Finding a Place for Networks in Archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Formal network analyses have a long history in archaeology but have recently seen a rapid florescence. Network models drawing on approaches from graph theory, social network analysis, and complexity science have been used to address a broad array of questions about the relationships among network structure, positions, and the attributes and outcomes for individuals and larger groups at a range of social scales. Current archaeological network research is both methodologically and theoretically diverse, but there are still many daunting challenges ahead for the formal exploration of social networks using archaeological data. If we can face these challenges, archaeologists are well positioned to contribute to long-standing debates in the broader sphere of network research on the nature of network theory, the relationships between networks and culture, and dynamics of social networks over the long term.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Archaeological Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

archaeology
social network
graph theory
network analysis
Archaeology
history
science
Social Networks
Group

Keywords

  • Agent-based modeling
  • Complex networks
  • Complexity science
  • GIS
  • Graph theory
  • Material culture
  • Relational sociology
  • Social network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology
  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Finding a Place for Networks in Archaeology. / Peeples, Matthew.

In: Journal of Archaeological Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e425f64b01c14454af03f7f1e77afa2e,
title = "Finding a Place for Networks in Archaeology",
abstract = "Formal network analyses have a long history in archaeology but have recently seen a rapid florescence. Network models drawing on approaches from graph theory, social network analysis, and complexity science have been used to address a broad array of questions about the relationships among network structure, positions, and the attributes and outcomes for individuals and larger groups at a range of social scales. Current archaeological network research is both methodologically and theoretically diverse, but there are still many daunting challenges ahead for the formal exploration of social networks using archaeological data. If we can face these challenges, archaeologists are well positioned to contribute to long-standing debates in the broader sphere of network research on the nature of network theory, the relationships between networks and culture, and dynamics of social networks over the long term.",
keywords = "Agent-based modeling, Complex networks, Complexity science, GIS, Graph theory, Material culture, Relational sociology, Social network analysis",
author = "Matthew Peeples",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10814-019-09127-8",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Research",
issn = "1059-0161",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finding a Place for Networks in Archaeology

AU - Peeples, Matthew

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Formal network analyses have a long history in archaeology but have recently seen a rapid florescence. Network models drawing on approaches from graph theory, social network analysis, and complexity science have been used to address a broad array of questions about the relationships among network structure, positions, and the attributes and outcomes for individuals and larger groups at a range of social scales. Current archaeological network research is both methodologically and theoretically diverse, but there are still many daunting challenges ahead for the formal exploration of social networks using archaeological data. If we can face these challenges, archaeologists are well positioned to contribute to long-standing debates in the broader sphere of network research on the nature of network theory, the relationships between networks and culture, and dynamics of social networks over the long term.

AB - Formal network analyses have a long history in archaeology but have recently seen a rapid florescence. Network models drawing on approaches from graph theory, social network analysis, and complexity science have been used to address a broad array of questions about the relationships among network structure, positions, and the attributes and outcomes for individuals and larger groups at a range of social scales. Current archaeological network research is both methodologically and theoretically diverse, but there are still many daunting challenges ahead for the formal exploration of social networks using archaeological data. If we can face these challenges, archaeologists are well positioned to contribute to long-standing debates in the broader sphere of network research on the nature of network theory, the relationships between networks and culture, and dynamics of social networks over the long term.

KW - Agent-based modeling

KW - Complex networks

KW - Complexity science

KW - GIS

KW - Graph theory

KW - Material culture

KW - Relational sociology

KW - Social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061208675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061208675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10814-019-09127-8

DO - 10.1007/s10814-019-09127-8

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Archaeological Research

JF - Journal of Archaeological Research

SN - 1059-0161

ER -