Fuzzy people: The roles of kinship, essence, and sociability in the attribution of personhood to nonliving, nonhuman agents

Kathryn Johnson, Adam Cohen, Rebecca Neel, Anna Berlin, Donald Homa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evolutionary theories of religion have focused almost exclusively on anthropomorphic representations of God and of God as having a mind. However, religious beliefs extend to notions about material entities as well and, we propose, religious cognition can involve many distinct cognitive systems and social motivations including kin care, essentialist beliefs, and social exchange. We refer to the elevation of the social status of nonliving and nonhuman material entities as personification. In 3 studies we assess variability in the personification of a range of nonliving nonhuman entities. In Study 1, perceived kinship and the attribution of an inner essence, spirit, or soul to a particular target were important positive predictors of the personification of material nonliving or nonhuman entities whereas sociability was not. In Study 2, we compare personification among European Americans, Hispanic Americans, and American Indians to show that these perceptions can vary by cultural group. In Study 3, variation in personification was related to individual differences in beliefs about the soul or evolution. In all, we show the importance of perceived kinship bonds and essentialist beliefs in the personification of fetuses, the dead, animals, and objects, over and above the attribution of mental attributes-a new focus for understanding religious cognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-305
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Religion and Spirituality
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Personhood
Religion
Cognition
North American Indians
Hispanic Americans
Individuality
Motivation
Fetus
Attribution
Kinship
Personification
Essence
Sociability
Fuzzy
Nonhuman
Entity

Keywords

  • Anthropomorphism
  • Essence
  • Personification
  • Theory of mind

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Religious studies

Cite this

Fuzzy people : The roles of kinship, essence, and sociability in the attribution of personhood to nonliving, nonhuman agents. / Johnson, Kathryn; Cohen, Adam; Neel, Rebecca; Berlin, Anna; Homa, Donald.

In: Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.11.2015, p. 295-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{972ec3c2181142ac9fc99c1d4f786c42,
title = "Fuzzy people: The roles of kinship, essence, and sociability in the attribution of personhood to nonliving, nonhuman agents",
abstract = "Evolutionary theories of religion have focused almost exclusively on anthropomorphic representations of God and of God as having a mind. However, religious beliefs extend to notions about material entities as well and, we propose, religious cognition can involve many distinct cognitive systems and social motivations including kin care, essentialist beliefs, and social exchange. We refer to the elevation of the social status of nonliving and nonhuman material entities as personification. In 3 studies we assess variability in the personification of a range of nonliving nonhuman entities. In Study 1, perceived kinship and the attribution of an inner essence, spirit, or soul to a particular target were important positive predictors of the personification of material nonliving or nonhuman entities whereas sociability was not. In Study 2, we compare personification among European Americans, Hispanic Americans, and American Indians to show that these perceptions can vary by cultural group. In Study 3, variation in personification was related to individual differences in beliefs about the soul or evolution. In all, we show the importance of perceived kinship bonds and essentialist beliefs in the personification of fetuses, the dead, animals, and objects, over and above the attribution of mental attributes-a new focus for understanding religious cognition.",
keywords = "Anthropomorphism, Essence, Personification, Theory of mind",
author = "Kathryn Johnson and Adam Cohen and Rebecca Neel and Anna Berlin and Donald Homa",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/rel0000048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "295--305",
journal = "Psychology of Religion and Spirituality",
issn = "1941-1022",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fuzzy people

T2 - The roles of kinship, essence, and sociability in the attribution of personhood to nonliving, nonhuman agents

AU - Johnson, Kathryn

AU - Cohen, Adam

AU - Neel, Rebecca

AU - Berlin, Anna

AU - Homa, Donald

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Evolutionary theories of religion have focused almost exclusively on anthropomorphic representations of God and of God as having a mind. However, religious beliefs extend to notions about material entities as well and, we propose, religious cognition can involve many distinct cognitive systems and social motivations including kin care, essentialist beliefs, and social exchange. We refer to the elevation of the social status of nonliving and nonhuman material entities as personification. In 3 studies we assess variability in the personification of a range of nonliving nonhuman entities. In Study 1, perceived kinship and the attribution of an inner essence, spirit, or soul to a particular target were important positive predictors of the personification of material nonliving or nonhuman entities whereas sociability was not. In Study 2, we compare personification among European Americans, Hispanic Americans, and American Indians to show that these perceptions can vary by cultural group. In Study 3, variation in personification was related to individual differences in beliefs about the soul or evolution. In all, we show the importance of perceived kinship bonds and essentialist beliefs in the personification of fetuses, the dead, animals, and objects, over and above the attribution of mental attributes-a new focus for understanding religious cognition.

AB - Evolutionary theories of religion have focused almost exclusively on anthropomorphic representations of God and of God as having a mind. However, religious beliefs extend to notions about material entities as well and, we propose, religious cognition can involve many distinct cognitive systems and social motivations including kin care, essentialist beliefs, and social exchange. We refer to the elevation of the social status of nonliving and nonhuman material entities as personification. In 3 studies we assess variability in the personification of a range of nonliving nonhuman entities. In Study 1, perceived kinship and the attribution of an inner essence, spirit, or soul to a particular target were important positive predictors of the personification of material nonliving or nonhuman entities whereas sociability was not. In Study 2, we compare personification among European Americans, Hispanic Americans, and American Indians to show that these perceptions can vary by cultural group. In Study 3, variation in personification was related to individual differences in beliefs about the soul or evolution. In all, we show the importance of perceived kinship bonds and essentialist beliefs in the personification of fetuses, the dead, animals, and objects, over and above the attribution of mental attributes-a new focus for understanding religious cognition.

KW - Anthropomorphism

KW - Essence

KW - Personification

KW - Theory of mind

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964896318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964896318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/rel0000048

DO - 10.1037/rel0000048

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964896318

VL - 7

SP - 295

EP - 305

JO - Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

JF - Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

SN - 1941-1022

IS - 4

ER -