Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults

Nicola Cellini, Elizabeth A. McDevitt, Sara C. Mednick, Matthew Buman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a growing need for free-living monitoring of the full 24 h spectrum of behaviors with a single or integrated set of sensors. The validity of field standard wearable monitors in sleep and physical activity have yet to be assessed for the complementary behavior in the context of 24 h continuous monitoring. We conducted a free-living comparison study of the Actigraph GT3X+ (GT3X+) to assess sleep parameters as compared with the Actiwatch-64 (AW-64) and concurrently, the AW-64 to assess sedentary and physical activity behaviors as compared with the GT3X+. Thirty young adults (15 female, 19.2 ± 0.86 years) wore both monitors for 3 consecutive days and 2 consecutive nights. Agreement of sleep, sedentary, and physical activity metrics were evaluated using analyses of variance, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots with associated confidence limits, mean absolute percentage of errors and equivalence tests. For sleep, the GT3X+ showed high agreement for total sleep time and sleep efficiency, but underestimated wakefulness after sleep onset and sleep onset latency relative to the AW-64. For sedentary behavior and physical activity, the AW-64 showed a moderate agreement for activity energy expenditure, but not for sedentary, light or moderate-vigorous physical activities relative to the GT3X+. Overall our results showed good agreement of the GT3X+ with AW-64 for assessing sleep but a lack of agreement between AW-64 and GT3X+ for physical activity and sedentary behaviors. These results are likely due to the monitor placement (wrist vs hip), as well as the algorithm employed to score the data. Future validation work of existing and emerging technologies that may hold promise for 24 h continuous monitoring is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-86
Number of pages8
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume157
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Sleep
Exercise
Physical Activity
Young Adults
Monitor
Wakefulness
Wrist
Energy Metabolism
Hip
Analysis of Variance
Technology
Light
Monitoring

Keywords

  • Actigraphy
  • Activity energy expenditure
  • Bland-Altman
  • Free-living environment
  • Health behaviors
  • Sleep-wake pattern

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults. / Cellini, Nicola; McDevitt, Elizabeth A.; Mednick, Sara C.; Buman, Matthew.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 157, 01.04.2016, p. 79-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{277e6fec57704beb882c07dd039954bb,
title = "Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults",
abstract = "There is a growing need for free-living monitoring of the full 24 h spectrum of behaviors with a single or integrated set of sensors. The validity of field standard wearable monitors in sleep and physical activity have yet to be assessed for the complementary behavior in the context of 24 h continuous monitoring. We conducted a free-living comparison study of the Actigraph GT3X+ (GT3X+) to assess sleep parameters as compared with the Actiwatch-64 (AW-64) and concurrently, the AW-64 to assess sedentary and physical activity behaviors as compared with the GT3X+. Thirty young adults (15 female, 19.2 ± 0.86 years) wore both monitors for 3 consecutive days and 2 consecutive nights. Agreement of sleep, sedentary, and physical activity metrics were evaluated using analyses of variance, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots with associated confidence limits, mean absolute percentage of errors and equivalence tests. For sleep, the GT3X+ showed high agreement for total sleep time and sleep efficiency, but underestimated wakefulness after sleep onset and sleep onset latency relative to the AW-64. For sedentary behavior and physical activity, the AW-64 showed a moderate agreement for activity energy expenditure, but not for sedentary, light or moderate-vigorous physical activities relative to the GT3X+. Overall our results showed good agreement of the GT3X+ with AW-64 for assessing sleep but a lack of agreement between AW-64 and GT3X+ for physical activity and sedentary behaviors. These results are likely due to the monitor placement (wrist vs hip), as well as the algorithm employed to score the data. Future validation work of existing and emerging technologies that may hold promise for 24 h continuous monitoring is needed.",
keywords = "Actigraphy, Activity energy expenditure, Bland-Altman, Free-living environment, Health behaviors, Sleep-wake pattern",
author = "Nicola Cellini and McDevitt, {Elizabeth A.} and Mednick, {Sara C.} and Matthew Buman",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "157",
pages = "79--86",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults

AU - Cellini, Nicola

AU - McDevitt, Elizabeth A.

AU - Mednick, Sara C.

AU - Buman, Matthew

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - There is a growing need for free-living monitoring of the full 24 h spectrum of behaviors with a single or integrated set of sensors. The validity of field standard wearable monitors in sleep and physical activity have yet to be assessed for the complementary behavior in the context of 24 h continuous monitoring. We conducted a free-living comparison study of the Actigraph GT3X+ (GT3X+) to assess sleep parameters as compared with the Actiwatch-64 (AW-64) and concurrently, the AW-64 to assess sedentary and physical activity behaviors as compared with the GT3X+. Thirty young adults (15 female, 19.2 ± 0.86 years) wore both monitors for 3 consecutive days and 2 consecutive nights. Agreement of sleep, sedentary, and physical activity metrics were evaluated using analyses of variance, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots with associated confidence limits, mean absolute percentage of errors and equivalence tests. For sleep, the GT3X+ showed high agreement for total sleep time and sleep efficiency, but underestimated wakefulness after sleep onset and sleep onset latency relative to the AW-64. For sedentary behavior and physical activity, the AW-64 showed a moderate agreement for activity energy expenditure, but not for sedentary, light or moderate-vigorous physical activities relative to the GT3X+. Overall our results showed good agreement of the GT3X+ with AW-64 for assessing sleep but a lack of agreement between AW-64 and GT3X+ for physical activity and sedentary behaviors. These results are likely due to the monitor placement (wrist vs hip), as well as the algorithm employed to score the data. Future validation work of existing and emerging technologies that may hold promise for 24 h continuous monitoring is needed.

AB - There is a growing need for free-living monitoring of the full 24 h spectrum of behaviors with a single or integrated set of sensors. The validity of field standard wearable monitors in sleep and physical activity have yet to be assessed for the complementary behavior in the context of 24 h continuous monitoring. We conducted a free-living comparison study of the Actigraph GT3X+ (GT3X+) to assess sleep parameters as compared with the Actiwatch-64 (AW-64) and concurrently, the AW-64 to assess sedentary and physical activity behaviors as compared with the GT3X+. Thirty young adults (15 female, 19.2 ± 0.86 years) wore both monitors for 3 consecutive days and 2 consecutive nights. Agreement of sleep, sedentary, and physical activity metrics were evaluated using analyses of variance, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots with associated confidence limits, mean absolute percentage of errors and equivalence tests. For sleep, the GT3X+ showed high agreement for total sleep time and sleep efficiency, but underestimated wakefulness after sleep onset and sleep onset latency relative to the AW-64. For sedentary behavior and physical activity, the AW-64 showed a moderate agreement for activity energy expenditure, but not for sedentary, light or moderate-vigorous physical activities relative to the GT3X+. Overall our results showed good agreement of the GT3X+ with AW-64 for assessing sleep but a lack of agreement between AW-64 and GT3X+ for physical activity and sedentary behaviors. These results are likely due to the monitor placement (wrist vs hip), as well as the algorithm employed to score the data. Future validation work of existing and emerging technologies that may hold promise for 24 h continuous monitoring is needed.

KW - Actigraphy

KW - Activity energy expenditure

KW - Bland-Altman

KW - Free-living environment

KW - Health behaviors

KW - Sleep-wake pattern

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956693324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956693324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.034

DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 26821185

AN - SCOPUS:84956693324

VL - 157

SP - 79

EP - 86

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

ER -