Functions of Dysfunction

Managing the Dynamics of an Organizational Duality in a Natural Food Cooperative

Blake Ashforth, Peter H. Reingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report the results of an ethnographic study of a natural food cooperative in which we found an inherent tension in its mission between idealism and pragmatism, and we explore the dynamics through which that tension was managed and engaged in day-to-day governance and activities. Insights from participant observation, archival data, semi-structured interviews, and surveys provide a detailed and holistic account of the intergroup and intragroup processes through which the co-op negotiated its dualistic nature, as embodied in its hybrid organizational identity. The findings suggest that the value of each side of the duality was recognized at both the individual and organizational levels. Members' discomfort with the duality, however, led them to split the mission in two and identify with one part, while projecting their less-favored part on others, creating an identity foil (an antithesis). This splitting resulted in ingroups and outgroups and heated intergroup conflict over realizing cooperative ideals vs. running a viable business. Ingroup members favoring one part of the mission nonetheless identified with the outgroup favoring the other because it embodied a side of themselves they continued to value. Individuals who exemplified their ingroup's most extreme attributes were seen by the outgroup as prototypical, thus serving as "lightning rods" for intergroup conflict; this dynamic paradoxically enabled other ingroup members to work more effectively with moderate members of the outgroup. The idealist-pragmatist duality was kept continually in play over time through oscillating decisions and actions that shifted power from one group to the other, coupled with ongoing rituals to repair and maintain relationships disrupted by the messiness of the process. Thus ostensible dysfunctionality at the group level fostered functionality at the organizational level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)474-516
Number of pages43
JournalAdministrative Science Quarterly
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

outgroup
food
functionality
idealism
pragmatism
participant observation
Values
religious behavior
Group
governance
Duality
Food
interview

Keywords

  • food cooperatives
  • hybrid identity
  • intergroup conflict
  • organizational duality
  • organizational mission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Functions of Dysfunction : Managing the Dynamics of an Organizational Duality in a Natural Food Cooperative. / Ashforth, Blake; Reingen, Peter H.

In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 3, 2014, p. 474-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3621221e3bf540868d934160f46607b2,
title = "Functions of Dysfunction: Managing the Dynamics of an Organizational Duality in a Natural Food Cooperative",
abstract = "We report the results of an ethnographic study of a natural food cooperative in which we found an inherent tension in its mission between idealism and pragmatism, and we explore the dynamics through which that tension was managed and engaged in day-to-day governance and activities. Insights from participant observation, archival data, semi-structured interviews, and surveys provide a detailed and holistic account of the intergroup and intragroup processes through which the co-op negotiated its dualistic nature, as embodied in its hybrid organizational identity. The findings suggest that the value of each side of the duality was recognized at both the individual and organizational levels. Members' discomfort with the duality, however, led them to split the mission in two and identify with one part, while projecting their less-favored part on others, creating an identity foil (an antithesis). This splitting resulted in ingroups and outgroups and heated intergroup conflict over realizing cooperative ideals vs. running a viable business. Ingroup members favoring one part of the mission nonetheless identified with the outgroup favoring the other because it embodied a side of themselves they continued to value. Individuals who exemplified their ingroup's most extreme attributes were seen by the outgroup as prototypical, thus serving as {"}lightning rods{"} for intergroup conflict; this dynamic paradoxically enabled other ingroup members to work more effectively with moderate members of the outgroup. The idealist-pragmatist duality was kept continually in play over time through oscillating decisions and actions that shifted power from one group to the other, coupled with ongoing rituals to repair and maintain relationships disrupted by the messiness of the process. Thus ostensible dysfunctionality at the group level fostered functionality at the organizational level.",
keywords = "food cooperatives, hybrid identity, intergroup conflict, organizational duality, organizational mission",
author = "Blake Ashforth and Reingen, {Peter H.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0001839214537811",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "474--516",
journal = "Administrative Science Quarterly",
issn = "0001-8392",
publisher = "Johnson School at Cornell University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functions of Dysfunction

T2 - Managing the Dynamics of an Organizational Duality in a Natural Food Cooperative

AU - Ashforth, Blake

AU - Reingen, Peter H.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We report the results of an ethnographic study of a natural food cooperative in which we found an inherent tension in its mission between idealism and pragmatism, and we explore the dynamics through which that tension was managed and engaged in day-to-day governance and activities. Insights from participant observation, archival data, semi-structured interviews, and surveys provide a detailed and holistic account of the intergroup and intragroup processes through which the co-op negotiated its dualistic nature, as embodied in its hybrid organizational identity. The findings suggest that the value of each side of the duality was recognized at both the individual and organizational levels. Members' discomfort with the duality, however, led them to split the mission in two and identify with one part, while projecting their less-favored part on others, creating an identity foil (an antithesis). This splitting resulted in ingroups and outgroups and heated intergroup conflict over realizing cooperative ideals vs. running a viable business. Ingroup members favoring one part of the mission nonetheless identified with the outgroup favoring the other because it embodied a side of themselves they continued to value. Individuals who exemplified their ingroup's most extreme attributes were seen by the outgroup as prototypical, thus serving as "lightning rods" for intergroup conflict; this dynamic paradoxically enabled other ingroup members to work more effectively with moderate members of the outgroup. The idealist-pragmatist duality was kept continually in play over time through oscillating decisions and actions that shifted power from one group to the other, coupled with ongoing rituals to repair and maintain relationships disrupted by the messiness of the process. Thus ostensible dysfunctionality at the group level fostered functionality at the organizational level.

AB - We report the results of an ethnographic study of a natural food cooperative in which we found an inherent tension in its mission between idealism and pragmatism, and we explore the dynamics through which that tension was managed and engaged in day-to-day governance and activities. Insights from participant observation, archival data, semi-structured interviews, and surveys provide a detailed and holistic account of the intergroup and intragroup processes through which the co-op negotiated its dualistic nature, as embodied in its hybrid organizational identity. The findings suggest that the value of each side of the duality was recognized at both the individual and organizational levels. Members' discomfort with the duality, however, led them to split the mission in two and identify with one part, while projecting their less-favored part on others, creating an identity foil (an antithesis). This splitting resulted in ingroups and outgroups and heated intergroup conflict over realizing cooperative ideals vs. running a viable business. Ingroup members favoring one part of the mission nonetheless identified with the outgroup favoring the other because it embodied a side of themselves they continued to value. Individuals who exemplified their ingroup's most extreme attributes were seen by the outgroup as prototypical, thus serving as "lightning rods" for intergroup conflict; this dynamic paradoxically enabled other ingroup members to work more effectively with moderate members of the outgroup. The idealist-pragmatist duality was kept continually in play over time through oscillating decisions and actions that shifted power from one group to the other, coupled with ongoing rituals to repair and maintain relationships disrupted by the messiness of the process. Thus ostensible dysfunctionality at the group level fostered functionality at the organizational level.

KW - food cooperatives

KW - hybrid identity

KW - intergroup conflict

KW - organizational duality

KW - organizational mission

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905749658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905749658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0001839214537811

DO - 10.1177/0001839214537811

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 474

EP - 516

JO - Administrative Science Quarterly

JF - Administrative Science Quarterly

SN - 0001-8392

IS - 3

ER -