Flash Flood Risk and the Paradox of Urban Development

Susan L. Cutter, Christopher T. Emrich, Melanie Gall, Rachel Reeves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper traces the historic development of flood risk and the antecedent conditions that contributed to the catastrophic consequences in central South Carolina as the result of the 2015 flash flood. The study draws on archival and contextual research to underscore development paradoxes: the safe development paradox - federal policies aimed at making hazardous areas safer that have resulted in just the opposite - and the local government paradox - local governments permitting development of hazardous areas through lax land-use regulations and zoning while their residents bear the burden of hazards events. These paradoxes are used to illustrate the rapid development of an urban watershed and associated increase in flood risk. A chronology of development patterns from the 1930s with the expansion of the central core urbanized footprint of Columbia shows an increasing level of flood risk exposure as creeks were channelized, ornamental lakes developed, and high-end housing built, all with local government approval. In contrast, the uptake of National Flood Insurance policies remained below national averages for the level of risk in the region especially in the urbanized areas. Unabated hazard exposure and lack of mitigation set the stage for the significant losses incurred in the 2015 flood event and the uneven spatial variability in impacts. Unlike the impacts of Hurricane Katrina or the 2016 Louisiana flash floods, the burden of flood losses fell mostly on residents who could afford to bear the loss. With the exception of the discussion about buy-outs, this catastrophic flash flood event did not lead to a review of or change in land use, building, or zoning ordinances. Instead, the relatively quick residential recovery allowed the community to return to its predisaster state with seemingly few lessons learned.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number05017005
JournalNatural Hazards Review
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

flash flood
urban development
natural disaster
local government
Zoning
zoning
Land use
hazard
antecedent conditions
land use
Hazards
Flood insurance
event
footprint
hurricane
resident
chronology
Hurricanes
federal policy
mitigation

Keywords

  • Development paradoxes
  • Flash floods
  • Residential recovery
  • Social sciences
  • South Carolina

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Flash Flood Risk and the Paradox of Urban Development. / Cutter, Susan L.; Emrich, Christopher T.; Gall, Melanie; Reeves, Rachel.

In: Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 05017005, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cutter, Susan L. ; Emrich, Christopher T. ; Gall, Melanie ; Reeves, Rachel. / Flash Flood Risk and the Paradox of Urban Development. In: Natural Hazards Review. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. 1.
@article{9420d3a4f818402f93067c2813d7d7ef,
title = "Flash Flood Risk and the Paradox of Urban Development",
abstract = "This paper traces the historic development of flood risk and the antecedent conditions that contributed to the catastrophic consequences in central South Carolina as the result of the 2015 flash flood. The study draws on archival and contextual research to underscore development paradoxes: the safe development paradox - federal policies aimed at making hazardous areas safer that have resulted in just the opposite - and the local government paradox - local governments permitting development of hazardous areas through lax land-use regulations and zoning while their residents bear the burden of hazards events. These paradoxes are used to illustrate the rapid development of an urban watershed and associated increase in flood risk. A chronology of development patterns from the 1930s with the expansion of the central core urbanized footprint of Columbia shows an increasing level of flood risk exposure as creeks were channelized, ornamental lakes developed, and high-end housing built, all with local government approval. In contrast, the uptake of National Flood Insurance policies remained below national averages for the level of risk in the region especially in the urbanized areas. Unabated hazard exposure and lack of mitigation set the stage for the significant losses incurred in the 2015 flood event and the uneven spatial variability in impacts. Unlike the impacts of Hurricane Katrina or the 2016 Louisiana flash floods, the burden of flood losses fell mostly on residents who could afford to bear the loss. With the exception of the discussion about buy-outs, this catastrophic flash flood event did not lead to a review of or change in land use, building, or zoning ordinances. Instead, the relatively quick residential recovery allowed the community to return to its predisaster state with seemingly few lessons learned.",
keywords = "Development paradoxes, Flash floods, Residential recovery, Social sciences, South Carolina",
author = "Cutter, {Susan L.} and Emrich, {Christopher T.} and Melanie Gall and Rachel Reeves",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000268",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Natural Hazards Review",
issn = "1527-6988",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flash Flood Risk and the Paradox of Urban Development

AU - Cutter, Susan L.

AU - Emrich, Christopher T.

AU - Gall, Melanie

AU - Reeves, Rachel

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - This paper traces the historic development of flood risk and the antecedent conditions that contributed to the catastrophic consequences in central South Carolina as the result of the 2015 flash flood. The study draws on archival and contextual research to underscore development paradoxes: the safe development paradox - federal policies aimed at making hazardous areas safer that have resulted in just the opposite - and the local government paradox - local governments permitting development of hazardous areas through lax land-use regulations and zoning while their residents bear the burden of hazards events. These paradoxes are used to illustrate the rapid development of an urban watershed and associated increase in flood risk. A chronology of development patterns from the 1930s with the expansion of the central core urbanized footprint of Columbia shows an increasing level of flood risk exposure as creeks were channelized, ornamental lakes developed, and high-end housing built, all with local government approval. In contrast, the uptake of National Flood Insurance policies remained below national averages for the level of risk in the region especially in the urbanized areas. Unabated hazard exposure and lack of mitigation set the stage for the significant losses incurred in the 2015 flood event and the uneven spatial variability in impacts. Unlike the impacts of Hurricane Katrina or the 2016 Louisiana flash floods, the burden of flood losses fell mostly on residents who could afford to bear the loss. With the exception of the discussion about buy-outs, this catastrophic flash flood event did not lead to a review of or change in land use, building, or zoning ordinances. Instead, the relatively quick residential recovery allowed the community to return to its predisaster state with seemingly few lessons learned.

AB - This paper traces the historic development of flood risk and the antecedent conditions that contributed to the catastrophic consequences in central South Carolina as the result of the 2015 flash flood. The study draws on archival and contextual research to underscore development paradoxes: the safe development paradox - federal policies aimed at making hazardous areas safer that have resulted in just the opposite - and the local government paradox - local governments permitting development of hazardous areas through lax land-use regulations and zoning while their residents bear the burden of hazards events. These paradoxes are used to illustrate the rapid development of an urban watershed and associated increase in flood risk. A chronology of development patterns from the 1930s with the expansion of the central core urbanized footprint of Columbia shows an increasing level of flood risk exposure as creeks were channelized, ornamental lakes developed, and high-end housing built, all with local government approval. In contrast, the uptake of National Flood Insurance policies remained below national averages for the level of risk in the region especially in the urbanized areas. Unabated hazard exposure and lack of mitigation set the stage for the significant losses incurred in the 2015 flood event and the uneven spatial variability in impacts. Unlike the impacts of Hurricane Katrina or the 2016 Louisiana flash floods, the burden of flood losses fell mostly on residents who could afford to bear the loss. With the exception of the discussion about buy-outs, this catastrophic flash flood event did not lead to a review of or change in land use, building, or zoning ordinances. Instead, the relatively quick residential recovery allowed the community to return to its predisaster state with seemingly few lessons learned.

KW - Development paradoxes

KW - Flash floods

KW - Residential recovery

KW - Social sciences

KW - South Carolina

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029911568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029911568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000268

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000268

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029911568

VL - 19

JO - Natural Hazards Review

JF - Natural Hazards Review

SN - 1527-6988

IS - 1

M1 - 05017005

ER -