Federal sentencing as a complex collaborative process

Judges, prosecutors, judge-prosecutor dyads, and disparity in sentencing

Byungbae Kim, Cassia Spohn, E. C. Hedberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investigations of how criminal justice actors contribute to variation in sentencing typically focus on the role played by the judge. We argue that sentencing should be viewed as a collaborative process involving actors other than the judge and that the role of the prosecutor is particularly salient. We also contend that the courtroom workgroup literature has suggested that sentences may vary depending on the particular judge and prosecutor to whom the case is assigned. By using a unique data set from three U.S. district courts (N = 2,686) that identifies both the judge and the prosecutor handling the case, we examine how the judge, the prosecutor, and the judge-prosecutor dyad contribute to variance in offender sentences. We do this by employing cross-classified random-effects models to estimate the variance components associated with judges, prosecutors, and judge-prosecutor interactions. The results indicate that disparity attributable to the prosecutor is larger than disparity from the judge. Moreover, the role that the judge plays is moderated by the prosecutor to whom the case is assigned, as the judge-prosecutor effect is consistently larger than other random effects across the models. We also find that results vary by judicial district.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-623
Number of pages27
JournalCriminology
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Criminal Law
dyad
Datasets
district court
offender
justice
district

Keywords

  • Disparity
  • Judges
  • Prosecutors
  • Sentencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Federal sentencing as a complex collaborative process : Judges, prosecutors, judge-prosecutor dyads, and disparity in sentencing. / Kim, Byungbae; Spohn, Cassia; Hedberg, E. C.

In: Criminology, Vol. 53, No. 4, 01.11.2015, p. 597-623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17127fbc177f4414a8b41bf0aee2b50d,
title = "Federal sentencing as a complex collaborative process: Judges, prosecutors, judge-prosecutor dyads, and disparity in sentencing",
abstract = "Investigations of how criminal justice actors contribute to variation in sentencing typically focus on the role played by the judge. We argue that sentencing should be viewed as a collaborative process involving actors other than the judge and that the role of the prosecutor is particularly salient. We also contend that the courtroom workgroup literature has suggested that sentences may vary depending on the particular judge and prosecutor to whom the case is assigned. By using a unique data set from three U.S. district courts (N = 2,686) that identifies both the judge and the prosecutor handling the case, we examine how the judge, the prosecutor, and the judge-prosecutor dyad contribute to variance in offender sentences. We do this by employing cross-classified random-effects models to estimate the variance components associated with judges, prosecutors, and judge-prosecutor interactions. The results indicate that disparity attributable to the prosecutor is larger than disparity from the judge. Moreover, the role that the judge plays is moderated by the prosecutor to whom the case is assigned, as the judge-prosecutor effect is consistently larger than other random effects across the models. We also find that results vary by judicial district.",
keywords = "Disparity, Judges, Prosecutors, Sentencing",
author = "Byungbae Kim and Cassia Spohn and Hedberg, {E. C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9125.12090",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "597--623",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Federal sentencing as a complex collaborative process

T2 - Judges, prosecutors, judge-prosecutor dyads, and disparity in sentencing

AU - Kim, Byungbae

AU - Spohn, Cassia

AU - Hedberg, E. C.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Investigations of how criminal justice actors contribute to variation in sentencing typically focus on the role played by the judge. We argue that sentencing should be viewed as a collaborative process involving actors other than the judge and that the role of the prosecutor is particularly salient. We also contend that the courtroom workgroup literature has suggested that sentences may vary depending on the particular judge and prosecutor to whom the case is assigned. By using a unique data set from three U.S. district courts (N = 2,686) that identifies both the judge and the prosecutor handling the case, we examine how the judge, the prosecutor, and the judge-prosecutor dyad contribute to variance in offender sentences. We do this by employing cross-classified random-effects models to estimate the variance components associated with judges, prosecutors, and judge-prosecutor interactions. The results indicate that disparity attributable to the prosecutor is larger than disparity from the judge. Moreover, the role that the judge plays is moderated by the prosecutor to whom the case is assigned, as the judge-prosecutor effect is consistently larger than other random effects across the models. We also find that results vary by judicial district.

AB - Investigations of how criminal justice actors contribute to variation in sentencing typically focus on the role played by the judge. We argue that sentencing should be viewed as a collaborative process involving actors other than the judge and that the role of the prosecutor is particularly salient. We also contend that the courtroom workgroup literature has suggested that sentences may vary depending on the particular judge and prosecutor to whom the case is assigned. By using a unique data set from three U.S. district courts (N = 2,686) that identifies both the judge and the prosecutor handling the case, we examine how the judge, the prosecutor, and the judge-prosecutor dyad contribute to variance in offender sentences. We do this by employing cross-classified random-effects models to estimate the variance components associated with judges, prosecutors, and judge-prosecutor interactions. The results indicate that disparity attributable to the prosecutor is larger than disparity from the judge. Moreover, the role that the judge plays is moderated by the prosecutor to whom the case is assigned, as the judge-prosecutor effect is consistently larger than other random effects across the models. We also find that results vary by judicial district.

KW - Disparity

KW - Judges

KW - Prosecutors

KW - Sentencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955212908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955212908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9125.12090

DO - 10.1111/1745-9125.12090

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 597

EP - 623

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 4

ER -