Food marketing to children through toys

Response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance

Jennifer J. Otten, Eric B. Hekler, Rebecca A. Krukowski, Matthew Buman, Brian E. Saelens, Christopher D. Gardner, Abby C. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On August 9, 2010, Santa Clara County CA became the first U.S. jurisdiction to implement an ordinance that prohibits the distribution of toys and other incentives to children in conjunction with meals, foods, or beverages that do not meet minimal nutritional criteria. Restaurants had many different options for complying with this ordinance, such as introducing more healthful menu options, reformulating current menu items, or changing marketing or toy distribution practices. To assess how ordinance-affected restaurants changed their child menus, marketing, and toy distribution practices relative to non-affected restaurants. Children's menu items and child-directed marketing and toy distribution practices were examined before and at two time points after ordinance implementation (from July through November 2010) at ordinance-affected fast-food restaurants compared with demographically matched unaffected same-chain restaurants using the Children's Menu Assessment tool. Affected restaurants showed a 2.8- to 3.4-fold improvement in Children's Menu Assessment scores from pre- to post-ordinance with minimal changes at unaffected restaurants. Response to the ordinance varied by restaurant. Improvements were seen in on-site nutritional guidance; promotion of healthy meals, beverages, and side items; and toy marketing and distribution activities. The ordinance appears to have positively influenced marketing of healthful menu items and toys as well as toy distribution practices at ordinance-affected restaurants, but did not affect the number of healthful food items offered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-60
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Restaurants
Play and Playthings
Marketing
Food
Meals
Fast Foods
Food and Beverages
Beverages
Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Food marketing to children through toys : Response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance. / Otten, Jennifer J.; Hekler, Eric B.; Krukowski, Rebecca A.; Buman, Matthew; Saelens, Brian E.; Gardner, Christopher D.; King, Abby C.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 56-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Otten, Jennifer J. ; Hekler, Eric B. ; Krukowski, Rebecca A. ; Buman, Matthew ; Saelens, Brian E. ; Gardner, Christopher D. ; King, Abby C. / Food marketing to children through toys : Response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 56-60.
@article{fb0f57c3349a4021bd56e7974b45b2ee,
title = "Food marketing to children through toys: Response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance",
abstract = "On August 9, 2010, Santa Clara County CA became the first U.S. jurisdiction to implement an ordinance that prohibits the distribution of toys and other incentives to children in conjunction with meals, foods, or beverages that do not meet minimal nutritional criteria. Restaurants had many different options for complying with this ordinance, such as introducing more healthful menu options, reformulating current menu items, or changing marketing or toy distribution practices. To assess how ordinance-affected restaurants changed their child menus, marketing, and toy distribution practices relative to non-affected restaurants. Children's menu items and child-directed marketing and toy distribution practices were examined before and at two time points after ordinance implementation (from July through November 2010) at ordinance-affected fast-food restaurants compared with demographically matched unaffected same-chain restaurants using the Children's Menu Assessment tool. Affected restaurants showed a 2.8- to 3.4-fold improvement in Children's Menu Assessment scores from pre- to post-ordinance with minimal changes at unaffected restaurants. Response to the ordinance varied by restaurant. Improvements were seen in on-site nutritional guidance; promotion of healthy meals, beverages, and side items; and toy marketing and distribution activities. The ordinance appears to have positively influenced marketing of healthful menu items and toys as well as toy distribution practices at ordinance-affected restaurants, but did not affect the number of healthful food items offered.",
author = "Otten, {Jennifer J.} and Hekler, {Eric B.} and Krukowski, {Rebecca A.} and Matthew Buman and Saelens, {Brian E.} and Gardner, {Christopher D.} and King, {Abby C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "56--60",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food marketing to children through toys

T2 - Response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance

AU - Otten, Jennifer J.

AU - Hekler, Eric B.

AU - Krukowski, Rebecca A.

AU - Buman, Matthew

AU - Saelens, Brian E.

AU - Gardner, Christopher D.

AU - King, Abby C.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - On August 9, 2010, Santa Clara County CA became the first U.S. jurisdiction to implement an ordinance that prohibits the distribution of toys and other incentives to children in conjunction with meals, foods, or beverages that do not meet minimal nutritional criteria. Restaurants had many different options for complying with this ordinance, such as introducing more healthful menu options, reformulating current menu items, or changing marketing or toy distribution practices. To assess how ordinance-affected restaurants changed their child menus, marketing, and toy distribution practices relative to non-affected restaurants. Children's menu items and child-directed marketing and toy distribution practices were examined before and at two time points after ordinance implementation (from July through November 2010) at ordinance-affected fast-food restaurants compared with demographically matched unaffected same-chain restaurants using the Children's Menu Assessment tool. Affected restaurants showed a 2.8- to 3.4-fold improvement in Children's Menu Assessment scores from pre- to post-ordinance with minimal changes at unaffected restaurants. Response to the ordinance varied by restaurant. Improvements were seen in on-site nutritional guidance; promotion of healthy meals, beverages, and side items; and toy marketing and distribution activities. The ordinance appears to have positively influenced marketing of healthful menu items and toys as well as toy distribution practices at ordinance-affected restaurants, but did not affect the number of healthful food items offered.

AB - On August 9, 2010, Santa Clara County CA became the first U.S. jurisdiction to implement an ordinance that prohibits the distribution of toys and other incentives to children in conjunction with meals, foods, or beverages that do not meet minimal nutritional criteria. Restaurants had many different options for complying with this ordinance, such as introducing more healthful menu options, reformulating current menu items, or changing marketing or toy distribution practices. To assess how ordinance-affected restaurants changed their child menus, marketing, and toy distribution practices relative to non-affected restaurants. Children's menu items and child-directed marketing and toy distribution practices were examined before and at two time points after ordinance implementation (from July through November 2010) at ordinance-affected fast-food restaurants compared with demographically matched unaffected same-chain restaurants using the Children's Menu Assessment tool. Affected restaurants showed a 2.8- to 3.4-fold improvement in Children's Menu Assessment scores from pre- to post-ordinance with minimal changes at unaffected restaurants. Response to the ordinance varied by restaurant. Improvements were seen in on-site nutritional guidance; promotion of healthy meals, beverages, and side items; and toy marketing and distribution activities. The ordinance appears to have positively influenced marketing of healthful menu items and toys as well as toy distribution practices at ordinance-affected restaurants, but did not affect the number of healthful food items offered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155179204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84155179204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.020

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.020

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 56

EP - 60

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 1

ER -