Gambling Attitudes and Financial Misreporting

Dane M. Christensen, Keith L. Jones, David Kenchington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate whether attitudes toward gambling help explain the occurrence of intentional misreporting. Similar to gambling, some financial reporting choices involve taking deliberate, speculative risks. We predict that in places where gambling is more socially acceptable, managers will be more likely to take financial reporting risks that increase the likelihood the financial statements will need to be restated. To test this prediction, we exploit geographic variation in local gambling attitudes and find that restatements due to intentional misreporting are more common in areas where gambling is more socially acceptable. This association is even stronger in situations where management is under greater pressure to misreport, including when the firm is close to meeting a performance benchmark, experiencing poor financial performance, or under investment-related pressure. Furthermore, these results are robust to numerous tests to address omitted variables and endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest gambling attitudes help explain the incidence of intentional misreporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalContemporary Accounting Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Gambling
Misreporting
Financial reporting
Financial performance
Benchmark
Prediction
Omitted variables
Endogeneity
Managers
Underinvestment
Financial statements
Restatements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Gambling Attitudes and Financial Misreporting. / Christensen, Dane M.; Jones, Keith L.; Kenchington, David.

In: Contemporary Accounting Research, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe024dc833454afda36af0104af40f5a,
title = "Gambling Attitudes and Financial Misreporting",
abstract = "We investigate whether attitudes toward gambling help explain the occurrence of intentional misreporting. Similar to gambling, some financial reporting choices involve taking deliberate, speculative risks. We predict that in places where gambling is more socially acceptable, managers will be more likely to take financial reporting risks that increase the likelihood the financial statements will need to be restated. To test this prediction, we exploit geographic variation in local gambling attitudes and find that restatements due to intentional misreporting are more common in areas where gambling is more socially acceptable. This association is even stronger in situations where management is under greater pressure to misreport, including when the firm is close to meeting a performance benchmark, experiencing poor financial performance, or under investment-related pressure. Furthermore, these results are robust to numerous tests to address omitted variables and endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest gambling attitudes help explain the incidence of intentional misreporting.",
author = "Christensen, {Dane M.} and Jones, {Keith L.} and David Kenchington",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1911-3846.12322",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Contemporary Accounting Research",
issn = "0823-9150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gambling Attitudes and Financial Misreporting

AU - Christensen, Dane M.

AU - Jones, Keith L.

AU - Kenchington, David

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - We investigate whether attitudes toward gambling help explain the occurrence of intentional misreporting. Similar to gambling, some financial reporting choices involve taking deliberate, speculative risks. We predict that in places where gambling is more socially acceptable, managers will be more likely to take financial reporting risks that increase the likelihood the financial statements will need to be restated. To test this prediction, we exploit geographic variation in local gambling attitudes and find that restatements due to intentional misreporting are more common in areas where gambling is more socially acceptable. This association is even stronger in situations where management is under greater pressure to misreport, including when the firm is close to meeting a performance benchmark, experiencing poor financial performance, or under investment-related pressure. Furthermore, these results are robust to numerous tests to address omitted variables and endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest gambling attitudes help explain the incidence of intentional misreporting.

AB - We investigate whether attitudes toward gambling help explain the occurrence of intentional misreporting. Similar to gambling, some financial reporting choices involve taking deliberate, speculative risks. We predict that in places where gambling is more socially acceptable, managers will be more likely to take financial reporting risks that increase the likelihood the financial statements will need to be restated. To test this prediction, we exploit geographic variation in local gambling attitudes and find that restatements due to intentional misreporting are more common in areas where gambling is more socially acceptable. This association is even stronger in situations where management is under greater pressure to misreport, including when the firm is close to meeting a performance benchmark, experiencing poor financial performance, or under investment-related pressure. Furthermore, these results are robust to numerous tests to address omitted variables and endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest gambling attitudes help explain the incidence of intentional misreporting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032927008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032927008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1911-3846.12322

DO - 10.1111/1911-3846.12322

M3 - Article

JO - Contemporary Accounting Research

JF - Contemporary Accounting Research

SN - 0823-9150

ER -