Global Spatial–Temporal Variability in Terrestrial Productivity and Phenology Regimes between 2000 and 2012

Shanley D. Thompson, Trisalyn Nelson, Nicholas C. Coops, Michael A. Wulder, Trevor C. Lantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The productivity and phenology of vegetation are spatially and temporally variable ecosystem functions. Monitoring spatial–temporal patterns in these functions can improve our understanding of global change and natural ecosystem variability and inform management actions. Researchers typically focus on temporal changes within or among static regions and omit dynamics of spatial configuration. Our goal was to assess global spatial–temporal variability in productivity and phenology regimes between 2000 and 2012 using a temporally dynamic functional type classification. Fourteen functional types were defined for each year by clustering the annual sum and annual variability (seasonality) of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR)—a biophysical proxy for vegetation greenness or productivity—from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). The fourteen functional types ranged from tundra (low cumulative fPAR and highly seasonal) to tropical forests (high cumulative fPAR and low seasonality). Variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics and in two spatial pattern metrics was assessed for each functional type. Many pixels changed from one cluster to another then back again, suggesting considerable short-term variability. Temporal variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics was relatively low, with changes instead primarily manifested in spatial pattern. Spatial pattern was most variable within tundra, grasslands, shrublands, and savannas. A dynamic classification demonstrated the variability in spatial patterns of primary productivity and can be used for future monitoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalAnnals of the American Association of Geographers
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 11 2017

Fingerprint

photosynthetically active radiation
phenology
productivity
regime
tundra
seasonality
vegetation
shrubland
monitoring
ecosystem function
global change
savanna
tropical forest
MODIS
pixel
grassland
ecosystem
management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Global Spatial–Temporal Variability in Terrestrial Productivity and Phenology Regimes between 2000 and 2012. / Thompson, Shanley D.; Nelson, Trisalyn; Coops, Nicholas C.; Wulder, Michael A.; Lantz, Trevor C.

In: Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 11.05.2017, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c384be8f2244544b7647eec54aee766,
title = "Global Spatial–Temporal Variability in Terrestrial Productivity and Phenology Regimes between 2000 and 2012",
abstract = "The productivity and phenology of vegetation are spatially and temporally variable ecosystem functions. Monitoring spatial–temporal patterns in these functions can improve our understanding of global change and natural ecosystem variability and inform management actions. Researchers typically focus on temporal changes within or among static regions and omit dynamics of spatial configuration. Our goal was to assess global spatial–temporal variability in productivity and phenology regimes between 2000 and 2012 using a temporally dynamic functional type classification. Fourteen functional types were defined for each year by clustering the annual sum and annual variability (seasonality) of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR)—a biophysical proxy for vegetation greenness or productivity—from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). The fourteen functional types ranged from tundra (low cumulative fPAR and highly seasonal) to tropical forests (high cumulative fPAR and low seasonality). Variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics and in two spatial pattern metrics was assessed for each functional type. Many pixels changed from one cluster to another then back again, suggesting considerable short-term variability. Temporal variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics was relatively low, with changes instead primarily manifested in spatial pattern. Spatial pattern was most variable within tundra, grasslands, shrublands, and savannas. A dynamic classification demonstrated the variability in spatial patterns of primary productivity and can be used for future monitoring.",
author = "Thompson, {Shanley D.} and Trisalyn Nelson and Coops, {Nicholas C.} and Wulder, {Michael A.} and Lantz, {Trevor C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1080/24694452.2017.1309964",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Annals of the American Association of Geographers",
issn = "2469-4452",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global Spatial–Temporal Variability in Terrestrial Productivity and Phenology Regimes between 2000 and 2012

AU - Thompson, Shanley D.

AU - Nelson, Trisalyn

AU - Coops, Nicholas C.

AU - Wulder, Michael A.

AU - Lantz, Trevor C.

PY - 2017/5/11

Y1 - 2017/5/11

N2 - The productivity and phenology of vegetation are spatially and temporally variable ecosystem functions. Monitoring spatial–temporal patterns in these functions can improve our understanding of global change and natural ecosystem variability and inform management actions. Researchers typically focus on temporal changes within or among static regions and omit dynamics of spatial configuration. Our goal was to assess global spatial–temporal variability in productivity and phenology regimes between 2000 and 2012 using a temporally dynamic functional type classification. Fourteen functional types were defined for each year by clustering the annual sum and annual variability (seasonality) of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR)—a biophysical proxy for vegetation greenness or productivity—from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). The fourteen functional types ranged from tundra (low cumulative fPAR and highly seasonal) to tropical forests (high cumulative fPAR and low seasonality). Variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics and in two spatial pattern metrics was assessed for each functional type. Many pixels changed from one cluster to another then back again, suggesting considerable short-term variability. Temporal variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics was relatively low, with changes instead primarily manifested in spatial pattern. Spatial pattern was most variable within tundra, grasslands, shrublands, and savannas. A dynamic classification demonstrated the variability in spatial patterns of primary productivity and can be used for future monitoring.

AB - The productivity and phenology of vegetation are spatially and temporally variable ecosystem functions. Monitoring spatial–temporal patterns in these functions can improve our understanding of global change and natural ecosystem variability and inform management actions. Researchers typically focus on temporal changes within or among static regions and omit dynamics of spatial configuration. Our goal was to assess global spatial–temporal variability in productivity and phenology regimes between 2000 and 2012 using a temporally dynamic functional type classification. Fourteen functional types were defined for each year by clustering the annual sum and annual variability (seasonality) of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR)—a biophysical proxy for vegetation greenness or productivity—from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). The fourteen functional types ranged from tundra (low cumulative fPAR and highly seasonal) to tropical forests (high cumulative fPAR and low seasonality). Variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics and in two spatial pattern metrics was assessed for each functional type. Many pixels changed from one cluster to another then back again, suggesting considerable short-term variability. Temporal variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics was relatively low, with changes instead primarily manifested in spatial pattern. Spatial pattern was most variable within tundra, grasslands, shrublands, and savannas. A dynamic classification demonstrated the variability in spatial patterns of primary productivity and can be used for future monitoring.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018688869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018688869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2017.1309964

DO - 10.1080/24694452.2017.1309964

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018688869

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

SN - 2469-4452

ER -