Finding Theory–Method Fit

A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building

Joel Gehman, Vern L. Glaser, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Denny Gioia, Ann Langley, Kevin Corley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article, together with a companion video, provides a synthesized summary of a Showcase Symposium held at the 2016 Academy of Management Annual Meeting in which prominent scholars—Denny Gioia, Kathy Eisenhardt, Ann Langley, and Kevin Corley—discussed different approaches to theory building with qualitative research. Our goal for the symposium was to increase management scholars’ sensitivity to the importance of theory–method “fit” in qualitative research. We have integrated the panelists’ prepared remarks and interactive discussion into three sections: an introduction by each scholar, who articulates her or his own approach to qualitative research; their personal reflections on the similarities and differences between approaches to qualitative research; and answers to general questions posed by the audience during the symposium. We conclude by summarizing insights gleaned from the symposium about important distinctions among these three qualitative research approaches and their appropriate usages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-300
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Qualitative research
Qualitative approaches
Theory building
Symposium
Integrated

Keywords

  • grounded theory
  • interviews
  • organization theory
  • qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Finding Theory–Method Fit : A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. / Gehman, Joel; Glaser, Vern L.; Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.; Gioia, Denny; Langley, Ann; Corley, Kevin.

In: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. 284-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gehman, Joel ; Glaser, Vern L. ; Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ; Gioia, Denny ; Langley, Ann ; Corley, Kevin. / Finding Theory–Method Fit : A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. In: Journal of Management Inquiry. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 284-300.
@article{f1b1a940a911490ea35534c70d99dcc0,
title = "Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building",
abstract = "This article, together with a companion video, provides a synthesized summary of a Showcase Symposium held at the 2016 Academy of Management Annual Meeting in which prominent scholars—Denny Gioia, Kathy Eisenhardt, Ann Langley, and Kevin Corley—discussed different approaches to theory building with qualitative research. Our goal for the symposium was to increase management scholars’ sensitivity to the importance of theory–method “fit” in qualitative research. We have integrated the panelists’ prepared remarks and interactive discussion into three sections: an introduction by each scholar, who articulates her or his own approach to qualitative research; their personal reflections on the similarities and differences between approaches to qualitative research; and answers to general questions posed by the audience during the symposium. We conclude by summarizing insights gleaned from the symposium about important distinctions among these three qualitative research approaches and their appropriate usages.",
keywords = "grounded theory, interviews, organization theory, qualitative research",
author = "Joel Gehman and Glaser, {Vern L.} and Eisenhardt, {Kathleen M.} and Denny Gioia and Ann Langley and Kevin Corley",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1056492617706029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "284--300",
journal = "Journal of Management Inquiry",
issn = "1056-4926",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finding Theory–Method Fit

T2 - A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building

AU - Gehman, Joel

AU - Glaser, Vern L.

AU - Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.

AU - Gioia, Denny

AU - Langley, Ann

AU - Corley, Kevin

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - This article, together with a companion video, provides a synthesized summary of a Showcase Symposium held at the 2016 Academy of Management Annual Meeting in which prominent scholars—Denny Gioia, Kathy Eisenhardt, Ann Langley, and Kevin Corley—discussed different approaches to theory building with qualitative research. Our goal for the symposium was to increase management scholars’ sensitivity to the importance of theory–method “fit” in qualitative research. We have integrated the panelists’ prepared remarks and interactive discussion into three sections: an introduction by each scholar, who articulates her or his own approach to qualitative research; their personal reflections on the similarities and differences between approaches to qualitative research; and answers to general questions posed by the audience during the symposium. We conclude by summarizing insights gleaned from the symposium about important distinctions among these three qualitative research approaches and their appropriate usages.

AB - This article, together with a companion video, provides a synthesized summary of a Showcase Symposium held at the 2016 Academy of Management Annual Meeting in which prominent scholars—Denny Gioia, Kathy Eisenhardt, Ann Langley, and Kevin Corley—discussed different approaches to theory building with qualitative research. Our goal for the symposium was to increase management scholars’ sensitivity to the importance of theory–method “fit” in qualitative research. We have integrated the panelists’ prepared remarks and interactive discussion into three sections: an introduction by each scholar, who articulates her or his own approach to qualitative research; their personal reflections on the similarities and differences between approaches to qualitative research; and answers to general questions posed by the audience during the symposium. We conclude by summarizing insights gleaned from the symposium about important distinctions among these three qualitative research approaches and their appropriate usages.

KW - grounded theory

KW - interviews

KW - organization theory

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048973669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048973669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1056492617706029

DO - 10.1177/1056492617706029

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 284

EP - 300

JO - Journal of Management Inquiry

JF - Journal of Management Inquiry

SN - 1056-4926

IS - 3

ER -