Abstract

We evaluated the feasibility of using waste activated sludge (WAS) from a wastewater treatment plant as an internal electron donor to fuel denitrification, by increasing its bioavailability with Focused-Pulsed (FP) technology. The focused-pulsed treatment of WAS (producing FP-WAS) increased the semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand (SSCOD) by 26 times compared with the control WAS. The maximum denitrification rate of FP-WAS (0.25 g nitrate-nitrogen [NO3 --N]/g volatile suspended solids [VSS]·d) was greater than for untreated WAS (0.05 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) and methanol (0.15 NO3 --N/g VSS·d). Centrifuging out the larger suspended solids created FP-centrate, which had a rate (0.14 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) comparable with that of methanol. Thus, FP treatment of WAS created SSCOD, which was an internal electron donor that was able to drive denitrification at a rate similar to or greater than methanol. One trade-off of using FP-WAS for denitrification is an increase in total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) loading. While FP-WAS achieved the lowest total nitrogen and NO3 --N concentrations in the batch denitrification test, its final ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was the highest, as a result of the release of organic nitrogen from the FP-treated biomass; FP-centrate had less release of total soluble nitrogen. While the return of total nitrogen (TN) is small compared with the SSCOD, the effects of the added nitrogen loading need to be considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2316-2324
Number of pages9
JournalWater Environment Research
Volume82
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Denitrification
activated sludge
denitrification
Nitrogen
electron
Electrons
nitrogen
Chemical oxygen demand
chemical oxygen demand
Methanol
methanol
organic nitrogen
Ammonia
Wastewater treatment
Nitrates
trade-off
bioavailability
Biomass
ammonia
nitrate

Keywords

  • Denitrification
  • Focused-pulsed
  • Semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand
  • Supplemental electron donor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Feasibility of focused-pulsed treated waste activated sludge as a supplemental electron donor for denitrification. / Lee, Il Su; Parameswaran, Prathap; Alder, Jared M.; Rittmann, Bruce.

In: Water Environment Research, Vol. 82, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 2316-2324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d54cb7169974e8a8ad9fd2bc2e9a2a9,
title = "Feasibility of focused-pulsed treated waste activated sludge as a supplemental electron donor for denitrification",
abstract = "We evaluated the feasibility of using waste activated sludge (WAS) from a wastewater treatment plant as an internal electron donor to fuel denitrification, by increasing its bioavailability with Focused-Pulsed (FP) technology. The focused-pulsed treatment of WAS (producing FP-WAS) increased the semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand (SSCOD) by 26 times compared with the control WAS. The maximum denitrification rate of FP-WAS (0.25 g nitrate-nitrogen [NO3 --N]/g volatile suspended solids [VSS]·d) was greater than for untreated WAS (0.05 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) and methanol (0.15 NO3 --N/g VSS·d). Centrifuging out the larger suspended solids created FP-centrate, which had a rate (0.14 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) comparable with that of methanol. Thus, FP treatment of WAS created SSCOD, which was an internal electron donor that was able to drive denitrification at a rate similar to or greater than methanol. One trade-off of using FP-WAS for denitrification is an increase in total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) loading. While FP-WAS achieved the lowest total nitrogen and NO3 --N concentrations in the batch denitrification test, its final ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was the highest, as a result of the release of organic nitrogen from the FP-treated biomass; FP-centrate had less release of total soluble nitrogen. While the return of total nitrogen (TN) is small compared with the SSCOD, the effects of the added nitrogen loading need to be considered.",
keywords = "Denitrification, Focused-pulsed, Semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand, Supplemental electron donor",
author = "Lee, {Il Su} and Prathap Parameswaran and Alder, {Jared M.} and Bruce Rittmann",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.2175/106143010X12609736967288",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "2316--2324",
journal = "Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation",
issn = "1061-4303",
publisher = "Water Environment Federation",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of focused-pulsed treated waste activated sludge as a supplemental electron donor for denitrification

AU - Lee, Il Su

AU - Parameswaran, Prathap

AU - Alder, Jared M.

AU - Rittmann, Bruce

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - We evaluated the feasibility of using waste activated sludge (WAS) from a wastewater treatment plant as an internal electron donor to fuel denitrification, by increasing its bioavailability with Focused-Pulsed (FP) technology. The focused-pulsed treatment of WAS (producing FP-WAS) increased the semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand (SSCOD) by 26 times compared with the control WAS. The maximum denitrification rate of FP-WAS (0.25 g nitrate-nitrogen [NO3 --N]/g volatile suspended solids [VSS]·d) was greater than for untreated WAS (0.05 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) and methanol (0.15 NO3 --N/g VSS·d). Centrifuging out the larger suspended solids created FP-centrate, which had a rate (0.14 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) comparable with that of methanol. Thus, FP treatment of WAS created SSCOD, which was an internal electron donor that was able to drive denitrification at a rate similar to or greater than methanol. One trade-off of using FP-WAS for denitrification is an increase in total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) loading. While FP-WAS achieved the lowest total nitrogen and NO3 --N concentrations in the batch denitrification test, its final ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was the highest, as a result of the release of organic nitrogen from the FP-treated biomass; FP-centrate had less release of total soluble nitrogen. While the return of total nitrogen (TN) is small compared with the SSCOD, the effects of the added nitrogen loading need to be considered.

AB - We evaluated the feasibility of using waste activated sludge (WAS) from a wastewater treatment plant as an internal electron donor to fuel denitrification, by increasing its bioavailability with Focused-Pulsed (FP) technology. The focused-pulsed treatment of WAS (producing FP-WAS) increased the semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand (SSCOD) by 26 times compared with the control WAS. The maximum denitrification rate of FP-WAS (0.25 g nitrate-nitrogen [NO3 --N]/g volatile suspended solids [VSS]·d) was greater than for untreated WAS (0.05 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) and methanol (0.15 NO3 --N/g VSS·d). Centrifuging out the larger suspended solids created FP-centrate, which had a rate (0.14 g NO3 --N/g VSS·d) comparable with that of methanol. Thus, FP treatment of WAS created SSCOD, which was an internal electron donor that was able to drive denitrification at a rate similar to or greater than methanol. One trade-off of using FP-WAS for denitrification is an increase in total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) loading. While FP-WAS achieved the lowest total nitrogen and NO3 --N concentrations in the batch denitrification test, its final ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was the highest, as a result of the release of organic nitrogen from the FP-treated biomass; FP-centrate had less release of total soluble nitrogen. While the return of total nitrogen (TN) is small compared with the SSCOD, the effects of the added nitrogen loading need to be considered.

KW - Denitrification

KW - Focused-pulsed

KW - Semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand

KW - Supplemental electron donor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952274104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952274104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2175/106143010X12609736967288

DO - 10.2175/106143010X12609736967288

M3 - Article

C2 - 21214025

AN - SCOPUS:79952274104

VL - 82

SP - 2316

EP - 2324

JO - Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation

JF - Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation

SN - 1061-4303

IS - 12

ER -