Federally sponsored multidisciplinary research centers: Learning, evaluation, and vicious circles

Jan Youtie, Elizabeth Corley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Despite the increasing investment in multi-year federally funded science and technology centers in universities, there are few studies of how these centers engage in learning and change based on information submitted from various agents in the oversight and evaluation process. One challenge is how to manage and respond to this evaluative information, especially when it is conflicting. Although the center can learn and adapt in response to this information, it can also become subject to a vicious circle of continuous restructuring and production of documentation to address various and potentially inconsistent recommendations. In this paper we illustrate the effects of such a dynamic based on our experiences as external evaluators of the $25 million NSF-funded Learning in Informal and Formal Environments (LIFE) Center. The case study presents an analysis of annual reports and strategic planning documents along with other sources of evidence to illustrate the evolution of center organizational approaches in response to evaluations by external review panels, center evaluators, program managers, and other external stakeholders. We conclude with suggestions for how evaluators may help centers ease the cost of learning and reduce the likelihood of a vicious circle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-20
Number of pages8
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2011


  • Management
  • Research center

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Federally sponsored multidisciplinary research centers: Learning, evaluation, and vicious circles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this