Generating knowledge

a case study of the National Policing Improvement Agency program on systematic reviews in policing

Cody Telep, David Weisburd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To review what we have learned from the policing systematic reviews funded by the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) and to examine the importance of funding and influential individuals in advancing scientific knowledge.

Methods: We use the history of randomized experiments in criminology and policing to emphasize how influential individuals and funding agencies have played a key role in advancing science in particular areas. We focus on the impact the NPIA has had on dramatically increasing the number of policing systematic reviews and advancing knowledge about effective policing strategies.

Results: The nine completed Campbell reviews funded by the NPIA have more than doubled the number of Campbell Collaboration reviews related to policing and have increased our knowledge about a number of policing programs and strategies. Collectively, these reviews suggest a number of areas where the police can be successful in increasing fairness and effectiveness in policing.

Conclusions: Key individuals, particularly when connected to funding agencies, can have a major impact on the trajectory of scientific knowledge. The NPIA program on systematic reviews in policing demonstrates the influence dedicated funding can have on advancing our knowledge on important policing topics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-398
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Experimental Criminology
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 9 2014

Fingerprint

funding
criminology
fairness
knowledge
police
experiment
history
science

Keywords

  • Funding
  • Meta-analysis
  • National Policing Improvement Agency
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Generating knowledge : a case study of the National Policing Improvement Agency program on systematic reviews in policing. / Telep, Cody; Weisburd, David.

In: Journal of Experimental Criminology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 09.12.2014, p. 371-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6cac599c1caa47baad7e51fc248d9d7f,
title = "Generating knowledge: a case study of the National Policing Improvement Agency program on systematic reviews in policing",
abstract = "Objectives: To review what we have learned from the policing systematic reviews funded by the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) and to examine the importance of funding and influential individuals in advancing scientific knowledge.Methods: We use the history of randomized experiments in criminology and policing to emphasize how influential individuals and funding agencies have played a key role in advancing science in particular areas. We focus on the impact the NPIA has had on dramatically increasing the number of policing systematic reviews and advancing knowledge about effective policing strategies.Results: The nine completed Campbell reviews funded by the NPIA have more than doubled the number of Campbell Collaboration reviews related to policing and have increased our knowledge about a number of policing programs and strategies. Collectively, these reviews suggest a number of areas where the police can be successful in increasing fairness and effectiveness in policing.Conclusions: Key individuals, particularly when connected to funding agencies, can have a major impact on the trajectory of scientific knowledge. The NPIA program on systematic reviews in policing demonstrates the influence dedicated funding can have on advancing our knowledge on important policing topics.",
keywords = "Funding, Meta-analysis, National Policing Improvement Agency, Systematic review",
author = "Cody Telep and David Weisburd",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11292-014-9206-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "371--398",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Criminology",
issn = "1573-3750",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generating knowledge

T2 - a case study of the National Policing Improvement Agency program on systematic reviews in policing

AU - Telep, Cody

AU - Weisburd, David

PY - 2014/12/9

Y1 - 2014/12/9

N2 - Objectives: To review what we have learned from the policing systematic reviews funded by the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) and to examine the importance of funding and influential individuals in advancing scientific knowledge.Methods: We use the history of randomized experiments in criminology and policing to emphasize how influential individuals and funding agencies have played a key role in advancing science in particular areas. We focus on the impact the NPIA has had on dramatically increasing the number of policing systematic reviews and advancing knowledge about effective policing strategies.Results: The nine completed Campbell reviews funded by the NPIA have more than doubled the number of Campbell Collaboration reviews related to policing and have increased our knowledge about a number of policing programs and strategies. Collectively, these reviews suggest a number of areas where the police can be successful in increasing fairness and effectiveness in policing.Conclusions: Key individuals, particularly when connected to funding agencies, can have a major impact on the trajectory of scientific knowledge. The NPIA program on systematic reviews in policing demonstrates the influence dedicated funding can have on advancing our knowledge on important policing topics.

AB - Objectives: To review what we have learned from the policing systematic reviews funded by the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) and to examine the importance of funding and influential individuals in advancing scientific knowledge.Methods: We use the history of randomized experiments in criminology and policing to emphasize how influential individuals and funding agencies have played a key role in advancing science in particular areas. We focus on the impact the NPIA has had on dramatically increasing the number of policing systematic reviews and advancing knowledge about effective policing strategies.Results: The nine completed Campbell reviews funded by the NPIA have more than doubled the number of Campbell Collaboration reviews related to policing and have increased our knowledge about a number of policing programs and strategies. Collectively, these reviews suggest a number of areas where the police can be successful in increasing fairness and effectiveness in policing.Conclusions: Key individuals, particularly when connected to funding agencies, can have a major impact on the trajectory of scientific knowledge. The NPIA program on systematic reviews in policing demonstrates the influence dedicated funding can have on advancing our knowledge on important policing topics.

KW - Funding

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - National Policing Improvement Agency

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928666391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928666391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11292-014-9206-7

DO - 10.1007/s11292-014-9206-7

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 371

EP - 398

JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology

JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology

SN - 1573-3750

IS - 4

ER -