Gender Inequality and Knowledge Production in Criminology and Criminal Justice

Chantal Fahmy, Jacob Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies show that co-authorship of scholarly articles in criminology and criminal justice journals are stratified by gender: males are more likely to publish with males, females are more likely to publish with males. Increasing co-authorship has led some to claim that the intellectual contributions of females may be devalued, systematically putting them at a disadvantage for tenure and promotion decisions. Despite the importance of understanding gender inequality in knowledge production, no studies have examined the mechanisms that produce this outcome. Using data from 656 publications in five journals, we examine the structure of gender and co-authorship by testing two mechanisms that may generate a gendered distribution among scholarly articles. Although females exhibit a greater proclivity toward co-authorship with males, we show that this is a consequence of higher productivity among males. The tendency for males to have higher productivity than females in publications actually increases the likelihood of cross-gender collaboration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 29 2016

Fingerprint

criminology
knowledge production
justice
gender
productivity
promotion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Law

Cite this

Gender Inequality and Knowledge Production in Criminology and Criminal Justice. / Fahmy, Chantal; Young, Jacob.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29.09.2016, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17d0cc0598234acc8ccdf91a08666fb9,
title = "Gender Inequality and Knowledge Production in Criminology and Criminal Justice",
abstract = "Studies show that co-authorship of scholarly articles in criminology and criminal justice journals are stratified by gender: males are more likely to publish with males, females are more likely to publish with males. Increasing co-authorship has led some to claim that the intellectual contributions of females may be devalued, systematically putting them at a disadvantage for tenure and promotion decisions. Despite the importance of understanding gender inequality in knowledge production, no studies have examined the mechanisms that produce this outcome. Using data from 656 publications in five journals, we examine the structure of gender and co-authorship by testing two mechanisms that may generate a gendered distribution among scholarly articles. Although females exhibit a greater proclivity toward co-authorship with males, we show that this is a consequence of higher productivity among males. The tendency for males to have higher productivity than females in publications actually increases the likelihood of cross-gender collaboration.",
author = "Chantal Fahmy and Jacob Young",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/10511253.2016.1233346",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice Education",
issn = "1051-1253",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Inequality and Knowledge Production in Criminology and Criminal Justice

AU - Fahmy, Chantal

AU - Young, Jacob

PY - 2016/9/29

Y1 - 2016/9/29

N2 - Studies show that co-authorship of scholarly articles in criminology and criminal justice journals are stratified by gender: males are more likely to publish with males, females are more likely to publish with males. Increasing co-authorship has led some to claim that the intellectual contributions of females may be devalued, systematically putting them at a disadvantage for tenure and promotion decisions. Despite the importance of understanding gender inequality in knowledge production, no studies have examined the mechanisms that produce this outcome. Using data from 656 publications in five journals, we examine the structure of gender and co-authorship by testing two mechanisms that may generate a gendered distribution among scholarly articles. Although females exhibit a greater proclivity toward co-authorship with males, we show that this is a consequence of higher productivity among males. The tendency for males to have higher productivity than females in publications actually increases the likelihood of cross-gender collaboration.

AB - Studies show that co-authorship of scholarly articles in criminology and criminal justice journals are stratified by gender: males are more likely to publish with males, females are more likely to publish with males. Increasing co-authorship has led some to claim that the intellectual contributions of females may be devalued, systematically putting them at a disadvantage for tenure and promotion decisions. Despite the importance of understanding gender inequality in knowledge production, no studies have examined the mechanisms that produce this outcome. Using data from 656 publications in five journals, we examine the structure of gender and co-authorship by testing two mechanisms that may generate a gendered distribution among scholarly articles. Although females exhibit a greater proclivity toward co-authorship with males, we show that this is a consequence of higher productivity among males. The tendency for males to have higher productivity than females in publications actually increases the likelihood of cross-gender collaboration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989244285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989244285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10511253.2016.1233346

DO - 10.1080/10511253.2016.1233346

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice Education

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice Education

SN - 1051-1253

ER -