Finding common ground in the metropolis: Do planned residential enclaves connect or exclude?

Ann Forsyth, Katherine Crewe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Do planned residential enclaves of like-minded people undermine metropolitan diversity and regional planning, or do they provide a supportive base of services and assistance for specific population groups? In this paper, we propose a classification of enclaves related to level of planning, resident choice, income mix, and the ways in which the enclaves are formed (i.e., physical barriers, regulations, clustering). Three planned enclaves represent pioneering examples of what became important types of environments in the U.S.: one of the first large-scale retirement communities, an alternative residential college, and an ecologically oriented neighborhood. All three were initiated in the 1960s through the 1970s in low-density environments. We find that, compared with naturally occurring enclaves, such places have more formal regulation of residents, but their implications for urban diversity and cooperation are less clear than the high- and low-income exclusionary areas, gated and otherwise, that have been the subject of so much criticism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-75
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Architectural and Planning Research
Volume28
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Regional planning
enclave
metropolis
resident
income
regulation
Planning
population group
regional planning
retirement
low income
criticism
assistance
planning
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Urban Studies
  • Architecture
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Finding common ground in the metropolis : Do planned residential enclaves connect or exclude? / Forsyth, Ann; Crewe, Katherine.

In: Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 58-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b4074fd552246a2b1b554c76b5f5915,
title = "Finding common ground in the metropolis: Do planned residential enclaves connect or exclude?",
abstract = "Do planned residential enclaves of like-minded people undermine metropolitan diversity and regional planning, or do they provide a supportive base of services and assistance for specific population groups? In this paper, we propose a classification of enclaves related to level of planning, resident choice, income mix, and the ways in which the enclaves are formed (i.e., physical barriers, regulations, clustering). Three planned enclaves represent pioneering examples of what became important types of environments in the U.S.: one of the first large-scale retirement communities, an alternative residential college, and an ecologically oriented neighborhood. All three were initiated in the 1960s through the 1970s in low-density environments. We find that, compared with naturally occurring enclaves, such places have more formal regulation of residents, but their implications for urban diversity and cooperation are less clear than the high- and low-income exclusionary areas, gated and otherwise, that have been the subject of so much criticism.",
author = "Ann Forsyth and Katherine Crewe",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "58--75",
journal = "Journal of Architectural and Planning Research",
issn = "0738-0895",
publisher = "Locke Science Publishing Company Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finding common ground in the metropolis

T2 - Do planned residential enclaves connect or exclude?

AU - Forsyth, Ann

AU - Crewe, Katherine

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Do planned residential enclaves of like-minded people undermine metropolitan diversity and regional planning, or do they provide a supportive base of services and assistance for specific population groups? In this paper, we propose a classification of enclaves related to level of planning, resident choice, income mix, and the ways in which the enclaves are formed (i.e., physical barriers, regulations, clustering). Three planned enclaves represent pioneering examples of what became important types of environments in the U.S.: one of the first large-scale retirement communities, an alternative residential college, and an ecologically oriented neighborhood. All three were initiated in the 1960s through the 1970s in low-density environments. We find that, compared with naturally occurring enclaves, such places have more formal regulation of residents, but their implications for urban diversity and cooperation are less clear than the high- and low-income exclusionary areas, gated and otherwise, that have been the subject of so much criticism.

AB - Do planned residential enclaves of like-minded people undermine metropolitan diversity and regional planning, or do they provide a supportive base of services and assistance for specific population groups? In this paper, we propose a classification of enclaves related to level of planning, resident choice, income mix, and the ways in which the enclaves are formed (i.e., physical barriers, regulations, clustering). Three planned enclaves represent pioneering examples of what became important types of environments in the U.S.: one of the first large-scale retirement communities, an alternative residential college, and an ecologically oriented neighborhood. All three were initiated in the 1960s through the 1970s in low-density environments. We find that, compared with naturally occurring enclaves, such places have more formal regulation of residents, but their implications for urban diversity and cooperation are less clear than the high- and low-income exclusionary areas, gated and otherwise, that have been the subject of so much criticism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051707027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051707027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80051707027

VL - 28

SP - 58

EP - 75

JO - Journal of Architectural and Planning Research

JF - Journal of Architectural and Planning Research

SN - 0738-0895

IS - 1

ER -