Gaming and displacement: Winners and losers in American Indian casino development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1987, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians upholding the legal right of American Indian tribes to offer gaming on reservation lands. In the years since, tribal gaming has done what no other anti-poverty programme has been able to do in reversing the cycle of displacement and impoverishment of American Indians. In 2002, the 321 tribal casinos owned and operated by 201 Indian tribes generated over $10.6 billion dollars in net revenues. Among its proponents, tribal gaming has been hailed as the "new buffalo" for American Indians and credited with transforming once destitute Indian reservations from the grips of poverty, unemployment, and welfare dependency. Given the choices at hand, it is not surprising that many have seized upon gambling as a bonanza and much needed, though controversial, form of development. Yet this reversal of fortune after generations of impoverishment has exacted a displacement toll few proponents have been willing to acknowledge: social conflict, tribal factionalism, and cultural antagonism. In this essay I consider some of these displacement effects, their historical antecedents, and the ramifications for Indian and non-Indian communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-134
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Social Science Journal
Volume55
Issue number175
StatePublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

American Indian
ethnic group
poverty
social conflict
antagonism
gambling
dollar
Supreme Court
unemployment
revenue
welfare
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Gaming and displacement : Winners and losers in American Indian casino development. / Gonzales, Angela.

In: International Social Science Journal, Vol. 55, No. 175, 03.2003, p. 123-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26f7811963894352bff339c4eaff6820,
title = "Gaming and displacement: Winners and losers in American Indian casino development",
abstract = "In 1987, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians upholding the legal right of American Indian tribes to offer gaming on reservation lands. In the years since, tribal gaming has done what no other anti-poverty programme has been able to do in reversing the cycle of displacement and impoverishment of American Indians. In 2002, the 321 tribal casinos owned and operated by 201 Indian tribes generated over $10.6 billion dollars in net revenues. Among its proponents, tribal gaming has been hailed as the {"}new buffalo{"} for American Indians and credited with transforming once destitute Indian reservations from the grips of poverty, unemployment, and welfare dependency. Given the choices at hand, it is not surprising that many have seized upon gambling as a bonanza and much needed, though controversial, form of development. Yet this reversal of fortune after generations of impoverishment has exacted a displacement toll few proponents have been willing to acknowledge: social conflict, tribal factionalism, and cultural antagonism. In this essay I consider some of these displacement effects, their historical antecedents, and the ramifications for Indian and non-Indian communities.",
author = "Angela Gonzales",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "123--134",
journal = "International Social Science Journal",
issn = "0020-8701",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "175",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gaming and displacement

T2 - Winners and losers in American Indian casino development

AU - Gonzales, Angela

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - In 1987, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians upholding the legal right of American Indian tribes to offer gaming on reservation lands. In the years since, tribal gaming has done what no other anti-poverty programme has been able to do in reversing the cycle of displacement and impoverishment of American Indians. In 2002, the 321 tribal casinos owned and operated by 201 Indian tribes generated over $10.6 billion dollars in net revenues. Among its proponents, tribal gaming has been hailed as the "new buffalo" for American Indians and credited with transforming once destitute Indian reservations from the grips of poverty, unemployment, and welfare dependency. Given the choices at hand, it is not surprising that many have seized upon gambling as a bonanza and much needed, though controversial, form of development. Yet this reversal of fortune after generations of impoverishment has exacted a displacement toll few proponents have been willing to acknowledge: social conflict, tribal factionalism, and cultural antagonism. In this essay I consider some of these displacement effects, their historical antecedents, and the ramifications for Indian and non-Indian communities.

AB - In 1987, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians upholding the legal right of American Indian tribes to offer gaming on reservation lands. In the years since, tribal gaming has done what no other anti-poverty programme has been able to do in reversing the cycle of displacement and impoverishment of American Indians. In 2002, the 321 tribal casinos owned and operated by 201 Indian tribes generated over $10.6 billion dollars in net revenues. Among its proponents, tribal gaming has been hailed as the "new buffalo" for American Indians and credited with transforming once destitute Indian reservations from the grips of poverty, unemployment, and welfare dependency. Given the choices at hand, it is not surprising that many have seized upon gambling as a bonanza and much needed, though controversial, form of development. Yet this reversal of fortune after generations of impoverishment has exacted a displacement toll few proponents have been willing to acknowledge: social conflict, tribal factionalism, and cultural antagonism. In this essay I consider some of these displacement effects, their historical antecedents, and the ramifications for Indian and non-Indian communities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037829129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037829129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037829129

VL - 55

SP - 123

EP - 134

JO - International Social Science Journal

JF - International Social Science Journal

SN - 0020-8701

IS - 175

ER -