Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy: A criterion decomposition approach

Jeffery LePine, John R. Hollenbeck, Daniel R. Ilgen, Jason A. Colquitt, Aleksander Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study reexamines conclusions regarding the superiority of all male teams on traditionally masculine tasks. By decomposing the criterion of decision-making accuracy, we illustrate how male-dominated teams may, in some contexts, constitute the worst gender composition. Specifically, as the percentage of males on a team increased, there was an exponential increase in the tendency for making decisions that were overaggressive. However, this bias in male-dominated teams' decision making was neutralized when teams received feedback on past levels of overaggressiveness. We document these effects in a study of 80 four-person teams using a simulation of a task that is masculine in its characteristics and male-dominated in terms of occupational demography. Possible interventions aimed at improving team decision-making accuracy are suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-475
Number of pages31
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume88
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Demography
Team decision making
Decomposition
Decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy : A criterion decomposition approach. / LePine, Jeffery; Hollenbeck, John R.; Ilgen, Daniel R.; Colquitt, Jason A.; Ellis, Aleksander.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2002, p. 445-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LePine, Jeffery ; Hollenbeck, John R. ; Ilgen, Daniel R. ; Colquitt, Jason A. ; Ellis, Aleksander. / Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy : A criterion decomposition approach. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2002 ; Vol. 88, No. 1. pp. 445-475.
@article{c92acc1f901d48408545671f5b85631a,
title = "Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy: A criterion decomposition approach",
abstract = "This study reexamines conclusions regarding the superiority of all male teams on traditionally masculine tasks. By decomposing the criterion of decision-making accuracy, we illustrate how male-dominated teams may, in some contexts, constitute the worst gender composition. Specifically, as the percentage of males on a team increased, there was an exponential increase in the tendency for making decisions that were overaggressive. However, this bias in male-dominated teams' decision making was neutralized when teams received feedback on past levels of overaggressiveness. We document these effects in a study of 80 four-person teams using a simulation of a task that is masculine in its characteristics and male-dominated in terms of occupational demography. Possible interventions aimed at improving team decision-making accuracy are suggested.",
author = "Jeffery LePine and Hollenbeck, {John R.} and Ilgen, {Daniel R.} and Colquitt, {Jason A.} and Aleksander Ellis",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.2001.2986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "445--475",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy

T2 - A criterion decomposition approach

AU - LePine, Jeffery

AU - Hollenbeck, John R.

AU - Ilgen, Daniel R.

AU - Colquitt, Jason A.

AU - Ellis, Aleksander

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This study reexamines conclusions regarding the superiority of all male teams on traditionally masculine tasks. By decomposing the criterion of decision-making accuracy, we illustrate how male-dominated teams may, in some contexts, constitute the worst gender composition. Specifically, as the percentage of males on a team increased, there was an exponential increase in the tendency for making decisions that were overaggressive. However, this bias in male-dominated teams' decision making was neutralized when teams received feedback on past levels of overaggressiveness. We document these effects in a study of 80 four-person teams using a simulation of a task that is masculine in its characteristics and male-dominated in terms of occupational demography. Possible interventions aimed at improving team decision-making accuracy are suggested.

AB - This study reexamines conclusions regarding the superiority of all male teams on traditionally masculine tasks. By decomposing the criterion of decision-making accuracy, we illustrate how male-dominated teams may, in some contexts, constitute the worst gender composition. Specifically, as the percentage of males on a team increased, there was an exponential increase in the tendency for making decisions that were overaggressive. However, this bias in male-dominated teams' decision making was neutralized when teams received feedback on past levels of overaggressiveness. We document these effects in a study of 80 four-person teams using a simulation of a task that is masculine in its characteristics and male-dominated in terms of occupational demography. Possible interventions aimed at improving team decision-making accuracy are suggested.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036258186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036258186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.2001.2986

DO - 10.1006/obhd.2001.2986

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036258186

VL - 88

SP - 445

EP - 475

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -