Fricative envelope parameters and silent intervals in distinguishing ‘slit’ and ‘split’

Q. Summerfield, P. J. Bailey, J. Seton, Michael Dorman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two experiments, the minimal duration of silence between [s] and [lit] required to hear ‘split’ was shown to vary. More silence was required both when the durations of the fricative and vocalic segments were increased and when the intensity falltime of the fricative was reduced. The effect of segment duration is consistent with demonstrations of perceptual sensitivity to variations in speech rate found for other contrasts distinguished by temporal parameters. The effect of intensity fall-time can be added to the set of temporally distributed acoustical consequences of the articulation of a stop consonant to which perceptual sensitivity can be demonstrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-192
Number of pages12
JournalPhonetica
Volume38
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981

Fingerprint

slits
envelopes
intervals
sensitivity
experiment
Fricatives
Split
Articulation
Speech Rate
Experiment
Stop Consonants
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Fricative envelope parameters and silent intervals in distinguishing ‘slit’ and ‘split’. / Summerfield, Q.; Bailey, P. J.; Seton, J.; Dorman, Michael.

In: Phonetica, Vol. 38, No. 1-3, 1981, p. 181-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Summerfield, Q, Bailey, PJ, Seton, J & Dorman, M 1981, 'Fricative envelope parameters and silent intervals in distinguishing ‘slit’ and ‘split’', Phonetica, vol. 38, no. 1-3, pp. 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260022
Summerfield, Q. ; Bailey, P. J. ; Seton, J. ; Dorman, Michael. / Fricative envelope parameters and silent intervals in distinguishing ‘slit’ and ‘split’. In: Phonetica. 1981 ; Vol. 38, No. 1-3. pp. 181-192.
@article{523672df00b749f8b3783bb1cc31c350,
title = "Fricative envelope parameters and silent intervals in distinguishing ‘slit’ and ‘split’",
abstract = "In two experiments, the minimal duration of silence between [s] and [lit] required to hear ‘split’ was shown to vary. More silence was required both when the durations of the fricative and vocalic segments were increased and when the intensity falltime of the fricative was reduced. The effect of segment duration is consistent with demonstrations of perceptual sensitivity to variations in speech rate found for other contrasts distinguished by temporal parameters. The effect of intensity fall-time can be added to the set of temporally distributed acoustical consequences of the articulation of a stop consonant to which perceptual sensitivity can be demonstrated.",
author = "Q. Summerfield and Bailey, {P. J.} and J. Seton and Michael Dorman",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1159/000260022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "181--192",
journal = "Phonetica",
issn = "0031-8388",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fricative envelope parameters and silent intervals in distinguishing ‘slit’ and ‘split’

AU - Summerfield, Q.

AU - Bailey, P. J.

AU - Seton, J.

AU - Dorman, Michael

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - In two experiments, the minimal duration of silence between [s] and [lit] required to hear ‘split’ was shown to vary. More silence was required both when the durations of the fricative and vocalic segments were increased and when the intensity falltime of the fricative was reduced. The effect of segment duration is consistent with demonstrations of perceptual sensitivity to variations in speech rate found for other contrasts distinguished by temporal parameters. The effect of intensity fall-time can be added to the set of temporally distributed acoustical consequences of the articulation of a stop consonant to which perceptual sensitivity can be demonstrated.

AB - In two experiments, the minimal duration of silence between [s] and [lit] required to hear ‘split’ was shown to vary. More silence was required both when the durations of the fricative and vocalic segments were increased and when the intensity falltime of the fricative was reduced. The effect of segment duration is consistent with demonstrations of perceptual sensitivity to variations in speech rate found for other contrasts distinguished by temporal parameters. The effect of intensity fall-time can be added to the set of temporally distributed acoustical consequences of the articulation of a stop consonant to which perceptual sensitivity can be demonstrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925971822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925971822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000260022

DO - 10.1159/000260022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925971822

VL - 38

SP - 181

EP - 192

JO - Phonetica

JF - Phonetica

SN - 0031-8388

IS - 1-3

ER -