Gender differences in engineering students’ imagined futures

Jonathan C. Hilpert, Jenefer Husman, Melissa L. Carrion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Future Time Perspective (FTP) theory addresses how the content and dimensions of people’s imagined futures impact their learning and motivation. We used FTP theory to determine if gender differences existed in types of future events students envision and how these events were related to academic functioning. Purpose: In light of the intense national focus on career/life balance for women in the sciences, the focus of this study was to determine if students actually imagine such a trade-off when asked to think about the future. Design: We examined self-reported future events, motivation, and knowledge building from a sample of 366 engineering students. We analyzed the survey data using correlations, t-tests, and frequency counts to determine the relationship between imagined futures and academic functioning, as well as gender differences, respectively. Results: Results indicated that male students imagined significantly more professional events than female students, and that professional events were related to adaptive academic functioning. Analysis of the data suggests female engineering students self-reported a trade-off between professional and domestic events. Conclusions: We discuss the findings in the context of recent career/life balance initiatives and the need for improved industry mechanisms for helping women balance career and family.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-210
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

gender-specific factors
Students
engineering
event
life career
student
female student
career
industry
science
Industry
learning

Keywords

  • Engineering education
  • Future time perspective
  • Gender
  • Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Gender differences in engineering students’ imagined futures. / Hilpert, Jonathan C.; Husman, Jenefer; Carrion, Melissa L.

In: Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2014, p. 197-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hilpert, Jonathan C. ; Husman, Jenefer ; Carrion, Melissa L. / Gender differences in engineering students’ imagined futures. In: Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 197-210.
@article{d60222e1e0054524b54c535e7dcb2278,
title = "Gender differences in engineering students’ imagined futures",
abstract = "Background: Future Time Perspective (FTP) theory addresses how the content and dimensions of people’s imagined futures impact their learning and motivation. We used FTP theory to determine if gender differences existed in types of future events students envision and how these events were related to academic functioning. Purpose: In light of the intense national focus on career/life balance for women in the sciences, the focus of this study was to determine if students actually imagine such a trade-off when asked to think about the future. Design: We examined self-reported future events, motivation, and knowledge building from a sample of 366 engineering students. We analyzed the survey data using correlations, t-tests, and frequency counts to determine the relationship between imagined futures and academic functioning, as well as gender differences, respectively. Results: Results indicated that male students imagined significantly more professional events than female students, and that professional events were related to adaptive academic functioning. Analysis of the data suggests female engineering students self-reported a trade-off between professional and domestic events. Conclusions: We discuss the findings in the context of recent career/life balance initiatives and the need for improved industry mechanisms for helping women balance career and family.",
keywords = "Engineering education, Future time perspective, Gender, Motivation",
author = "Hilpert, {Jonathan C.} and Jenefer Husman and Carrion, {Melissa L.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "197--210",
journal = "Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering",
issn = "1072-8325",
publisher = "Begell House Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in engineering students’ imagined futures

AU - Hilpert, Jonathan C.

AU - Husman, Jenefer

AU - Carrion, Melissa L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Future Time Perspective (FTP) theory addresses how the content and dimensions of people’s imagined futures impact their learning and motivation. We used FTP theory to determine if gender differences existed in types of future events students envision and how these events were related to academic functioning. Purpose: In light of the intense national focus on career/life balance for women in the sciences, the focus of this study was to determine if students actually imagine such a trade-off when asked to think about the future. Design: We examined self-reported future events, motivation, and knowledge building from a sample of 366 engineering students. We analyzed the survey data using correlations, t-tests, and frequency counts to determine the relationship between imagined futures and academic functioning, as well as gender differences, respectively. Results: Results indicated that male students imagined significantly more professional events than female students, and that professional events were related to adaptive academic functioning. Analysis of the data suggests female engineering students self-reported a trade-off between professional and domestic events. Conclusions: We discuss the findings in the context of recent career/life balance initiatives and the need for improved industry mechanisms for helping women balance career and family.

AB - Background: Future Time Perspective (FTP) theory addresses how the content and dimensions of people’s imagined futures impact their learning and motivation. We used FTP theory to determine if gender differences existed in types of future events students envision and how these events were related to academic functioning. Purpose: In light of the intense national focus on career/life balance for women in the sciences, the focus of this study was to determine if students actually imagine such a trade-off when asked to think about the future. Design: We examined self-reported future events, motivation, and knowledge building from a sample of 366 engineering students. We analyzed the survey data using correlations, t-tests, and frequency counts to determine the relationship between imagined futures and academic functioning, as well as gender differences, respectively. Results: Results indicated that male students imagined significantly more professional events than female students, and that professional events were related to adaptive academic functioning. Analysis of the data suggests female engineering students self-reported a trade-off between professional and domestic events. Conclusions: We discuss the findings in the context of recent career/life balance initiatives and the need for improved industry mechanisms for helping women balance career and family.

KW - Engineering education

KW - Future time perspective

KW - Gender

KW - Motivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907294720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907294720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007079

DO - 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007079

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 197

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

JF - Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

SN - 1072-8325

IS - 3

ER -