Abstract

Garland E. Allen’s 1978 biography of the Nobel Prize winning biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan provides an excellent study of the man and his science. Allen presents Morgan as an opportunistic scientist who follows where his observations take him, leading him to his foundational work in Drosophila genetics. The book was rightfully hailed as an important achievement and it introduced generations of readers to Morgan. Yet, in hindsight, Allen’s book largely misses an equally important part of Morgan’s work – his study of development and regeneration. It is worth returning to this part of Morgan, exploring what Morgan contributed and also why he has been seen by contemporaries and historians such as Allen as having set aside some of the most important developmental problems. A closer look shows how Morgan’s view of cells and development that was different from that of his most noted contemporaries led to interpretation of his important contributions in favor of genetics. This essay is part of a special issue, revisiting Garland Allen's views on the history of life sciences in the twentieth century.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the History of Biology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 20 2015

Fingerprint

Nobel Prize
Biological Science Disciplines
Drosophila
biologists
Regeneration
History
life history
cells
Life Sciences
Reader
Historian
Hindsight
Cells

Keywords

  • Embryology
  • Garland E. Allen
  • Genetics
  • Regeneration
  • Thomas Hunt Morgan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Garland Allen, Thomas Hunt Morgan, and Development. / Maienschein, Jane.

In: Journal of the History of Biology, 20.10.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee0634d8ec734052b4fe238839f59822,
title = "Garland Allen, Thomas Hunt Morgan, and Development",
abstract = "Garland E. Allen’s 1978 biography of the Nobel Prize winning biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan provides an excellent study of the man and his science. Allen presents Morgan as an opportunistic scientist who follows where his observations take him, leading him to his foundational work in Drosophila genetics. The book was rightfully hailed as an important achievement and it introduced generations of readers to Morgan. Yet, in hindsight, Allen’s book largely misses an equally important part of Morgan’s work – his study of development and regeneration. It is worth returning to this part of Morgan, exploring what Morgan contributed and also why he has been seen by contemporaries and historians such as Allen as having set aside some of the most important developmental problems. A closer look shows how Morgan’s view of cells and development that was different from that of his most noted contemporaries led to interpretation of his important contributions in favor of genetics. This essay is part of a special issue, revisiting Garland Allen's views on the history of life sciences in the twentieth century.",
keywords = "Embryology, Garland E. Allen, Genetics, Regeneration, Thomas Hunt Morgan",
author = "Jane Maienschein",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/s10739-015-9426-3",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the History of Biology",
issn = "0022-5010",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Garland Allen, Thomas Hunt Morgan, and Development

AU - Maienschein, Jane

PY - 2015/10/20

Y1 - 2015/10/20

N2 - Garland E. Allen’s 1978 biography of the Nobel Prize winning biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan provides an excellent study of the man and his science. Allen presents Morgan as an opportunistic scientist who follows where his observations take him, leading him to his foundational work in Drosophila genetics. The book was rightfully hailed as an important achievement and it introduced generations of readers to Morgan. Yet, in hindsight, Allen’s book largely misses an equally important part of Morgan’s work – his study of development and regeneration. It is worth returning to this part of Morgan, exploring what Morgan contributed and also why he has been seen by contemporaries and historians such as Allen as having set aside some of the most important developmental problems. A closer look shows how Morgan’s view of cells and development that was different from that of his most noted contemporaries led to interpretation of his important contributions in favor of genetics. This essay is part of a special issue, revisiting Garland Allen's views on the history of life sciences in the twentieth century.

AB - Garland E. Allen’s 1978 biography of the Nobel Prize winning biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan provides an excellent study of the man and his science. Allen presents Morgan as an opportunistic scientist who follows where his observations take him, leading him to his foundational work in Drosophila genetics. The book was rightfully hailed as an important achievement and it introduced generations of readers to Morgan. Yet, in hindsight, Allen’s book largely misses an equally important part of Morgan’s work – his study of development and regeneration. It is worth returning to this part of Morgan, exploring what Morgan contributed and also why he has been seen by contemporaries and historians such as Allen as having set aside some of the most important developmental problems. A closer look shows how Morgan’s view of cells and development that was different from that of his most noted contemporaries led to interpretation of his important contributions in favor of genetics. This essay is part of a special issue, revisiting Garland Allen's views on the history of life sciences in the twentieth century.

KW - Embryology

KW - Garland E. Allen

KW - Genetics

KW - Regeneration

KW - Thomas Hunt Morgan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944936895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944936895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10739-015-9426-3

DO - 10.1007/s10739-015-9426-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 26486645

AN - SCOPUS:84944936895

JO - Journal of the History of Biology

JF - Journal of the History of Biology

SN - 0022-5010

ER -