Federal-Local coordination in homeland security

Edward Maguire, William R. King

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Any legislative change which would render … local and state law enforcement subservient to federal jurisdiction, would, in my opinion, be disastrous. – J. Edgar Hoover 1954 [A]gencies at different levels of government will, as a generality, have different organizational cultures that are not ideally suited to the development of effective countermeasures against the crime and related problems each agency targets. – William Geller and Norval Morris 1992 INTRODUCTION Lack of coordination and cooperation between law enforcement officials at all levels of government has received prominent attention since the terrorist attacks on United States soil on September 11, 2001. The contentious relationship between the FBI and local police is depicted regularly in television and film; it is one of the stock Hollywood clichés in police and crime dramas. Local police have complained for many years about being patronized, alienated, upstaged, or simply ignored by FBI agents (Geller and Morris 1992). Whereas the relationship between the FBI and state and local police is the most obvious and visible issue in federal-local coordination for homeland security, the more general concern is how the federal government’s entire alphabet soup of agencies can work cooperatively with local governments to secure the homeland. Concerns about terrorism have brought these issues to the forefront, with news reports, professional associations, think tanks, and government commissions all coming to similar conclusions: The linkages between federal and local agencies need significant improvement if we are to prevent terrorist incidents on American soil and enhance homeland security.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCriminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages322-356
Number of pages35
ISBN (Electronic)9780511976384
ISBN (Print)9780521899451
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Homelands
police
law enforcement
offense
local law
news report
think tank
September 11, 2001
state law
professional association
organizational culture
drama
Federal Government
jurisdiction
television
terrorism
incident
lack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Maguire, E., & King, W. R. (2011). Federal-Local coordination in homeland security. In Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security (pp. 322-356). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976384.015

Federal-Local coordination in homeland security. / Maguire, Edward; King, William R.

Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 322-356.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Maguire, E & King, WR 2011, Federal-Local coordination in homeland security. in Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Cambridge University Press, pp. 322-356. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976384.015
Maguire E, King WR. Federal-Local coordination in homeland security. In Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 322-356 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976384.015
Maguire, Edward ; King, William R. / Federal-Local coordination in homeland security. Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 322-356
@inbook{4b8b75a614d24ea0be4bd9ca1c1ee398,
title = "Federal-Local coordination in homeland security",
abstract = "Any legislative change which would render … local and state law enforcement subservient to federal jurisdiction, would, in my opinion, be disastrous. – J. Edgar Hoover 1954 [A]gencies at different levels of government will, as a generality, have different organizational cultures that are not ideally suited to the development of effective countermeasures against the crime and related problems each agency targets. – William Geller and Norval Morris 1992 INTRODUCTION Lack of coordination and cooperation between law enforcement officials at all levels of government has received prominent attention since the terrorist attacks on United States soil on September 11, 2001. The contentious relationship between the FBI and local police is depicted regularly in television and film; it is one of the stock Hollywood clich{\'e}s in police and crime dramas. Local police have complained for many years about being patronized, alienated, upstaged, or simply ignored by FBI agents (Geller and Morris 1992). Whereas the relationship between the FBI and state and local police is the most obvious and visible issue in federal-local coordination for homeland security, the more general concern is how the federal government’s entire alphabet soup of agencies can work cooperatively with local governments to secure the homeland. Concerns about terrorism have brought these issues to the forefront, with news reports, professional associations, think tanks, and government commissions all coming to similar conclusions: The linkages between federal and local agencies need significant improvement if we are to prevent terrorist incidents on American soil and enhance homeland security.",
author = "Edward Maguire and King, {William R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511976384.015",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521899451",
pages = "322--356",
booktitle = "Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Federal-Local coordination in homeland security

AU - Maguire, Edward

AU - King, William R.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Any legislative change which would render … local and state law enforcement subservient to federal jurisdiction, would, in my opinion, be disastrous. – J. Edgar Hoover 1954 [A]gencies at different levels of government will, as a generality, have different organizational cultures that are not ideally suited to the development of effective countermeasures against the crime and related problems each agency targets. – William Geller and Norval Morris 1992 INTRODUCTION Lack of coordination and cooperation between law enforcement officials at all levels of government has received prominent attention since the terrorist attacks on United States soil on September 11, 2001. The contentious relationship between the FBI and local police is depicted regularly in television and film; it is one of the stock Hollywood clichés in police and crime dramas. Local police have complained for many years about being patronized, alienated, upstaged, or simply ignored by FBI agents (Geller and Morris 1992). Whereas the relationship between the FBI and state and local police is the most obvious and visible issue in federal-local coordination for homeland security, the more general concern is how the federal government’s entire alphabet soup of agencies can work cooperatively with local governments to secure the homeland. Concerns about terrorism have brought these issues to the forefront, with news reports, professional associations, think tanks, and government commissions all coming to similar conclusions: The linkages between federal and local agencies need significant improvement if we are to prevent terrorist incidents on American soil and enhance homeland security.

AB - Any legislative change which would render … local and state law enforcement subservient to federal jurisdiction, would, in my opinion, be disastrous. – J. Edgar Hoover 1954 [A]gencies at different levels of government will, as a generality, have different organizational cultures that are not ideally suited to the development of effective countermeasures against the crime and related problems each agency targets. – William Geller and Norval Morris 1992 INTRODUCTION Lack of coordination and cooperation between law enforcement officials at all levels of government has received prominent attention since the terrorist attacks on United States soil on September 11, 2001. The contentious relationship between the FBI and local police is depicted regularly in television and film; it is one of the stock Hollywood clichés in police and crime dramas. Local police have complained for many years about being patronized, alienated, upstaged, or simply ignored by FBI agents (Geller and Morris 1992). Whereas the relationship between the FBI and state and local police is the most obvious and visible issue in federal-local coordination for homeland security, the more general concern is how the federal government’s entire alphabet soup of agencies can work cooperatively with local governments to secure the homeland. Concerns about terrorism have brought these issues to the forefront, with news reports, professional associations, think tanks, and government commissions all coming to similar conclusions: The linkages between federal and local agencies need significant improvement if we are to prevent terrorist incidents on American soil and enhance homeland security.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857965825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857965825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511976384.015

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511976384.015

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521899451

SP - 322

EP - 356

BT - Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -