Fish

Friend or foe? Food policy and subpopulation warnings for consumers

Renee Hughner, Jill Kurp Maher, Nancy M. Childs, William E. Nganje

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fish is a healthy food that provides valuable nutrients for heart health and cognitive development. However, for some subpopulations, consuming fish containing higher levels of methylmercury may pose a health risk. This research seeks to identify the impact of including a seafood warning disclosure in the advertisement of a can of tuna fish on consumers' purchasing behaviors. An experimental survey is employed to examine the resulting impact for two segments of the population - those considered at risk for methylmercury overexposure and all others. Findings indicate the use of warning disclosures increases respondents' negative product perceptions without significantly altering positive product perceptions. Attention to the warning is short-lived and does not significantly impact perceived healthful levels of consumption. Modeling purchase behavior using a random utility choice framework indicates that the inclusion of a warning in an advertisement of a can of tuna fish has no adverse affect on purchase behaviors for the population not at-risk and may, in certain cases, serve to decrease tuna purchase likelihood for "at-risk" respondents. Communicating advisory statements on healthy products, such as fish, creates a public health challenge; message pre-testing is imperative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-197
Number of pages13
JournalFood Policy
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

food policy
Nutrition Policy
subpopulation
purchase
Tuna
Fishes
food
tuna
fish
methylmercury compounds
Disclosure
methylmercury
cognitive development
health risk
consumer expenditure
Food
public health
Seafood
inclusion
seafood

Keywords

  • Consumer beliefs
  • Fish consumption
  • Methylmercury in fish
  • Warning disclosure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Fish : Friend or foe? Food policy and subpopulation warnings for consumers. / Hughner, Renee; Maher, Jill Kurp; Childs, Nancy M.; Nganje, William E.

In: Food Policy, Vol. 34, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 185-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hughner, Renee ; Maher, Jill Kurp ; Childs, Nancy M. ; Nganje, William E. / Fish : Friend or foe? Food policy and subpopulation warnings for consumers. In: Food Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 185-197.
@article{78db346be50f4f7ebb1c513b28e0f1e6,
title = "Fish: Friend or foe? Food policy and subpopulation warnings for consumers",
abstract = "Fish is a healthy food that provides valuable nutrients for heart health and cognitive development. However, for some subpopulations, consuming fish containing higher levels of methylmercury may pose a health risk. This research seeks to identify the impact of including a seafood warning disclosure in the advertisement of a can of tuna fish on consumers' purchasing behaviors. An experimental survey is employed to examine the resulting impact for two segments of the population - those considered at risk for methylmercury overexposure and all others. Findings indicate the use of warning disclosures increases respondents' negative product perceptions without significantly altering positive product perceptions. Attention to the warning is short-lived and does not significantly impact perceived healthful levels of consumption. Modeling purchase behavior using a random utility choice framework indicates that the inclusion of a warning in an advertisement of a can of tuna fish has no adverse affect on purchase behaviors for the population not at-risk and may, in certain cases, serve to decrease tuna purchase likelihood for {"}at-risk{"} respondents. Communicating advisory statements on healthy products, such as fish, creates a public health challenge; message pre-testing is imperative.",
keywords = "Consumer beliefs, Fish consumption, Methylmercury in fish, Warning disclosure",
author = "Renee Hughner and Maher, {Jill Kurp} and Childs, {Nancy M.} and Nganje, {William E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "185--197",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fish

T2 - Friend or foe? Food policy and subpopulation warnings for consumers

AU - Hughner, Renee

AU - Maher, Jill Kurp

AU - Childs, Nancy M.

AU - Nganje, William E.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Fish is a healthy food that provides valuable nutrients for heart health and cognitive development. However, for some subpopulations, consuming fish containing higher levels of methylmercury may pose a health risk. This research seeks to identify the impact of including a seafood warning disclosure in the advertisement of a can of tuna fish on consumers' purchasing behaviors. An experimental survey is employed to examine the resulting impact for two segments of the population - those considered at risk for methylmercury overexposure and all others. Findings indicate the use of warning disclosures increases respondents' negative product perceptions without significantly altering positive product perceptions. Attention to the warning is short-lived and does not significantly impact perceived healthful levels of consumption. Modeling purchase behavior using a random utility choice framework indicates that the inclusion of a warning in an advertisement of a can of tuna fish has no adverse affect on purchase behaviors for the population not at-risk and may, in certain cases, serve to decrease tuna purchase likelihood for "at-risk" respondents. Communicating advisory statements on healthy products, such as fish, creates a public health challenge; message pre-testing is imperative.

AB - Fish is a healthy food that provides valuable nutrients for heart health and cognitive development. However, for some subpopulations, consuming fish containing higher levels of methylmercury may pose a health risk. This research seeks to identify the impact of including a seafood warning disclosure in the advertisement of a can of tuna fish on consumers' purchasing behaviors. An experimental survey is employed to examine the resulting impact for two segments of the population - those considered at risk for methylmercury overexposure and all others. Findings indicate the use of warning disclosures increases respondents' negative product perceptions without significantly altering positive product perceptions. Attention to the warning is short-lived and does not significantly impact perceived healthful levels of consumption. Modeling purchase behavior using a random utility choice framework indicates that the inclusion of a warning in an advertisement of a can of tuna fish has no adverse affect on purchase behaviors for the population not at-risk and may, in certain cases, serve to decrease tuna purchase likelihood for "at-risk" respondents. Communicating advisory statements on healthy products, such as fish, creates a public health challenge; message pre-testing is imperative.

KW - Consumer beliefs

KW - Fish consumption

KW - Methylmercury in fish

KW - Warning disclosure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62749135487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62749135487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 185

EP - 197

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

IS - 2

ER -