Fighting over a red herring: The role of economics in recreational-commercial allocation disputes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article turns a critical eye on the current role of economics in informing inter-sector allocation disputes. I argue that much of this analysis relies on a notion of efficiency that is flawed on both static and dynamic grounds and fails to address the inefficiencies of existing management institutions. I propose that reallocation is rarely a first-order concern. Rather, it is a "red herring" that detracts from far more necessary fundamental reforms within the recreational sector. These reforms would significantly improve the accountability and efficiency of the sector and establish the necessary institutions to resolve allocation disputes in an adaptive, efficient manner through arms-length transactions. I propose a general framework for reform of mixed recreational-commercial fisheries and discuss realistic rights-based policies to better manage fishing mortality for private recreational anglers and facilitate transferability across sectors. I close with an appeal for more policy-relevant work on recreational fisheries by fisheries economists.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-20
    Number of pages20
    JournalMarine Resource Economics
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    fighting
    fishery
    reform
    fishing mortality
    accountability
    economics
    efficiency
    economist
    transaction
    appeal
    mortality
    responsibility
    management
    allocation
    policy
    Economics
    Dispute
    analysis
    rights
    commercial fishery

    Keywords

    • Allocation
    • Allocative efficiency
    • Equimarginal principle
    • Recreational fisheries

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
    • Oceanography
    • Geography, Planning and Development

    Cite this

    Fighting over a red herring : The role of economics in recreational-commercial allocation disputes. / Abbott, Joshua.

    In: Marine Resource Economics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 1-20.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{ae202b2e801e4d4bb6ecfe81a372ea18,
    title = "Fighting over a red herring: The role of economics in recreational-commercial allocation disputes",
    abstract = "This article turns a critical eye on the current role of economics in informing inter-sector allocation disputes. I argue that much of this analysis relies on a notion of efficiency that is flawed on both static and dynamic grounds and fails to address the inefficiencies of existing management institutions. I propose that reallocation is rarely a first-order concern. Rather, it is a {"}red herring{"} that detracts from far more necessary fundamental reforms within the recreational sector. These reforms would significantly improve the accountability and efficiency of the sector and establish the necessary institutions to resolve allocation disputes in an adaptive, efficient manner through arms-length transactions. I propose a general framework for reform of mixed recreational-commercial fisheries and discuss realistic rights-based policies to better manage fishing mortality for private recreational anglers and facilitate transferability across sectors. I close with an appeal for more policy-relevant work on recreational fisheries by fisheries economists.",
    keywords = "Allocation, Allocative efficiency, Equimarginal principle, Recreational fisheries",
    author = "Joshua Abbott",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1086/679464",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "1--20",
    journal = "Marine Resource Economics",
    issn = "0738-1360",
    publisher = "The MRE Foundation",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Fighting over a red herring

    T2 - The role of economics in recreational-commercial allocation disputes

    AU - Abbott, Joshua

    PY - 2015/1/1

    Y1 - 2015/1/1

    N2 - This article turns a critical eye on the current role of economics in informing inter-sector allocation disputes. I argue that much of this analysis relies on a notion of efficiency that is flawed on both static and dynamic grounds and fails to address the inefficiencies of existing management institutions. I propose that reallocation is rarely a first-order concern. Rather, it is a "red herring" that detracts from far more necessary fundamental reforms within the recreational sector. These reforms would significantly improve the accountability and efficiency of the sector and establish the necessary institutions to resolve allocation disputes in an adaptive, efficient manner through arms-length transactions. I propose a general framework for reform of mixed recreational-commercial fisheries and discuss realistic rights-based policies to better manage fishing mortality for private recreational anglers and facilitate transferability across sectors. I close with an appeal for more policy-relevant work on recreational fisheries by fisheries economists.

    AB - This article turns a critical eye on the current role of economics in informing inter-sector allocation disputes. I argue that much of this analysis relies on a notion of efficiency that is flawed on both static and dynamic grounds and fails to address the inefficiencies of existing management institutions. I propose that reallocation is rarely a first-order concern. Rather, it is a "red herring" that detracts from far more necessary fundamental reforms within the recreational sector. These reforms would significantly improve the accountability and efficiency of the sector and establish the necessary institutions to resolve allocation disputes in an adaptive, efficient manner through arms-length transactions. I propose a general framework for reform of mixed recreational-commercial fisheries and discuss realistic rights-based policies to better manage fishing mortality for private recreational anglers and facilitate transferability across sectors. I close with an appeal for more policy-relevant work on recreational fisheries by fisheries economists.

    KW - Allocation

    KW - Allocative efficiency

    KW - Equimarginal principle

    KW - Recreational fisheries

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929091793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929091793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/679464

    DO - 10.1086/679464

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84929091793

    VL - 30

    SP - 1

    EP - 20

    JO - Marine Resource Economics

    JF - Marine Resource Economics

    SN - 0738-1360

    IS - 1

    ER -