Getting an empirical hold of the sustainable university: a comparative analysis of evaluation frameworks across 12 contemporary sustainability assessment tools

Daniel Fischer, Silke Jenssen, Valentin Tappeser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although it is increasingly recognised that higher education institutions have to play a critical role in the progression towards a sustainable development, the question of what fields and issues universities should attend to in their attempt to become more sustainable remains subject to debate. In recent years, sustainability assessment tools have begun to play a prominent role in strategies to reorient higher education institutions systematically and holistically towards sustainability. In the course of their further advancement, sustainability assessment tools have not only become instrumental facilitators of change processes towards sustainability, but also established implicit normative standards by framing the overall understanding of what fields and issues a sustainable university should engage with. So far, researchers in the field have paid little attention to the understandings of a sustainable university that are underpinning and informing sustainability assessment tools. This paper addresses this gap. Based on a comparative analysis of indicators and criteria, as well as introductory passages in supporting documents of twelve sustainability assessment tools, the authors sketch the dominance and marginalisation of different fields and issues. In doing so, the paper contributes to building the capacity for a more sophisticated and reflexive engagement with different approaches to assess and evaluate sustainability in higher education institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)785-800
Number of pages16
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 18 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sustainability
university
evaluation
education
sustainable development

Keywords

  • higher education for sustainable development
  • sustainability assessment tools
  • sustainable university
  • whole institution approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{9c8b986130a447a1aa339bc47f0b778f,
title = "Getting an empirical hold of the sustainable university: a comparative analysis of evaluation frameworks across 12 contemporary sustainability assessment tools",
abstract = "Although it is increasingly recognised that higher education institutions have to play a critical role in the progression towards a sustainable development, the question of what fields and issues universities should attend to in their attempt to become more sustainable remains subject to debate. In recent years, sustainability assessment tools have begun to play a prominent role in strategies to reorient higher education institutions systematically and holistically towards sustainability. In the course of their further advancement, sustainability assessment tools have not only become instrumental facilitators of change processes towards sustainability, but also established implicit normative standards by framing the overall understanding of what fields and issues a sustainable university should engage with. So far, researchers in the field have paid little attention to the understandings of a sustainable university that are underpinning and informing sustainability assessment tools. This paper addresses this gap. Based on a comparative analysis of indicators and criteria, as well as introductory passages in supporting documents of twelve sustainability assessment tools, the authors sketch the dominance and marginalisation of different fields and issues. In doing so, the paper contributes to building the capacity for a more sophisticated and reflexive engagement with different approaches to assess and evaluate sustainability in higher education institutions.",
keywords = "higher education for sustainable development, sustainability assessment tools, sustainable university, whole institution approach",
author = "Daniel Fischer and Silke Jenssen and Valentin Tappeser",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2015.1043234",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "785--800",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting an empirical hold of the sustainable university

T2 - a comparative analysis of evaluation frameworks across 12 contemporary sustainability assessment tools

AU - Fischer, Daniel

AU - Jenssen, Silke

AU - Tappeser, Valentin

PY - 2015/8/18

Y1 - 2015/8/18

N2 - Although it is increasingly recognised that higher education institutions have to play a critical role in the progression towards a sustainable development, the question of what fields and issues universities should attend to in their attempt to become more sustainable remains subject to debate. In recent years, sustainability assessment tools have begun to play a prominent role in strategies to reorient higher education institutions systematically and holistically towards sustainability. In the course of their further advancement, sustainability assessment tools have not only become instrumental facilitators of change processes towards sustainability, but also established implicit normative standards by framing the overall understanding of what fields and issues a sustainable university should engage with. So far, researchers in the field have paid little attention to the understandings of a sustainable university that are underpinning and informing sustainability assessment tools. This paper addresses this gap. Based on a comparative analysis of indicators and criteria, as well as introductory passages in supporting documents of twelve sustainability assessment tools, the authors sketch the dominance and marginalisation of different fields and issues. In doing so, the paper contributes to building the capacity for a more sophisticated and reflexive engagement with different approaches to assess and evaluate sustainability in higher education institutions.

AB - Although it is increasingly recognised that higher education institutions have to play a critical role in the progression towards a sustainable development, the question of what fields and issues universities should attend to in their attempt to become more sustainable remains subject to debate. In recent years, sustainability assessment tools have begun to play a prominent role in strategies to reorient higher education institutions systematically and holistically towards sustainability. In the course of their further advancement, sustainability assessment tools have not only become instrumental facilitators of change processes towards sustainability, but also established implicit normative standards by framing the overall understanding of what fields and issues a sustainable university should engage with. So far, researchers in the field have paid little attention to the understandings of a sustainable university that are underpinning and informing sustainability assessment tools. This paper addresses this gap. Based on a comparative analysis of indicators and criteria, as well as introductory passages in supporting documents of twelve sustainability assessment tools, the authors sketch the dominance and marginalisation of different fields and issues. In doing so, the paper contributes to building the capacity for a more sophisticated and reflexive engagement with different approaches to assess and evaluate sustainability in higher education institutions.

KW - higher education for sustainable development

KW - sustainability assessment tools

KW - sustainable university

KW - whole institution approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939270526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939270526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2015.1043234

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2015.1043234

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939270526

VL - 40

SP - 785

EP - 800

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

IS - 6

ER -