Fundamental social motives and the varieties of religious experience

Kathryn Johnson, Yexin Jessica Li, Adam Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evolutionary theorists have explained universals in religion, but no integrative theory exists to explain why multiple aspects of religion vary within and between individuals and groups. We propose how four dimensions of religions – beliefs about nonhuman agents, religious rituals, community structures, and moral concerns and values – may change in response to the fundamental social goals of self-protection, disease avoidance, coalition formation, status seeking, mating and mate retention, and kin care. We review empirical research and provide testable hypotheses, and finally discuss implications of this theoretical framework for the study of evolution and religion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-261
Number of pages65
JournalReligion, Brain and Behavior
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Religion
Ceremonial Behavior
Empirical Research
Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • Community
  • Evolution
  • Morality
  • Motivation
  • Nonhuman agents
  • Religion
  • Ritual

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Fundamental social motives and the varieties of religious experience. / Johnson, Kathryn; Li, Yexin Jessica; Cohen, Adam.

In: Religion, Brain and Behavior, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 197-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1e34f2b762e4e1e851aca089e6ab5f8,
title = "Fundamental social motives and the varieties of religious experience",
abstract = "Evolutionary theorists have explained universals in religion, but no integrative theory exists to explain why multiple aspects of religion vary within and between individuals and groups. We propose how four dimensions of religions – beliefs about nonhuman agents, religious rituals, community structures, and moral concerns and values – may change in response to the fundamental social goals of self-protection, disease avoidance, coalition formation, status seeking, mating and mate retention, and kin care. We review empirical research and provide testable hypotheses, and finally discuss implications of this theoretical framework for the study of evolution and religion.",
keywords = "Community, Evolution, Morality, Motivation, Nonhuman agents, Religion, Ritual",
author = "Kathryn Johnson and Li, {Yexin Jessica} and Adam Cohen",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/2153599X.2014.918684",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "197--261",
journal = "Religion, Brain and Behavior",
issn = "2153-599X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fundamental social motives and the varieties of religious experience

AU - Johnson, Kathryn

AU - Li, Yexin Jessica

AU - Cohen, Adam

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Evolutionary theorists have explained universals in religion, but no integrative theory exists to explain why multiple aspects of religion vary within and between individuals and groups. We propose how four dimensions of religions – beliefs about nonhuman agents, religious rituals, community structures, and moral concerns and values – may change in response to the fundamental social goals of self-protection, disease avoidance, coalition formation, status seeking, mating and mate retention, and kin care. We review empirical research and provide testable hypotheses, and finally discuss implications of this theoretical framework for the study of evolution and religion.

AB - Evolutionary theorists have explained universals in religion, but no integrative theory exists to explain why multiple aspects of religion vary within and between individuals and groups. We propose how four dimensions of religions – beliefs about nonhuman agents, religious rituals, community structures, and moral concerns and values – may change in response to the fundamental social goals of self-protection, disease avoidance, coalition formation, status seeking, mating and mate retention, and kin care. We review empirical research and provide testable hypotheses, and finally discuss implications of this theoretical framework for the study of evolution and religion.

KW - Community

KW - Evolution

KW - Morality

KW - Motivation

KW - Nonhuman agents

KW - Religion

KW - Ritual

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943427280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943427280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/2153599X.2014.918684

DO - 10.1080/2153599X.2014.918684

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84943427280

VL - 5

SP - 197

EP - 261

JO - Religion, Brain and Behavior

JF - Religion, Brain and Behavior

SN - 2153-599X

IS - 3

ER -