Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks: Order of presentation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several variants in the methods used to estimate delay discounting (DD) have been associated with within-subject differences in degree of DD. This study compared variants in the order of presentation of reward and delay values during assessment of DD of hypothetical cash. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. For one group, the immediate reward values were presented in Ascending order and for the other, they were presented in Descending order. In addition, all participants completed a DD task with the reward values presented in a Random order. Degree of DD, calculated as area under the curve (AUC), was similar between the Ascending and Descending procedures, and was significantly higher with the Random procedure. Within-subjects AUC were positively correlated. Reaction times within choice trials changed systematically as a function of order of presentation of the immediate rewards, and distance to the indifference point within each delay value. Reaction times appear to parallel the effort involved in making the individual choices. Some procedural variants in the assessment of DD yield differences in behavior during the assessment task that affect the magnitude of the estimated delay discounting. Thus, the absolute magnitude of DD may not be directly comparable between methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-241
Number of pages5
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume75
Issue number2 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Reward
methodology
Reaction Time
Area Under Curve
Delay Discounting
method
parameter
trial

Keywords

  • Delay discounting
  • Discounting functions
  • Impulsiveness
  • Research methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks : Order of presentation. / Robles-Sotelo, Elias; Vargas, Perla.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 75, No. 2 SPEC. ISS., 06.2007, p. 237-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f13e75fa6094b3ab5beee3cadb6ac19,
title = "Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks: Order of presentation",
abstract = "Several variants in the methods used to estimate delay discounting (DD) have been associated with within-subject differences in degree of DD. This study compared variants in the order of presentation of reward and delay values during assessment of DD of hypothetical cash. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. For one group, the immediate reward values were presented in Ascending order and for the other, they were presented in Descending order. In addition, all participants completed a DD task with the reward values presented in a Random order. Degree of DD, calculated as area under the curve (AUC), was similar between the Ascending and Descending procedures, and was significantly higher with the Random procedure. Within-subjects AUC were positively correlated. Reaction times within choice trials changed systematically as a function of order of presentation of the immediate rewards, and distance to the indifference point within each delay value. Reaction times appear to parallel the effort involved in making the individual choices. Some procedural variants in the assessment of DD yield differences in behavior during the assessment task that affect the magnitude of the estimated delay discounting. Thus, the absolute magnitude of DD may not be directly comparable between methods.",
keywords = "Delay discounting, Discounting functions, Impulsiveness, Research methods",
author = "Elias Robles-Sotelo and Perla Vargas",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "237--241",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks

T2 - Order of presentation

AU - Robles-Sotelo, Elias

AU - Vargas, Perla

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Several variants in the methods used to estimate delay discounting (DD) have been associated with within-subject differences in degree of DD. This study compared variants in the order of presentation of reward and delay values during assessment of DD of hypothetical cash. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. For one group, the immediate reward values were presented in Ascending order and for the other, they were presented in Descending order. In addition, all participants completed a DD task with the reward values presented in a Random order. Degree of DD, calculated as area under the curve (AUC), was similar between the Ascending and Descending procedures, and was significantly higher with the Random procedure. Within-subjects AUC were positively correlated. Reaction times within choice trials changed systematically as a function of order of presentation of the immediate rewards, and distance to the indifference point within each delay value. Reaction times appear to parallel the effort involved in making the individual choices. Some procedural variants in the assessment of DD yield differences in behavior during the assessment task that affect the magnitude of the estimated delay discounting. Thus, the absolute magnitude of DD may not be directly comparable between methods.

AB - Several variants in the methods used to estimate delay discounting (DD) have been associated with within-subject differences in degree of DD. This study compared variants in the order of presentation of reward and delay values during assessment of DD of hypothetical cash. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. For one group, the immediate reward values were presented in Ascending order and for the other, they were presented in Descending order. In addition, all participants completed a DD task with the reward values presented in a Random order. Degree of DD, calculated as area under the curve (AUC), was similar between the Ascending and Descending procedures, and was significantly higher with the Random procedure. Within-subjects AUC were positively correlated. Reaction times within choice trials changed systematically as a function of order of presentation of the immediate rewards, and distance to the indifference point within each delay value. Reaction times appear to parallel the effort involved in making the individual choices. Some procedural variants in the assessment of DD yield differences in behavior during the assessment task that affect the magnitude of the estimated delay discounting. Thus, the absolute magnitude of DD may not be directly comparable between methods.

KW - Delay discounting

KW - Discounting functions

KW - Impulsiveness

KW - Research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247096435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247096435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 17368757

AN - SCOPUS:34247096435

VL - 75

SP - 237

EP - 241

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 2 SPEC. ISS.

ER -