavior
Randomized Controlled Trials
Condoms
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Curriculum
Self Efficacy
Risk Reduction Behavior
Risk-Taking
Technology
Pregnancy
Control Groups
Health
Population
Middle School
Risk Factors
Sexual
Randomized Controlled Trial
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • adolescence
  • adolescent health
  • clinical trial
  • health protective behavior
  • outcome evaluation
  • school-based evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Go Grrrls : A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Gender-Specific Intervention to Reduce Sexual Risk Factors in Middle School Females. / Lecroy, Craig; McCullough Cosgrove, Jenny; Stalker, Katie; Fordney, Marie.

In: Health Education and Behavior, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 286-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{913b515c47b44f45ad5c3a45ff1dadda,
title = "Go Grrrls: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Gender-Specific Intervention to Reduce Sexual Risk Factors in Middle School Females",
abstract = "Purpose. Adolescent females continue to face health consequences associated with risky sexual behaviors such as unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a gender-specific intervention targeted to early adolescent females. Method. This study used an intent to treat randomized clinical trial comparing a broad-based female empowerment curriculum with a dose-matched science and technology female leadership curriculum. The sample (N = 801) was recruited from schools and was implemented in community-based settings mostly in an after school context. Assessments were conducted at baseline, postintervention, 6-, and 18-month follow-up time periods. Results. Both groups in the study obtained good implementation and engagement. The average attendance rate was 81{\%} of program sessions. There were significant differences between the two groups favoring the intervention group on measures of sexually transmitted disease knowledge and condom technical skills. On a measure of condom self-efficacy, there was a significant trend. At the postassessment, there was a significant difference on the intentions to reduce sexual risk behaviors. Both the intervention and control groups made gains on the self-assertive behavior scale. Conclusions. Gender-specific programs for early adolescent females can help reduce indicators that are related to sexual risk reduction. More long-term follow-up is needed to assess impact on sexual behaviors. Efforts directed at a younger population of females should continue to be researched for potential in reducing sexual risks.",
keywords = "adolescence, adolescent health, clinical trial, health protective behavior, outcome evaluation, school-based evaluation",
author = "Craig Lecroy and {McCullough Cosgrove}, Jenny and Katie Stalker and Marie Fordney",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1090198117715667",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "286--294",
journal = "Health Education and Behavior",
issn = "1090-1981",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Go Grrrls

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Gender-Specific Intervention to Reduce Sexual Risk Factors in Middle School Females

AU - Lecroy, Craig

AU - McCullough Cosgrove, Jenny

AU - Stalker, Katie

AU - Fordney, Marie

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Purpose. Adolescent females continue to face health consequences associated with risky sexual behaviors such as unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a gender-specific intervention targeted to early adolescent females. Method. This study used an intent to treat randomized clinical trial comparing a broad-based female empowerment curriculum with a dose-matched science and technology female leadership curriculum. The sample (N = 801) was recruited from schools and was implemented in community-based settings mostly in an after school context. Assessments were conducted at baseline, postintervention, 6-, and 18-month follow-up time periods. Results. Both groups in the study obtained good implementation and engagement. The average attendance rate was 81% of program sessions. There were significant differences between the two groups favoring the intervention group on measures of sexually transmitted disease knowledge and condom technical skills. On a measure of condom self-efficacy, there was a significant trend. At the postassessment, there was a significant difference on the intentions to reduce sexual risk behaviors. Both the intervention and control groups made gains on the self-assertive behavior scale. Conclusions. Gender-specific programs for early adolescent females can help reduce indicators that are related to sexual risk reduction. More long-term follow-up is needed to assess impact on sexual behaviors. Efforts directed at a younger population of females should continue to be researched for potential in reducing sexual risks.

AB - Purpose. Adolescent females continue to face health consequences associated with risky sexual behaviors such as unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a gender-specific intervention targeted to early adolescent females. Method. This study used an intent to treat randomized clinical trial comparing a broad-based female empowerment curriculum with a dose-matched science and technology female leadership curriculum. The sample (N = 801) was recruited from schools and was implemented in community-based settings mostly in an after school context. Assessments were conducted at baseline, postintervention, 6-, and 18-month follow-up time periods. Results. Both groups in the study obtained good implementation and engagement. The average attendance rate was 81% of program sessions. There were significant differences between the two groups favoring the intervention group on measures of sexually transmitted disease knowledge and condom technical skills. On a measure of condom self-efficacy, there was a significant trend. At the postassessment, there was a significant difference on the intentions to reduce sexual risk behaviors. Both the intervention and control groups made gains on the self-assertive behavior scale. Conclusions. Gender-specific programs for early adolescent females can help reduce indicators that are related to sexual risk reduction. More long-term follow-up is needed to assess impact on sexual behaviors. Efforts directed at a younger population of females should continue to be researched for potential in reducing sexual risks.

KW - adolescence

KW - adolescent health

KW - clinical trial

KW - health protective behavior

KW - outcome evaluation

KW - school-based evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044370163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044370163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1090198117715667

DO - 10.1177/1090198117715667

M3 - Article

C2 - 28770631

AN - SCOPUS:85044370163

VL - 45

SP - 286

EP - 294

JO - Health Education and Behavior

JF - Health Education and Behavior

SN - 1090-1981

IS - 2

ER -