Fate of the verde: Water, environmental conflict, and the politics of scale in Arizona's central highlands

Robert Bolin, Timothy Collins, Kate Darby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper engages recent discussions about the politics of scale to examine emerging place-based conflicts over water resources in Arizona. Our focus is on the 14,247 sq km Verde River watershed in Arizona's Central Highlands, a region that contains the Prescott Active Management Area (PrAMA), one of five zones in the state in which groundwater is regulated by state law. Residents in the watershed depend almost exclusively on groundwater, a resource now being mined at rates in excess of recharge. A host of environmental issues - including threats to local water security and to the baseflow of one of the few remaining perennial streams in Arizona - have catalyzed a variety of civil society groups across the region in seeking to stop, control, or mitigate scaled impacts of rapid exurbanization and groundwater exploitation in the PrAMA. Based on in-depth interviews, public fora transcripts, government and civil society group documents, media accounts, and scientific reports, we examine competing discourses about water and scalar politics of key citizen groups, government actors, and development interests. Through this analysis, we examine the socio-spatial construction of claims and counter-claims of environmental harms of groundwater development. The paper contributes to recent discussions of scalar politics in geography by highlighting the importance of environmental governance disputes over water resources using a First World case study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1494-1511
Number of pages18
JournalGeoforum
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

water
politics
civil society
resources
Group
state law
Western world
management
exploitation
river
threat
resident
governance
geography
citizen
discourse
interview

Keywords

  • Arizona
  • Environmental conflict
  • Groundwater
  • Political ecology
  • Politics of scale
  • Spatial fix

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Fate of the verde : Water, environmental conflict, and the politics of scale in Arizona's central highlands. / Bolin, Robert; Collins, Timothy; Darby, Kate.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 39, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 1494-1511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bolin, Robert ; Collins, Timothy ; Darby, Kate. / Fate of the verde : Water, environmental conflict, and the politics of scale in Arizona's central highlands. In: Geoforum. 2008 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 1494-1511.
@article{e586e3f24f3948f085ef25c366509a8f,
title = "Fate of the verde: Water, environmental conflict, and the politics of scale in Arizona's central highlands",
abstract = "This paper engages recent discussions about the politics of scale to examine emerging place-based conflicts over water resources in Arizona. Our focus is on the 14,247 sq km Verde River watershed in Arizona's Central Highlands, a region that contains the Prescott Active Management Area (PrAMA), one of five zones in the state in which groundwater is regulated by state law. Residents in the watershed depend almost exclusively on groundwater, a resource now being mined at rates in excess of recharge. A host of environmental issues - including threats to local water security and to the baseflow of one of the few remaining perennial streams in Arizona - have catalyzed a variety of civil society groups across the region in seeking to stop, control, or mitigate scaled impacts of rapid exurbanization and groundwater exploitation in the PrAMA. Based on in-depth interviews, public fora transcripts, government and civil society group documents, media accounts, and scientific reports, we examine competing discourses about water and scalar politics of key citizen groups, government actors, and development interests. Through this analysis, we examine the socio-spatial construction of claims and counter-claims of environmental harms of groundwater development. The paper contributes to recent discussions of scalar politics in geography by highlighting the importance of environmental governance disputes over water resources using a First World case study.",
keywords = "Arizona, Environmental conflict, Groundwater, Political ecology, Politics of scale, Spatial fix",
author = "Robert Bolin and Timothy Collins and Kate Darby",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1494--1511",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fate of the verde

T2 - Water, environmental conflict, and the politics of scale in Arizona's central highlands

AU - Bolin, Robert

AU - Collins, Timothy

AU - Darby, Kate

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - This paper engages recent discussions about the politics of scale to examine emerging place-based conflicts over water resources in Arizona. Our focus is on the 14,247 sq km Verde River watershed in Arizona's Central Highlands, a region that contains the Prescott Active Management Area (PrAMA), one of five zones in the state in which groundwater is regulated by state law. Residents in the watershed depend almost exclusively on groundwater, a resource now being mined at rates in excess of recharge. A host of environmental issues - including threats to local water security and to the baseflow of one of the few remaining perennial streams in Arizona - have catalyzed a variety of civil society groups across the region in seeking to stop, control, or mitigate scaled impacts of rapid exurbanization and groundwater exploitation in the PrAMA. Based on in-depth interviews, public fora transcripts, government and civil society group documents, media accounts, and scientific reports, we examine competing discourses about water and scalar politics of key citizen groups, government actors, and development interests. Through this analysis, we examine the socio-spatial construction of claims and counter-claims of environmental harms of groundwater development. The paper contributes to recent discussions of scalar politics in geography by highlighting the importance of environmental governance disputes over water resources using a First World case study.

AB - This paper engages recent discussions about the politics of scale to examine emerging place-based conflicts over water resources in Arizona. Our focus is on the 14,247 sq km Verde River watershed in Arizona's Central Highlands, a region that contains the Prescott Active Management Area (PrAMA), one of five zones in the state in which groundwater is regulated by state law. Residents in the watershed depend almost exclusively on groundwater, a resource now being mined at rates in excess of recharge. A host of environmental issues - including threats to local water security and to the baseflow of one of the few remaining perennial streams in Arizona - have catalyzed a variety of civil society groups across the region in seeking to stop, control, or mitigate scaled impacts of rapid exurbanization and groundwater exploitation in the PrAMA. Based on in-depth interviews, public fora transcripts, government and civil society group documents, media accounts, and scientific reports, we examine competing discourses about water and scalar politics of key citizen groups, government actors, and development interests. Through this analysis, we examine the socio-spatial construction of claims and counter-claims of environmental harms of groundwater development. The paper contributes to recent discussions of scalar politics in geography by highlighting the importance of environmental governance disputes over water resources using a First World case study.

KW - Arizona

KW - Environmental conflict

KW - Groundwater

KW - Political ecology

KW - Politics of scale

KW - Spatial fix

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42649139890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42649139890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.02.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:42649139890

VL - 39

SP - 1494

EP - 1511

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

IS - 3

ER -