Fishing gear substitution to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts: An example of social-ecological research to inform policy

Lekelia Jenkins, Karen Garrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of gear substitution as a means to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts of fisheries, using a social-ecological systems approach. The U.S. west coast sablefish fishery is an excellent subject for this study, because it permits three different gear types and has a problem with bycatch of overfished species. Bycatch rates were highest in trawls and lowest in pots. Combining interview data with findings from a previous study, affirmed that habitat impacts were highest with trawls and lowest with longlines. Interviews with 44 individuals analyzed using grounded theory yielded several common themes in the opinions of gear substitution. Positive opinion themes included that it would allow better management of the fish populations by reducing bycatch and would allow more business options, flexibility, and increased profit for some trawlers. The main negative opinion theme was that gear substitution could decrease landings needed to support shoreside infrastructure. Most stakeholder groups saw some benefit in gear substitution. Notably, the trawlers voiced a unanimous preference for converting to pots rather than longlines. A scenario analysis revealed that the preferable management option would be long-term gear conversion, but incentives are likely to be an important means of encouraging gear conversion. This ecological impacts rapid assessment provided a regional evaluation of bycatch and habitat impacts that had never been conducted before for these gear types. It also provided scientific support for a regulatory change that legally allows trawlers to practice gear substitution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-303
Number of pages11
JournalMarine Policy
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fishing gear
bycatch
substitution
habitat
habitats
fishery
fishing boats
ecological system
ecological impact
interview
social system
management
grounded theory
interviews
incentive
fisheries
profit
stakeholder
Anoplopoma fimbria
flexibility

Keywords

  • Bycatch
  • Fishing gear conversion
  • Fishing gear substitution
  • Fishing gear switching
  • Habitat impacts
  • Social-ecological systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Law
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Fishing gear substitution to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts : An example of social-ecological research to inform policy. / Jenkins, Lekelia; Garrison, Karen.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 38, 01.03.2013, p. 293-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{640394398d174ec1907ced7b6d19ee9d,
title = "Fishing gear substitution to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts: An example of social-ecological research to inform policy",
abstract = "This study examined the feasibility of gear substitution as a means to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts of fisheries, using a social-ecological systems approach. The U.S. west coast sablefish fishery is an excellent subject for this study, because it permits three different gear types and has a problem with bycatch of overfished species. Bycatch rates were highest in trawls and lowest in pots. Combining interview data with findings from a previous study, affirmed that habitat impacts were highest with trawls and lowest with longlines. Interviews with 44 individuals analyzed using grounded theory yielded several common themes in the opinions of gear substitution. Positive opinion themes included that it would allow better management of the fish populations by reducing bycatch and would allow more business options, flexibility, and increased profit for some trawlers. The main negative opinion theme was that gear substitution could decrease landings needed to support shoreside infrastructure. Most stakeholder groups saw some benefit in gear substitution. Notably, the trawlers voiced a unanimous preference for converting to pots rather than longlines. A scenario analysis revealed that the preferable management option would be long-term gear conversion, but incentives are likely to be an important means of encouraging gear conversion. This ecological impacts rapid assessment provided a regional evaluation of bycatch and habitat impacts that had never been conducted before for these gear types. It also provided scientific support for a regulatory change that legally allows trawlers to practice gear substitution.",
keywords = "Bycatch, Fishing gear conversion, Fishing gear substitution, Fishing gear switching, Habitat impacts, Social-ecological systems",
author = "Lekelia Jenkins and Karen Garrison",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "293--303",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fishing gear substitution to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts

T2 - An example of social-ecological research to inform policy

AU - Jenkins, Lekelia

AU - Garrison, Karen

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - This study examined the feasibility of gear substitution as a means to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts of fisheries, using a social-ecological systems approach. The U.S. west coast sablefish fishery is an excellent subject for this study, because it permits three different gear types and has a problem with bycatch of overfished species. Bycatch rates were highest in trawls and lowest in pots. Combining interview data with findings from a previous study, affirmed that habitat impacts were highest with trawls and lowest with longlines. Interviews with 44 individuals analyzed using grounded theory yielded several common themes in the opinions of gear substitution. Positive opinion themes included that it would allow better management of the fish populations by reducing bycatch and would allow more business options, flexibility, and increased profit for some trawlers. The main negative opinion theme was that gear substitution could decrease landings needed to support shoreside infrastructure. Most stakeholder groups saw some benefit in gear substitution. Notably, the trawlers voiced a unanimous preference for converting to pots rather than longlines. A scenario analysis revealed that the preferable management option would be long-term gear conversion, but incentives are likely to be an important means of encouraging gear conversion. This ecological impacts rapid assessment provided a regional evaluation of bycatch and habitat impacts that had never been conducted before for these gear types. It also provided scientific support for a regulatory change that legally allows trawlers to practice gear substitution.

AB - This study examined the feasibility of gear substitution as a means to reduce bycatch and habitat impacts of fisheries, using a social-ecological systems approach. The U.S. west coast sablefish fishery is an excellent subject for this study, because it permits three different gear types and has a problem with bycatch of overfished species. Bycatch rates were highest in trawls and lowest in pots. Combining interview data with findings from a previous study, affirmed that habitat impacts were highest with trawls and lowest with longlines. Interviews with 44 individuals analyzed using grounded theory yielded several common themes in the opinions of gear substitution. Positive opinion themes included that it would allow better management of the fish populations by reducing bycatch and would allow more business options, flexibility, and increased profit for some trawlers. The main negative opinion theme was that gear substitution could decrease landings needed to support shoreside infrastructure. Most stakeholder groups saw some benefit in gear substitution. Notably, the trawlers voiced a unanimous preference for converting to pots rather than longlines. A scenario analysis revealed that the preferable management option would be long-term gear conversion, but incentives are likely to be an important means of encouraging gear conversion. This ecological impacts rapid assessment provided a regional evaluation of bycatch and habitat impacts that had never been conducted before for these gear types. It also provided scientific support for a regulatory change that legally allows trawlers to practice gear substitution.

KW - Bycatch

KW - Fishing gear conversion

KW - Fishing gear substitution

KW - Fishing gear switching

KW - Habitat impacts

KW - Social-ecological systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908566304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908566304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908566304

VL - 38

SP - 293

EP - 303

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -