Gender Differences in Reactions to Fact Checking of Negative Commercials

Kim Fridkin, Jillian Courey, Samantha Hernandez, Joshua Spears

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of most negative campaigns in history may have taken place during the 2014 Senate election cycle. Nearly 75% of senate ads aired during a two-week period in early fall of 2014 showed a candidate in a negative light, according to the Wesleyan Media Project. A postelection analysis by the Center for Public Integrity showed that 46% of the more than one million ads aired during the 2014 senate campaigns were negative. And, in the most competitive states, the proportion of negative ads was even higher (e.g., 67% in North Carolina, 58% in Kansas). Negative advertisements sponsored by candidates, interest groups, and political parties are being launched on the airways, in newspapers, on radio, and via the Internet at an unprecedented pace. These advertisements, however, are now routinely subjected to fact checking. The Washington Post, along with many other fact-checking organizations, such as PolitiFact, The AP Factcheck, and Factcheck.org, examine thousands of statements and political advertisements during campaigns to determine the accuracy of the claims. For instance, during the 2012 election cycle, PolitiFact had 36 reporters and editors working in 11 states producing more than 800 fact checks on the presidential campaign and hundreds more for candidates running for the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-390
Number of pages22
JournalPolitics & Gender
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Differences in Reactions to Fact Checking of Negative Commercials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this