Fish, finances, and feasibility: Concerns about tidal energy development in the United States

Stacia Dreyer, Ezra Beaver, Hilary J. Polis, Lekelia Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores stakeholder views on tidal energy in the state of Washington. Through compiling and analyzing three qualitative datasets, we take a triangulated approach to better understand stakeholders’ positive and negative views, concerns, and needs regarding tidal energy and if and how these are represented through print and online news sources. We analyzed comments submitted during the permitting process for the Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, comments included as part of a tidal energy mail survey sent to Washington residents, and media articles about tidal energy. We found four types of concern themes within negative views towards tidal energy: environmental, social, economic, and technical. Shared concerns between organized stakeholder groups and resident stakeholders about the project and tidal energy in general included concerns related to the harm to marine life, the loss of native fishing rights, expensiveness of development, increased electricity costs, and the engineering challenge of developing tidal energy. Concerns unique to stakeholder groups for the project included threats from scaling up, issues related to public safety and security, damage to cables, inability to stop the turbine, harm to terrestrial flora, and sediment disruption and contamination. Positive views were commonly associated with the need to address environmental issues, technological innovation and leadership, desire to have a diverse energy portfolio, and economic benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-136
Number of pages11
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Finance
Fish
finance
energy
Economics
stakeholder
Sediments
Cables
Contamination
Turbines
Electricity
Innovation
Costs
resident
mail survey
pilot project
technical innovation
environmental pollution
scaling
social economics

Keywords

  • Marine renewable energy
  • media analysis
  • Qualitative research
  • Stakeholder views
  • Tidal energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Fish, finances, and feasibility : Concerns about tidal energy development in the United States. / Dreyer, Stacia; Beaver, Ezra; Polis, Hilary J.; Jenkins, Lekelia.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 53, 01.07.2019, p. 126-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48ec814fde814afbb068b1c2d4bc9a7b,
title = "Fish, finances, and feasibility: Concerns about tidal energy development in the United States",
abstract = "This article explores stakeholder views on tidal energy in the state of Washington. Through compiling and analyzing three qualitative datasets, we take a triangulated approach to better understand stakeholders’ positive and negative views, concerns, and needs regarding tidal energy and if and how these are represented through print and online news sources. We analyzed comments submitted during the permitting process for the Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, comments included as part of a tidal energy mail survey sent to Washington residents, and media articles about tidal energy. We found four types of concern themes within negative views towards tidal energy: environmental, social, economic, and technical. Shared concerns between organized stakeholder groups and resident stakeholders about the project and tidal energy in general included concerns related to the harm to marine life, the loss of native fishing rights, expensiveness of development, increased electricity costs, and the engineering challenge of developing tidal energy. Concerns unique to stakeholder groups for the project included threats from scaling up, issues related to public safety and security, damage to cables, inability to stop the turbine, harm to terrestrial flora, and sediment disruption and contamination. Positive views were commonly associated with the need to address environmental issues, technological innovation and leadership, desire to have a diverse energy portfolio, and economic benefits.",
keywords = "Marine renewable energy, media analysis, Qualitative research, Stakeholder views, Tidal energy",
author = "Stacia Dreyer and Ezra Beaver and Polis, {Hilary J.} and Lekelia Jenkins",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "126--136",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fish, finances, and feasibility

T2 - Concerns about tidal energy development in the United States

AU - Dreyer, Stacia

AU - Beaver, Ezra

AU - Polis, Hilary J.

AU - Jenkins, Lekelia

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - This article explores stakeholder views on tidal energy in the state of Washington. Through compiling and analyzing three qualitative datasets, we take a triangulated approach to better understand stakeholders’ positive and negative views, concerns, and needs regarding tidal energy and if and how these are represented through print and online news sources. We analyzed comments submitted during the permitting process for the Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, comments included as part of a tidal energy mail survey sent to Washington residents, and media articles about tidal energy. We found four types of concern themes within negative views towards tidal energy: environmental, social, economic, and technical. Shared concerns between organized stakeholder groups and resident stakeholders about the project and tidal energy in general included concerns related to the harm to marine life, the loss of native fishing rights, expensiveness of development, increased electricity costs, and the engineering challenge of developing tidal energy. Concerns unique to stakeholder groups for the project included threats from scaling up, issues related to public safety and security, damage to cables, inability to stop the turbine, harm to terrestrial flora, and sediment disruption and contamination. Positive views were commonly associated with the need to address environmental issues, technological innovation and leadership, desire to have a diverse energy portfolio, and economic benefits.

AB - This article explores stakeholder views on tidal energy in the state of Washington. Through compiling and analyzing three qualitative datasets, we take a triangulated approach to better understand stakeholders’ positive and negative views, concerns, and needs regarding tidal energy and if and how these are represented through print and online news sources. We analyzed comments submitted during the permitting process for the Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, comments included as part of a tidal energy mail survey sent to Washington residents, and media articles about tidal energy. We found four types of concern themes within negative views towards tidal energy: environmental, social, economic, and technical. Shared concerns between organized stakeholder groups and resident stakeholders about the project and tidal energy in general included concerns related to the harm to marine life, the loss of native fishing rights, expensiveness of development, increased electricity costs, and the engineering challenge of developing tidal energy. Concerns unique to stakeholder groups for the project included threats from scaling up, issues related to public safety and security, damage to cables, inability to stop the turbine, harm to terrestrial flora, and sediment disruption and contamination. Positive views were commonly associated with the need to address environmental issues, technological innovation and leadership, desire to have a diverse energy portfolio, and economic benefits.

KW - Marine renewable energy

KW - media analysis

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Stakeholder views

KW - Tidal energy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062995074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062995074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.024

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062995074

VL - 53

SP - 126

EP - 136

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -