Genetic population structure accounts for contemporary ecogeographic patterns in tropic and subtropic-dwelling humans

Daniel Hruschka, Craig Hadley, Alexandra Slade, Christopher Stojanowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contemporary human populations conform to ecogeographic predictions that animals will become more compact in cooler climates and less compact in warmer ones. However, it remains unclear to what extent this pattern reflects plastic responses to current environments or genetic differences among populations. Analyzing anthropometric surveys of 232,684 children and adults from across 80 ethnolinguistic groups in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Americas, we confirm that body surface-to-volume correlates with contemporary temperature at magnitudes found in more latitudinally diverse samples (Adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.14-0.28). However, far more variation in body surface-to-volume is attributable to genetic population structure (Adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.50-0.74). Moreover, genetic population structure accounts for nearly all of the observed relationship between contemporary temperature and body surface-to-volume among children and adults. Indeed, after controlling for population structure, contemporary temperature accounts for no more than 4% of the variance in body form in these groups. This effect of genetic affinity on body form is also independent of other ecological variables, such as dominant mode of subsistence and household wealth per capita. These findings suggest that the observed fit of human body surface-to-volume with current climate in this sample reflects relatively large effects of existing genetic population structure of contemporary humans compared to plastic response to current environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0122301
JournalPLoS One
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 27 2015

Fingerprint

Tropics
Genetic Structures
subtropics
tropics
population structure
Climate
Plastics
Population
Temperature
Africa South of the Sahara
Body Temperature
Human Body
plastics
climate
temperature
Sub-Saharan Africa
Animals
coolers
human population
households

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Genetic population structure accounts for contemporary ecogeographic patterns in tropic and subtropic-dwelling humans. / Hruschka, Daniel; Hadley, Craig; Slade, Alexandra; Stojanowski, Christopher.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 3, e0122301, 27.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17cb8441712d46318cbd793945f359b6,
title = "Genetic population structure accounts for contemporary ecogeographic patterns in tropic and subtropic-dwelling humans",
abstract = "Contemporary human populations conform to ecogeographic predictions that animals will become more compact in cooler climates and less compact in warmer ones. However, it remains unclear to what extent this pattern reflects plastic responses to current environments or genetic differences among populations. Analyzing anthropometric surveys of 232,684 children and adults from across 80 ethnolinguistic groups in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Americas, we confirm that body surface-to-volume correlates with contemporary temperature at magnitudes found in more latitudinally diverse samples (Adj. R2 = 0.14-0.28). However, far more variation in body surface-to-volume is attributable to genetic population structure (Adj. R2 = 0.50-0.74). Moreover, genetic population structure accounts for nearly all of the observed relationship between contemporary temperature and body surface-to-volume among children and adults. Indeed, after controlling for population structure, contemporary temperature accounts for no more than 4{\%} of the variance in body form in these groups. This effect of genetic affinity on body form is also independent of other ecological variables, such as dominant mode of subsistence and household wealth per capita. These findings suggest that the observed fit of human body surface-to-volume with current climate in this sample reflects relatively large effects of existing genetic population structure of contemporary humans compared to plastic response to current environments.",
author = "Daniel Hruschka and Craig Hadley and Alexandra Slade and Christopher Stojanowski",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0122301",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic population structure accounts for contemporary ecogeographic patterns in tropic and subtropic-dwelling humans

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

AU - Hadley, Craig

AU - Slade, Alexandra

AU - Stojanowski, Christopher

PY - 2015/3/27

Y1 - 2015/3/27

N2 - Contemporary human populations conform to ecogeographic predictions that animals will become more compact in cooler climates and less compact in warmer ones. However, it remains unclear to what extent this pattern reflects plastic responses to current environments or genetic differences among populations. Analyzing anthropometric surveys of 232,684 children and adults from across 80 ethnolinguistic groups in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Americas, we confirm that body surface-to-volume correlates with contemporary temperature at magnitudes found in more latitudinally diverse samples (Adj. R2 = 0.14-0.28). However, far more variation in body surface-to-volume is attributable to genetic population structure (Adj. R2 = 0.50-0.74). Moreover, genetic population structure accounts for nearly all of the observed relationship between contemporary temperature and body surface-to-volume among children and adults. Indeed, after controlling for population structure, contemporary temperature accounts for no more than 4% of the variance in body form in these groups. This effect of genetic affinity on body form is also independent of other ecological variables, such as dominant mode of subsistence and household wealth per capita. These findings suggest that the observed fit of human body surface-to-volume with current climate in this sample reflects relatively large effects of existing genetic population structure of contemporary humans compared to plastic response to current environments.

AB - Contemporary human populations conform to ecogeographic predictions that animals will become more compact in cooler climates and less compact in warmer ones. However, it remains unclear to what extent this pattern reflects plastic responses to current environments or genetic differences among populations. Analyzing anthropometric surveys of 232,684 children and adults from across 80 ethnolinguistic groups in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Americas, we confirm that body surface-to-volume correlates with contemporary temperature at magnitudes found in more latitudinally diverse samples (Adj. R2 = 0.14-0.28). However, far more variation in body surface-to-volume is attributable to genetic population structure (Adj. R2 = 0.50-0.74). Moreover, genetic population structure accounts for nearly all of the observed relationship between contemporary temperature and body surface-to-volume among children and adults. Indeed, after controlling for population structure, contemporary temperature accounts for no more than 4% of the variance in body form in these groups. This effect of genetic affinity on body form is also independent of other ecological variables, such as dominant mode of subsistence and household wealth per capita. These findings suggest that the observed fit of human body surface-to-volume with current climate in this sample reflects relatively large effects of existing genetic population structure of contemporary humans compared to plastic response to current environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929493679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929493679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0122301

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0122301

M3 - Article

C2 - 25816235

AN - SCOPUS:84929493679

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0122301

ER -