From Metaphor to Measurement

Resilience of What to What?

Steve Carpenter, Brian Walker, John Anderies, Nick Abel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1436 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Resilience is the magnitude of disturbance that can be tolerated before a socioecological system (SES) moves to a different region of state space controlled by a different set of processes. Resilience has multiple levels of meaning: As a metaphor related to sustainability, as a property of dynamic models, and as a measurable quantity that can be assessed in field studies of SES. The operational indicators of resilience have, however, received little attention in the literature. To assess a system's resilience, one must specify which system configuration and which disturbances are of interest. This paper compares resilience properties in two contrasting SES, lake districts and rangelands, with respect to the following three general features: (a) The ability of an SES to stay in the domain of attraction is related to slowly changing variables, or slowly changing disturbance regimes, which control the boundaries of the domain of attraction or the frequency of events that could push the system across the boundaries. Examples are soil phosphorus content in lake districts woody vegetation cover in rangelands, and property rights systems that affect land use in both lake districts and rangelands. (b) The ability of an SES to self-organize is related to the extent to which reorganization is endogenous rather than forced by external drivers. Self-organization is enhanced by coevolved ecosystem components and the presence of social networks that facilitate innovative problem solving. (c) The adaptive capacity of an SES is related to the existence of mechanisms for the evolution of novelty or learning. Examples include biodiversity at multiple scales and the existence of institutions that facilitate experimentation, discovery, and innovation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)765-781
Number of pages17
JournalEcosystems
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

rangeland
rangelands
Lakes
disturbance
lakes
lake
system boundary
property rights
social networks
self organization
Biodiversity
social network
vegetation cover
Land use
dynamic models
Ecosystems
Phosphorus
Sustainable development
Dynamic models
innovation

Keywords

  • Adaptive capacity
  • Adaptive cycle
  • Lake districts
  • Persistence
  • Rangelands
  • Resilience
  • Resistance
  • Self-organization
  • Socioecological system (SES)
  • Stability
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

From Metaphor to Measurement : Resilience of What to What? / Carpenter, Steve; Walker, Brian; Anderies, John; Abel, Nick.

In: Ecosystems, Vol. 4, No. 8, 2001, p. 765-781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carpenter, Steve ; Walker, Brian ; Anderies, John ; Abel, Nick. / From Metaphor to Measurement : Resilience of What to What?. In: Ecosystems. 2001 ; Vol. 4, No. 8. pp. 765-781.
@article{b28a2d169f644dd2b4a033c9b42951b8,
title = "From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?",
abstract = "Resilience is the magnitude of disturbance that can be tolerated before a socioecological system (SES) moves to a different region of state space controlled by a different set of processes. Resilience has multiple levels of meaning: As a metaphor related to sustainability, as a property of dynamic models, and as a measurable quantity that can be assessed in field studies of SES. The operational indicators of resilience have, however, received little attention in the literature. To assess a system's resilience, one must specify which system configuration and which disturbances are of interest. This paper compares resilience properties in two contrasting SES, lake districts and rangelands, with respect to the following three general features: (a) The ability of an SES to stay in the domain of attraction is related to slowly changing variables, or slowly changing disturbance regimes, which control the boundaries of the domain of attraction or the frequency of events that could push the system across the boundaries. Examples are soil phosphorus content in lake districts woody vegetation cover in rangelands, and property rights systems that affect land use in both lake districts and rangelands. (b) The ability of an SES to self-organize is related to the extent to which reorganization is endogenous rather than forced by external drivers. Self-organization is enhanced by coevolved ecosystem components and the presence of social networks that facilitate innovative problem solving. (c) The adaptive capacity of an SES is related to the existence of mechanisms for the evolution of novelty or learning. Examples include biodiversity at multiple scales and the existence of institutions that facilitate experimentation, discovery, and innovation.",
keywords = "Adaptive capacity, Adaptive cycle, Lake districts, Persistence, Rangelands, Resilience, Resistance, Self-organization, Socioecological system (SES), Stability, Sustainability",
author = "Steve Carpenter and Brian Walker and John Anderies and Nick Abel",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "765--781",
journal = "Ecosystems",
issn = "1432-9840",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Metaphor to Measurement

T2 - Resilience of What to What?

AU - Carpenter, Steve

AU - Walker, Brian

AU - Anderies, John

AU - Abel, Nick

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Resilience is the magnitude of disturbance that can be tolerated before a socioecological system (SES) moves to a different region of state space controlled by a different set of processes. Resilience has multiple levels of meaning: As a metaphor related to sustainability, as a property of dynamic models, and as a measurable quantity that can be assessed in field studies of SES. The operational indicators of resilience have, however, received little attention in the literature. To assess a system's resilience, one must specify which system configuration and which disturbances are of interest. This paper compares resilience properties in two contrasting SES, lake districts and rangelands, with respect to the following three general features: (a) The ability of an SES to stay in the domain of attraction is related to slowly changing variables, or slowly changing disturbance regimes, which control the boundaries of the domain of attraction or the frequency of events that could push the system across the boundaries. Examples are soil phosphorus content in lake districts woody vegetation cover in rangelands, and property rights systems that affect land use in both lake districts and rangelands. (b) The ability of an SES to self-organize is related to the extent to which reorganization is endogenous rather than forced by external drivers. Self-organization is enhanced by coevolved ecosystem components and the presence of social networks that facilitate innovative problem solving. (c) The adaptive capacity of an SES is related to the existence of mechanisms for the evolution of novelty or learning. Examples include biodiversity at multiple scales and the existence of institutions that facilitate experimentation, discovery, and innovation.

AB - Resilience is the magnitude of disturbance that can be tolerated before a socioecological system (SES) moves to a different region of state space controlled by a different set of processes. Resilience has multiple levels of meaning: As a metaphor related to sustainability, as a property of dynamic models, and as a measurable quantity that can be assessed in field studies of SES. The operational indicators of resilience have, however, received little attention in the literature. To assess a system's resilience, one must specify which system configuration and which disturbances are of interest. This paper compares resilience properties in two contrasting SES, lake districts and rangelands, with respect to the following three general features: (a) The ability of an SES to stay in the domain of attraction is related to slowly changing variables, or slowly changing disturbance regimes, which control the boundaries of the domain of attraction or the frequency of events that could push the system across the boundaries. Examples are soil phosphorus content in lake districts woody vegetation cover in rangelands, and property rights systems that affect land use in both lake districts and rangelands. (b) The ability of an SES to self-organize is related to the extent to which reorganization is endogenous rather than forced by external drivers. Self-organization is enhanced by coevolved ecosystem components and the presence of social networks that facilitate innovative problem solving. (c) The adaptive capacity of an SES is related to the existence of mechanisms for the evolution of novelty or learning. Examples include biodiversity at multiple scales and the existence of institutions that facilitate experimentation, discovery, and innovation.

KW - Adaptive capacity

KW - Adaptive cycle

KW - Lake districts

KW - Persistence

KW - Rangelands

KW - Resilience

KW - Resistance

KW - Self-organization

KW - Socioecological system (SES)

KW - Stability

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035694989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035694989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9

DO - 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 765

EP - 781

JO - Ecosystems

JF - Ecosystems

SN - 1432-9840

IS - 8

ER -