First language acquisition as a guide for theories of learning and pedagogy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article looks closely at the earliest periods of first language acquisition, and draws from this data explicit principles arguably applicable more generally to other sorts of learning, whether academic disciplines or complex skills. The principles are meant to be suggestive and to contribute to the development of a first language acquisition-based theory of learning. I argue that this theory constitutes the progressive aspect of efficacious pedagogies, but that a close look at first language acquisition also shows where progressive (immersion-like) pedagogies must be supplemented and transcended. In the end, what is needed is a theory of learning and pedagogy that is "post-progressive" in the sense of retaining the best elements of progressivism, while speaking directly to issues where first language acquisition is not a good guide for loter learning environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-354
Number of pages24
JournalLinguistics and Education
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

language acquisition
learning
progressivism
speaking
learning environment
Learning Theory
First Language Acquisition
Pedagogy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

First language acquisition as a guide for theories of learning and pedagogy. / Gee, James.

In: Linguistics and Education, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1994, p. 331-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68f5154d0c64428d83245d37599ea24a,
title = "First language acquisition as a guide for theories of learning and pedagogy",
abstract = "This article looks closely at the earliest periods of first language acquisition, and draws from this data explicit principles arguably applicable more generally to other sorts of learning, whether academic disciplines or complex skills. The principles are meant to be suggestive and to contribute to the development of a first language acquisition-based theory of learning. I argue that this theory constitutes the progressive aspect of efficacious pedagogies, but that a close look at first language acquisition also shows where progressive (immersion-like) pedagogies must be supplemented and transcended. In the end, what is needed is a theory of learning and pedagogy that is {"}post-progressive{"} in the sense of retaining the best elements of progressivism, while speaking directly to issues where first language acquisition is not a good guide for loter learning environments.",
author = "James Gee",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0898-5898(94)90002-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "331--354",
journal = "Linguistics and Education",
issn = "0898-5898",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - First language acquisition as a guide for theories of learning and pedagogy

AU - Gee, James

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - This article looks closely at the earliest periods of first language acquisition, and draws from this data explicit principles arguably applicable more generally to other sorts of learning, whether academic disciplines or complex skills. The principles are meant to be suggestive and to contribute to the development of a first language acquisition-based theory of learning. I argue that this theory constitutes the progressive aspect of efficacious pedagogies, but that a close look at first language acquisition also shows where progressive (immersion-like) pedagogies must be supplemented and transcended. In the end, what is needed is a theory of learning and pedagogy that is "post-progressive" in the sense of retaining the best elements of progressivism, while speaking directly to issues where first language acquisition is not a good guide for loter learning environments.

AB - This article looks closely at the earliest periods of first language acquisition, and draws from this data explicit principles arguably applicable more generally to other sorts of learning, whether academic disciplines or complex skills. The principles are meant to be suggestive and to contribute to the development of a first language acquisition-based theory of learning. I argue that this theory constitutes the progressive aspect of efficacious pedagogies, but that a close look at first language acquisition also shows where progressive (immersion-like) pedagogies must be supplemented and transcended. In the end, what is needed is a theory of learning and pedagogy that is "post-progressive" in the sense of retaining the best elements of progressivism, while speaking directly to issues where first language acquisition is not a good guide for loter learning environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038913264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038913264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0898-5898(94)90002-7

DO - 10.1016/0898-5898(94)90002-7

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 331

EP - 354

JO - Linguistics and Education

JF - Linguistics and Education

SN - 0898-5898

IS - 4

ER -