Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor

Sharon I. Kirkpatrick, Jill Reedy, Lisa L. Kahle, Jennifer L. Harris, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati, Susan M. Krebs-Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate five popular fast-food chains' menus in relation to dietary guidance. Design: Menus posted on chains' websites were coded using the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and MyPyramid Equivalents Database to enable Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) scores to be assigned. Dollar or value and kids' menus and sets of items promoted as healthy or nutritious were also assessed. Setting: Five popular fast-food chains in the USA. Subjects Not applicable. Results Full menus scored lower than 50 out of 100 possible points on the HEI-2005. Scores for Total Fruit, Whole Grains and Sodium were particularly dismal. Compared with full menus, scores on dollar or value menus were 3 points higher on average, whereas kids' menus scored 10 points higher on average. Three chains marketed subsets of items as healthy or nutritious; these scored 17 points higher on average compared with the full menus. No menu or subset of menu items received a score higher than 72 out of 100 points. Conclusions: The poor quality of fast-food menus is a concern in light of increasing away-from-home eating, aggressive marketing to children and minorities, and the tendency for fast-food restaurants to be located in low-income and minority areas. The addition of fruits, vegetables and legumes; replacement of refined with whole grains; and reformulation of offerings high in sodium, solid fats and added sugars are potential strategies to improve fast-food offerings. The HEI may be a useful metric for ongoing monitoring of fast-food menus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)924-931
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Fast Foods
Food Chain
Fruit
Sodium
Databases
Food
Restaurants
Marketing
Fabaceae
Vegetables
Eating
Fats

Keywords

  • Dietary guidance
  • Dietary quality
  • Fast food
  • Food environment
  • Healthy Eating Index-2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Kirkpatrick, S. I., Reedy, J., Kahle, L. L., Harris, J. L., Ohri-Vachaspati, P., & Krebs-Smith, S. M. (2014). Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor. Public Health Nutrition, 17(4), 924-931. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012005563

Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor. / Kirkpatrick, Sharon I.; Reedy, Jill; Kahle, Lisa L.; Harris, Jennifer L.; Ohri-Vachaspati, Punam; Krebs-Smith, Susan M.

In: Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2014, p. 924-931.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kirkpatrick, SI, Reedy, J, Kahle, LL, Harris, JL, Ohri-Vachaspati, P & Krebs-Smith, SM 2014, 'Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor', Public Health Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 924-931. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012005563
Kirkpatrick, Sharon I. ; Reedy, Jill ; Kahle, Lisa L. ; Harris, Jennifer L. ; Ohri-Vachaspati, Punam ; Krebs-Smith, Susan M. / Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor. In: Public Health Nutrition. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 924-931.
@article{d8afb8bc7de34ebb95e99060e3cdd099,
title = "Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate five popular fast-food chains' menus in relation to dietary guidance. Design: Menus posted on chains' websites were coded using the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and MyPyramid Equivalents Database to enable Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) scores to be assigned. Dollar or value and kids' menus and sets of items promoted as healthy or nutritious were also assessed. Setting: Five popular fast-food chains in the USA. Subjects Not applicable. Results Full menus scored lower than 50 out of 100 possible points on the HEI-2005. Scores for Total Fruit, Whole Grains and Sodium were particularly dismal. Compared with full menus, scores on dollar or value menus were 3 points higher on average, whereas kids' menus scored 10 points higher on average. Three chains marketed subsets of items as healthy or nutritious; these scored 17 points higher on average compared with the full menus. No menu or subset of menu items received a score higher than 72 out of 100 points. Conclusions: The poor quality of fast-food menus is a concern in light of increasing away-from-home eating, aggressive marketing to children and minorities, and the tendency for fast-food restaurants to be located in low-income and minority areas. The addition of fruits, vegetables and legumes; replacement of refined with whole grains; and reformulation of offerings high in sodium, solid fats and added sugars are potential strategies to improve fast-food offerings. The HEI may be a useful metric for ongoing monitoring of fast-food menus.",
keywords = "Dietary guidance, Dietary quality, Fast food, Food environment, Healthy Eating Index-2005",
author = "Kirkpatrick, {Sharon I.} and Jill Reedy and Kahle, {Lisa L.} and Harris, {Jennifer L.} and Punam Ohri-Vachaspati and Krebs-Smith, {Susan M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980012005563",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "924--931",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor

AU - Kirkpatrick, Sharon I.

AU - Reedy, Jill

AU - Kahle, Lisa L.

AU - Harris, Jennifer L.

AU - Ohri-Vachaspati, Punam

AU - Krebs-Smith, Susan M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To evaluate five popular fast-food chains' menus in relation to dietary guidance. Design: Menus posted on chains' websites were coded using the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and MyPyramid Equivalents Database to enable Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) scores to be assigned. Dollar or value and kids' menus and sets of items promoted as healthy or nutritious were also assessed. Setting: Five popular fast-food chains in the USA. Subjects Not applicable. Results Full menus scored lower than 50 out of 100 possible points on the HEI-2005. Scores for Total Fruit, Whole Grains and Sodium were particularly dismal. Compared with full menus, scores on dollar or value menus were 3 points higher on average, whereas kids' menus scored 10 points higher on average. Three chains marketed subsets of items as healthy or nutritious; these scored 17 points higher on average compared with the full menus. No menu or subset of menu items received a score higher than 72 out of 100 points. Conclusions: The poor quality of fast-food menus is a concern in light of increasing away-from-home eating, aggressive marketing to children and minorities, and the tendency for fast-food restaurants to be located in low-income and minority areas. The addition of fruits, vegetables and legumes; replacement of refined with whole grains; and reformulation of offerings high in sodium, solid fats and added sugars are potential strategies to improve fast-food offerings. The HEI may be a useful metric for ongoing monitoring of fast-food menus.

AB - Objective: To evaluate five popular fast-food chains' menus in relation to dietary guidance. Design: Menus posted on chains' websites were coded using the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and MyPyramid Equivalents Database to enable Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) scores to be assigned. Dollar or value and kids' menus and sets of items promoted as healthy or nutritious were also assessed. Setting: Five popular fast-food chains in the USA. Subjects Not applicable. Results Full menus scored lower than 50 out of 100 possible points on the HEI-2005. Scores for Total Fruit, Whole Grains and Sodium were particularly dismal. Compared with full menus, scores on dollar or value menus were 3 points higher on average, whereas kids' menus scored 10 points higher on average. Three chains marketed subsets of items as healthy or nutritious; these scored 17 points higher on average compared with the full menus. No menu or subset of menu items received a score higher than 72 out of 100 points. Conclusions: The poor quality of fast-food menus is a concern in light of increasing away-from-home eating, aggressive marketing to children and minorities, and the tendency for fast-food restaurants to be located in low-income and minority areas. The addition of fruits, vegetables and legumes; replacement of refined with whole grains; and reformulation of offerings high in sodium, solid fats and added sugars are potential strategies to improve fast-food offerings. The HEI may be a useful metric for ongoing monitoring of fast-food menus.

KW - Dietary guidance

KW - Dietary quality

KW - Fast food

KW - Food environment

KW - Healthy Eating Index-2005

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903739550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903739550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1368980012005563

DO - 10.1017/S1368980012005563

M3 - Article

C2 - 23317511

AN - SCOPUS:84903739550

VL - 17

SP - 924

EP - 931

JO - Public Health Nutrition

JF - Public Health Nutrition

SN - 1368-9800

IS - 4

ER -