TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender diversity strategy in academic departments
T2 - exploring organizational determinants
AU - Su, Xuhong
AU - Johnson, Japera
AU - Bozeman, Barry
N1 - Funding Information:
The data on which this research is based were supported by National Science Foundation CAREER Grant REC 0447878/0710836, “University Determinants of Women’s Academic Career Success” (Monica Gaughan, Principal Investigator) and NSF grant SBR 9818229, “Assessing R and D Projects’ Impacts on Scientific and Technical Human Capital Development” (Barry Bozeman, Principal Investigator). The views reported here do not necessarily reflect those of National Science Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Full inclusion of women into the academics remains a daunting challenge in the United States. The situation is particularly acute within science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields where the underrepresentation of women and their career disadvantages attract a great deal of attention. Based on a dataset combining a survey of department chairs and their performance indicators, we attempt to investigate organizational determinants of gender diversity strategies in the STEM fields. The findings suggest that academic departments’ commitment to a gender diversity strategy is related to their chairs’ administrative power and their assessment of current gender diversity status. Moreover, the commitment signals departments’ responses to social demands for more female faculty members. Nevertheless, women chairs prove less likely to pursue a gender diversity strategy, and more female faculty members hardly increase the likelihood of adopting such a strategy. The findings require care in interpretation because in cases where there are more women, the perceived need for adding women may be lessened. As such, gender diversity strategy may be compensatory in nature. The present study underscores the need for richer theories about recruitment of women STEM faculty and possibly, modifications in public policy for STEM human resources.
AB - Full inclusion of women into the academics remains a daunting challenge in the United States. The situation is particularly acute within science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields where the underrepresentation of women and their career disadvantages attract a great deal of attention. Based on a dataset combining a survey of department chairs and their performance indicators, we attempt to investigate organizational determinants of gender diversity strategies in the STEM fields. The findings suggest that academic departments’ commitment to a gender diversity strategy is related to their chairs’ administrative power and their assessment of current gender diversity status. Moreover, the commitment signals departments’ responses to social demands for more female faculty members. Nevertheless, women chairs prove less likely to pursue a gender diversity strategy, and more female faculty members hardly increase the likelihood of adopting such a strategy. The findings require care in interpretation because in cases where there are more women, the perceived need for adding women may be lessened. As such, gender diversity strategy may be compensatory in nature. The present study underscores the need for richer theories about recruitment of women STEM faculty and possibly, modifications in public policy for STEM human resources.
KW - Female department chairs
KW - Gender diversity strategy
KW - Power of department chairs
KW - Representation of female faculty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929085616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929085616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10734-014-9808-z
DO - 10.1007/s10734-014-9808-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84929085616
SN - 0018-1560
VL - 69
SP - 839
EP - 858
JO - Higher Education
JF - Higher Education
IS - 5
ER -