Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche

Michael J. Angilletta, Michael W. Sears, Ofir Levy, Jacob P. Youngblood, John M. Vandenbrooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For more than 70 years, Hutchinson's concept of the fundamental niche has guided ecological research. Hutchinson envisioned the niche as a multidimensional hypervolume relating the fitness of an organism to relevant environmental factors. Here, we challenge the utility of the concept to modern ecologists, based on its inability to account for environmental variation and phenotypic plasticity. We have ample evidence that the frequency, duration, and sequence of abiotic stress influence the survivorship and performance of organisms. Recent work shows that organisms also respond to the spatial configuration of abiotic conditions. Spatiotemporal variation of the environment interacts with the genotype to generate a unique phenotype at each life stage. These dynamics cannot be captured adequately by a multidimensional hypervolume. Therefore, we recommend that ecologists abandon the niche as a tool for predicting the persistence of species and embrace mechanistic models of population growth that incorporate spatiotemporal dynamics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1038-1048
Number of pages11
JournalIntegrative and comparative biology
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

niches
ecologists
organisms
mechanistic models
phenotypic plasticity
abiotic stress
population growth
survival rate
phenotype
environmental factors
duration
genotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Angilletta, M. J., Sears, M. W., Levy, O., Youngblood, J. P., & Vandenbrooks, J. M. (2019). Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche. Integrative and comparative biology, 59(4), 1038-1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icz084

Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche. / Angilletta, Michael J.; Sears, Michael W.; Levy, Ofir; Youngblood, Jacob P.; Vandenbrooks, John M.

In: Integrative and comparative biology, Vol. 59, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 1038-1048.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Angilletta, MJ, Sears, MW, Levy, O, Youngblood, JP & Vandenbrooks, JM 2019, 'Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche', Integrative and comparative biology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1038-1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icz084
Angilletta MJ, Sears MW, Levy O, Youngblood JP, Vandenbrooks JM. Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche. Integrative and comparative biology. 2019 Oct 1;59(4):1038-1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icz084
Angilletta, Michael J. ; Sears, Michael W. ; Levy, Ofir ; Youngblood, Jacob P. ; Vandenbrooks, John M. / Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche. In: Integrative and comparative biology. 2019 ; Vol. 59, No. 4. pp. 1038-1048.
@article{636ee6297e2e4874a7bb718fa961b52a,
title = "Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche",
abstract = "For more than 70 years, Hutchinson's concept of the fundamental niche has guided ecological research. Hutchinson envisioned the niche as a multidimensional hypervolume relating the fitness of an organism to relevant environmental factors. Here, we challenge the utility of the concept to modern ecologists, based on its inability to account for environmental variation and phenotypic plasticity. We have ample evidence that the frequency, duration, and sequence of abiotic stress influence the survivorship and performance of organisms. Recent work shows that organisms also respond to the spatial configuration of abiotic conditions. Spatiotemporal variation of the environment interacts with the genotype to generate a unique phenotype at each life stage. These dynamics cannot be captured adequately by a multidimensional hypervolume. Therefore, we recommend that ecologists abandon the niche as a tool for predicting the persistence of species and embrace mechanistic models of population growth that incorporate spatiotemporal dynamics.",
author = "Angilletta, {Michael J.} and Sears, {Michael W.} and Ofir Levy and Youngblood, {Jacob P.} and Vandenbrooks, {John M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/icb/icz084",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "1038--1048",
journal = "Integrative and Comparative Biology",
issn = "1540-7063",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche

AU - Angilletta, Michael J.

AU - Sears, Michael W.

AU - Levy, Ofir

AU - Youngblood, Jacob P.

AU - Vandenbrooks, John M.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - For more than 70 years, Hutchinson's concept of the fundamental niche has guided ecological research. Hutchinson envisioned the niche as a multidimensional hypervolume relating the fitness of an organism to relevant environmental factors. Here, we challenge the utility of the concept to modern ecologists, based on its inability to account for environmental variation and phenotypic plasticity. We have ample evidence that the frequency, duration, and sequence of abiotic stress influence the survivorship and performance of organisms. Recent work shows that organisms also respond to the spatial configuration of abiotic conditions. Spatiotemporal variation of the environment interacts with the genotype to generate a unique phenotype at each life stage. These dynamics cannot be captured adequately by a multidimensional hypervolume. Therefore, we recommend that ecologists abandon the niche as a tool for predicting the persistence of species and embrace mechanistic models of population growth that incorporate spatiotemporal dynamics.

AB - For more than 70 years, Hutchinson's concept of the fundamental niche has guided ecological research. Hutchinson envisioned the niche as a multidimensional hypervolume relating the fitness of an organism to relevant environmental factors. Here, we challenge the utility of the concept to modern ecologists, based on its inability to account for environmental variation and phenotypic plasticity. We have ample evidence that the frequency, duration, and sequence of abiotic stress influence the survivorship and performance of organisms. Recent work shows that organisms also respond to the spatial configuration of abiotic conditions. Spatiotemporal variation of the environment interacts with the genotype to generate a unique phenotype at each life stage. These dynamics cannot be captured adequately by a multidimensional hypervolume. Therefore, we recommend that ecologists abandon the niche as a tool for predicting the persistence of species and embrace mechanistic models of population growth that incorporate spatiotemporal dynamics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073576784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073576784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/icb/icz084

DO - 10.1093/icb/icz084

M3 - Article

C2 - 31141123

AN - SCOPUS:85073576784

VL - 59

SP - 1038

EP - 1048

JO - Integrative and Comparative Biology

JF - Integrative and Comparative Biology

SN - 1540-7063

IS - 4

ER -