Gender differences in social security disability decisions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study analyzes gender differences in Social Security disability awards. Logit analysis is used to identify significant determinants of receiving a Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) award. The results show that, even after controlling for applicant characteristics and nature of impairment, women receive Social Security disability awards at a significantly lower rate than do men. An analysis of the process whereby eligibility for SSDI is determined shows that men and women are equally likely to satisfy medical criteria for awards, but women, particularly women over age 55, are more likely to be rejected on the basis of vocational criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-49
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Disability Policy Studies
Volume8
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Security
social security
gender-specific factors
Disability Insurance
disability
insurance
applicant
determinants
income

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Law

Cite this

Gender differences in social security disability decisions. / Baldwin, Marjorie.

In: Journal of Disability Policy Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1-2, 1997, p. 25-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8fd1329444c4450aa529c7c1391aac71,
title = "Gender differences in social security disability decisions",
abstract = "This study analyzes gender differences in Social Security disability awards. Logit analysis is used to identify significant determinants of receiving a Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) award. The results show that, even after controlling for applicant characteristics and nature of impairment, women receive Social Security disability awards at a significantly lower rate than do men. An analysis of the process whereby eligibility for SSDI is determined shows that men and women are equally likely to satisfy medical criteria for awards, but women, particularly women over age 55, are more likely to be rejected on the basis of vocational criteria.",
author = "Marjorie Baldwin",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1177/104420739700800203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "25--49",
journal = "Journal of Disability Policy Studies",
issn = "1044-2073",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in social security disability decisions

AU - Baldwin, Marjorie

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This study analyzes gender differences in Social Security disability awards. Logit analysis is used to identify significant determinants of receiving a Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) award. The results show that, even after controlling for applicant characteristics and nature of impairment, women receive Social Security disability awards at a significantly lower rate than do men. An analysis of the process whereby eligibility for SSDI is determined shows that men and women are equally likely to satisfy medical criteria for awards, but women, particularly women over age 55, are more likely to be rejected on the basis of vocational criteria.

AB - This study analyzes gender differences in Social Security disability awards. Logit analysis is used to identify significant determinants of receiving a Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) award. The results show that, even after controlling for applicant characteristics and nature of impairment, women receive Social Security disability awards at a significantly lower rate than do men. An analysis of the process whereby eligibility for SSDI is determined shows that men and women are equally likely to satisfy medical criteria for awards, but women, particularly women over age 55, are more likely to be rejected on the basis of vocational criteria.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345355406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345355406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/104420739700800203

DO - 10.1177/104420739700800203

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0345355406

VL - 8

SP - 25

EP - 49

JO - Journal of Disability Policy Studies

JF - Journal of Disability Policy Studies

SN - 1044-2073

IS - 1-2

ER -