Five years of bryn mawr classical review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Bryn Mawr Classical Review will be five years old in the fall of 1995. What have we learned? Where are we going? Are we old-fashioned yet? Are we a classic? Are we obsolete? If we go on giving it away, will people think it is only worth what they paid for it?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-228
Number of pages6
JournalSerials Librarian
Volume28
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 1996
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Five years of bryn mawr classical review. / O'Donnell, James.

In: Serials Librarian, Vol. 28, No. 3-4, 22.04.1996, p. 223-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Donnell, James. / Five years of bryn mawr classical review. In: Serials Librarian. 1996 ; Vol. 28, No. 3-4. pp. 223-228.
@article{4685c8cf73b04211a8740de2e0dd78a8,
title = "Five years of bryn mawr classical review",
abstract = "Bryn Mawr Classical Review will be five years old in the fall of 1995. What have we learned? Where are we going? Are we old-fashioned yet? Are we a classic? Are we obsolete? If we go on giving it away, will people think it is only worth what they paid for it?",
author = "James O'Donnell",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1300/J123v28n03_04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "223--228",
journal = "Serials Librarian",
issn = "0361-526X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five years of bryn mawr classical review

AU - O'Donnell, James

PY - 1996/4/22

Y1 - 1996/4/22

N2 - Bryn Mawr Classical Review will be five years old in the fall of 1995. What have we learned? Where are we going? Are we old-fashioned yet? Are we a classic? Are we obsolete? If we go on giving it away, will people think it is only worth what they paid for it?

AB - Bryn Mawr Classical Review will be five years old in the fall of 1995. What have we learned? Where are we going? Are we old-fashioned yet? Are we a classic? Are we obsolete? If we go on giving it away, will people think it is only worth what they paid for it?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009561173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009561173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J123v28n03_04

DO - 10.1300/J123v28n03_04

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009561173

VL - 28

SP - 223

EP - 228

JO - Serials Librarian

JF - Serials Librarian

SN - 0361-526X

IS - 3-4

ER -