Flashover mechanism of non-ceramic insulators

George G. Karady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contamination performance of non-ceramic (NC) insulators is better than porcelain insulators. The paper describes the pollution collection mechanism and concludes that silicone rubber insulators coiled more pollution than porcelain insulators. Long term exposure of silicone rubber insulators produces a thin layer of pollution, which is a mixture of dust, salt and silicone oil. Fog or morning dew produces droplets on the flat surfaces and forms conductive regions. Spot discharge starts between the regions, which reduces hydrophobicity. Simultaneously, dry-band arcing starts on the shank of the insulator. The two arcs join together, which leads to flashover. The flashover voltage of polluted NC insulators is significantly higher than porcelain ones. Insulator performance is measured with laboratory tests. However, salt-fog and clean-fog tests can give different flashover values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)718-723
Number of pages6
JournalIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Flashover
Porcelain
Fog
Silicones
Pollution
Rubber
Salts
Hydrophobicity
Discharge (fluid mechanics)
Dust
Contamination
Electric potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Flashover mechanism of non-ceramic insulators. / Karady, George G.

In: IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Vol. 6, No. 5, 1999, p. 718-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1680c50de44747559d577b826334d6b6,
title = "Flashover mechanism of non-ceramic insulators",
abstract = "The contamination performance of non-ceramic (NC) insulators is better than porcelain insulators. The paper describes the pollution collection mechanism and concludes that silicone rubber insulators coiled more pollution than porcelain insulators. Long term exposure of silicone rubber insulators produces a thin layer of pollution, which is a mixture of dust, salt and silicone oil. Fog or morning dew produces droplets on the flat surfaces and forms conductive regions. Spot discharge starts between the regions, which reduces hydrophobicity. Simultaneously, dry-band arcing starts on the shank of the insulator. The two arcs join together, which leads to flashover. The flashover voltage of polluted NC insulators is significantly higher than porcelain ones. Insulator performance is measured with laboratory tests. However, salt-fog and clean-fog tests can give different flashover values.",
author = "Karady, {George G.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1109/94.798128",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "718--723",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation",
issn = "1070-9878",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flashover mechanism of non-ceramic insulators

AU - Karady, George G.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - The contamination performance of non-ceramic (NC) insulators is better than porcelain insulators. The paper describes the pollution collection mechanism and concludes that silicone rubber insulators coiled more pollution than porcelain insulators. Long term exposure of silicone rubber insulators produces a thin layer of pollution, which is a mixture of dust, salt and silicone oil. Fog or morning dew produces droplets on the flat surfaces and forms conductive regions. Spot discharge starts between the regions, which reduces hydrophobicity. Simultaneously, dry-band arcing starts on the shank of the insulator. The two arcs join together, which leads to flashover. The flashover voltage of polluted NC insulators is significantly higher than porcelain ones. Insulator performance is measured with laboratory tests. However, salt-fog and clean-fog tests can give different flashover values.

AB - The contamination performance of non-ceramic (NC) insulators is better than porcelain insulators. The paper describes the pollution collection mechanism and concludes that silicone rubber insulators coiled more pollution than porcelain insulators. Long term exposure of silicone rubber insulators produces a thin layer of pollution, which is a mixture of dust, salt and silicone oil. Fog or morning dew produces droplets on the flat surfaces and forms conductive regions. Spot discharge starts between the regions, which reduces hydrophobicity. Simultaneously, dry-band arcing starts on the shank of the insulator. The two arcs join together, which leads to flashover. The flashover voltage of polluted NC insulators is significantly higher than porcelain ones. Insulator performance is measured with laboratory tests. However, salt-fog and clean-fog tests can give different flashover values.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033316790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033316790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/94.798128

DO - 10.1109/94.798128

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033316790

VL - 6

SP - 718

EP - 723

JO - IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation

JF - IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation

SN - 1070-9878

IS - 5

ER -