Gendered discipline, gendered space: an ethnographic approach to gendered violence in India

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Why are Indian women’s lives at fatal risk in the public sphere, when Indian democracy is inclusive in terms of gender? Addressing this question reveals a methodological and theoretical blind spot in political science scholarship – a blind spot which results in the reproduction and legitimization of gender-blindness. To understand how and why political science reproduces and legitimizes gender-blindness I reflect on a particularly horrific case of sexual and gender-based violence, the 2012 Delhi gang rape. This analysis is significant because it provides insight into the difficulty of understanding gendered violence in political science and achieving gender equality within democratic societies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-14
    Number of pages14
    JournalSpace and Polity
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Oct 22 2016

    Fingerprint

    violence
    gender
    India
    political science
    blindness
    rape
    democracy
    equality
    society
    science

    Keywords

    • feminism
    • political ethnography
    • political science
    • public sphere
    • sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV)
    • violence against women (VAW)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Political Science and International Relations

    Cite this

    Gendered discipline, gendered space : an ethnographic approach to gendered violence in India. / Behl, Natasha.

    In: Space and Polity, 22.10.2016, p. 1-14.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{9cb82cc5992d4f61a1273cf39eb6e212,
    title = "Gendered discipline, gendered space: an ethnographic approach to gendered violence in India",
    abstract = "Why are Indian women’s lives at fatal risk in the public sphere, when Indian democracy is inclusive in terms of gender? Addressing this question reveals a methodological and theoretical blind spot in political science scholarship – a blind spot which results in the reproduction and legitimization of gender-blindness. To understand how and why political science reproduces and legitimizes gender-blindness I reflect on a particularly horrific case of sexual and gender-based violence, the 2012 Delhi gang rape. This analysis is significant because it provides insight into the difficulty of understanding gendered violence in political science and achieving gender equality within democratic societies.",
    keywords = "feminism, political ethnography, political science, public sphere, sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), violence against women (VAW)",
    author = "Natasha Behl",
    year = "2016",
    month = "10",
    day = "22",
    doi = "10.1080/13562576.2017.1243774",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "1--14",
    journal = "Space and Polity",
    issn = "1356-2576",
    publisher = "Routledge",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Gendered discipline, gendered space

    T2 - an ethnographic approach to gendered violence in India

    AU - Behl, Natasha

    PY - 2016/10/22

    Y1 - 2016/10/22

    N2 - Why are Indian women’s lives at fatal risk in the public sphere, when Indian democracy is inclusive in terms of gender? Addressing this question reveals a methodological and theoretical blind spot in political science scholarship – a blind spot which results in the reproduction and legitimization of gender-blindness. To understand how and why political science reproduces and legitimizes gender-blindness I reflect on a particularly horrific case of sexual and gender-based violence, the 2012 Delhi gang rape. This analysis is significant because it provides insight into the difficulty of understanding gendered violence in political science and achieving gender equality within democratic societies.

    AB - Why are Indian women’s lives at fatal risk in the public sphere, when Indian democracy is inclusive in terms of gender? Addressing this question reveals a methodological and theoretical blind spot in political science scholarship – a blind spot which results in the reproduction and legitimization of gender-blindness. To understand how and why political science reproduces and legitimizes gender-blindness I reflect on a particularly horrific case of sexual and gender-based violence, the 2012 Delhi gang rape. This analysis is significant because it provides insight into the difficulty of understanding gendered violence in political science and achieving gender equality within democratic societies.

    KW - feminism

    KW - political ethnography

    KW - political science

    KW - public sphere

    KW - sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV)

    KW - violence against women (VAW)

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992049112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992049112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/13562576.2017.1243774

    DO - 10.1080/13562576.2017.1243774

    M3 - Article

    SP - 1

    EP - 14

    JO - Space and Polity

    JF - Space and Polity

    SN - 1356-2576

    ER -