Forest canopy damage and recovery in reduced-impact and conventional selective logging in eastern Para, Brazil

Rodrigo Pereira, Johan Zweede, Gregory P. Asner, Michael Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated ground and canopy damage and recovery following conventional logging and reduced-impact logging (RIL) of moist tropical forest in the eastern Amazon of Brazil. Paired conventional and RIL blocks were selectively logged with a harvest intensity of approximately 23 m3 ha-1 (geometric volume) in the dry seasons (July-December) of 1996 and 1998. Ground damage (roads + skid trails + log decks) in the conventional logging treatments occupied 8.9-11.2% of total operational area. In contrast, ground damage in RIL treatments ranged from 4.6 to 4.8% of the total area. Forest canopy damage was assessed using gap fraction measurements collected with an automated optical canopy analyzer (LAI-2000; Licor Inc.) in March 1999. Canopy opening varied by time since logging. The recently logged (1998) blocks had integrated canopy gap fractions of 21.6 and 10.9% of total area for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. The blocks logged in 1996 had more closed canopies with 16.5 and 4.9% gap fraction for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. For comparison, undisturbed forest had a canopy gap fraction of 3.1%. Measurements of ground disturbance and gap fraction using the Licor LAI-2000 generally agree with other field evaluations of RIL and conventional logging. Detailed understanding of canopy structural changes resulting from different logging intensities are critical to the prospect of logging damage estimation using current and future remote sensing products.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-89
Number of pages13
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume168
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

selective logging
forest canopy
logging
canopy
Brazil
damage
canopy gap
leaf area index
canopy gaps
structural change
tropical forest
dry season
road
remote sensing
disturbance
man-made trails
tropical forests
roads

Keywords

  • Amazon
  • Brazil
  • Canopy
  • Gap fraction
  • Reduced-impact logging
  • Selective logging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Forest canopy damage and recovery in reduced-impact and conventional selective logging in eastern Para, Brazil. / Pereira, Rodrigo; Zweede, Johan; Asner, Gregory P.; Keller, Michael.

In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 168, No. 1-3, 01.09.2002, p. 77-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d901c7b349442dfab1f3882dbe58514,
title = "Forest canopy damage and recovery in reduced-impact and conventional selective logging in eastern Para, Brazil",
abstract = "We investigated ground and canopy damage and recovery following conventional logging and reduced-impact logging (RIL) of moist tropical forest in the eastern Amazon of Brazil. Paired conventional and RIL blocks were selectively logged with a harvest intensity of approximately 23 m3 ha-1 (geometric volume) in the dry seasons (July-December) of 1996 and 1998. Ground damage (roads + skid trails + log decks) in the conventional logging treatments occupied 8.9-11.2{\%} of total operational area. In contrast, ground damage in RIL treatments ranged from 4.6 to 4.8{\%} of the total area. Forest canopy damage was assessed using gap fraction measurements collected with an automated optical canopy analyzer (LAI-2000; Licor Inc.) in March 1999. Canopy opening varied by time since logging. The recently logged (1998) blocks had integrated canopy gap fractions of 21.6 and 10.9{\%} of total area for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. The blocks logged in 1996 had more closed canopies with 16.5 and 4.9{\%} gap fraction for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. For comparison, undisturbed forest had a canopy gap fraction of 3.1{\%}. Measurements of ground disturbance and gap fraction using the Licor LAI-2000 generally agree with other field evaluations of RIL and conventional logging. Detailed understanding of canopy structural changes resulting from different logging intensities are critical to the prospect of logging damage estimation using current and future remote sensing products.",
keywords = "Amazon, Brazil, Canopy, Gap fraction, Reduced-impact logging, Selective logging",
author = "Rodrigo Pereira and Johan Zweede and Asner, {Gregory P.} and Michael Keller",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00732-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "168",
pages = "77--89",
journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
issn = "0378-1127",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forest canopy damage and recovery in reduced-impact and conventional selective logging in eastern Para, Brazil

AU - Pereira, Rodrigo

AU - Zweede, Johan

AU - Asner, Gregory P.

AU - Keller, Michael

PY - 2002/9/1

Y1 - 2002/9/1

N2 - We investigated ground and canopy damage and recovery following conventional logging and reduced-impact logging (RIL) of moist tropical forest in the eastern Amazon of Brazil. Paired conventional and RIL blocks were selectively logged with a harvest intensity of approximately 23 m3 ha-1 (geometric volume) in the dry seasons (July-December) of 1996 and 1998. Ground damage (roads + skid trails + log decks) in the conventional logging treatments occupied 8.9-11.2% of total operational area. In contrast, ground damage in RIL treatments ranged from 4.6 to 4.8% of the total area. Forest canopy damage was assessed using gap fraction measurements collected with an automated optical canopy analyzer (LAI-2000; Licor Inc.) in March 1999. Canopy opening varied by time since logging. The recently logged (1998) blocks had integrated canopy gap fractions of 21.6 and 10.9% of total area for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. The blocks logged in 1996 had more closed canopies with 16.5 and 4.9% gap fraction for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. For comparison, undisturbed forest had a canopy gap fraction of 3.1%. Measurements of ground disturbance and gap fraction using the Licor LAI-2000 generally agree with other field evaluations of RIL and conventional logging. Detailed understanding of canopy structural changes resulting from different logging intensities are critical to the prospect of logging damage estimation using current and future remote sensing products.

AB - We investigated ground and canopy damage and recovery following conventional logging and reduced-impact logging (RIL) of moist tropical forest in the eastern Amazon of Brazil. Paired conventional and RIL blocks were selectively logged with a harvest intensity of approximately 23 m3 ha-1 (geometric volume) in the dry seasons (July-December) of 1996 and 1998. Ground damage (roads + skid trails + log decks) in the conventional logging treatments occupied 8.9-11.2% of total operational area. In contrast, ground damage in RIL treatments ranged from 4.6 to 4.8% of the total area. Forest canopy damage was assessed using gap fraction measurements collected with an automated optical canopy analyzer (LAI-2000; Licor Inc.) in March 1999. Canopy opening varied by time since logging. The recently logged (1998) blocks had integrated canopy gap fractions of 21.6 and 10.9% of total area for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. The blocks logged in 1996 had more closed canopies with 16.5 and 4.9% gap fraction for conventional and RIL blocks, respectively. For comparison, undisturbed forest had a canopy gap fraction of 3.1%. Measurements of ground disturbance and gap fraction using the Licor LAI-2000 generally agree with other field evaluations of RIL and conventional logging. Detailed understanding of canopy structural changes resulting from different logging intensities are critical to the prospect of logging damage estimation using current and future remote sensing products.

KW - Amazon

KW - Brazil

KW - Canopy

KW - Gap fraction

KW - Reduced-impact logging

KW - Selective logging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036723053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036723053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00732-0

DO - 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00732-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036723053

VL - 168

SP - 77

EP - 89

JO - Forest Ecology and Management

JF - Forest Ecology and Management

SN - 0378-1127

IS - 1-3

ER -