Family interaction: A process model of deviancy training

G. R. Patterson, T. J. Dishion, L. Bank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

236 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A model was present describing the reciprocal influence of disruptions in parent discipline practices on irritable exchanges between the target child and other family members. Disrupted parent discipline and irritable microsocial exchanges within the family were hypothesized to provide a basic training for aggression that generalizes to other settings such that the child is identified by peers, teachers, and parents as physically aggressive. Physical fighting was thought to lead to rejection by the normal peer group, which was hypothesized to feed back to further exacerbate fighting. Multilevel assessment including interview, questionnaires, laboratory studies, and home observations were carried out with the families of 91 preadolescent and adolescent boys. Nine indicators from the assessment battery were used to define the constructs Inept Parental Discipline, Negative Microsocial Exchanges, Physical Fighting, and Poor Peer relations. Structural equations (LISREL VI) were used to describe the relations among the constructs. The t values for the path coefficients were significant. A chi-square analysis showed an acceptable fit between the model and the empirical findings. The findings were interpreted as being consistent with the hypothesis that under certain circumstances, family interaction may serve as basic training for aggression. In the present study, interactions with siblings in the home seemed to severe a pivotal role.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-267
Number of pages15
JournalAggressive Behavior
Volume10
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aggression
Peer Group
Siblings
Parents
Interviews
Deviancy
Family Interaction
Process Model
Peers
Physical
Interaction
Battery
Disruption
Boys
Preadolescents
Structural Equations
Laboratory Studies
Questionnaire
Rejection
Rejection (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Bank, L. (1984). Family interaction: A process model of deviancy training. Aggressive Behavior, 10(3), 253-267.

Family interaction : A process model of deviancy training. / Patterson, G. R.; Dishion, T. J.; Bank, L.

In: Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1984, p. 253-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patterson, GR, Dishion, TJ & Bank, L 1984, 'Family interaction: A process model of deviancy training', Aggressive Behavior, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 253-267.
Patterson GR, Dishion TJ, Bank L. Family interaction: A process model of deviancy training. Aggressive Behavior. 1984;10(3):253-267.
Patterson, G. R. ; Dishion, T. J. ; Bank, L. / Family interaction : A process model of deviancy training. In: Aggressive Behavior. 1984 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 253-267.
@article{a39abdc495514a43a9d236672fe82d32,
title = "Family interaction: A process model of deviancy training",
abstract = "A model was present describing the reciprocal influence of disruptions in parent discipline practices on irritable exchanges between the target child and other family members. Disrupted parent discipline and irritable microsocial exchanges within the family were hypothesized to provide a basic training for aggression that generalizes to other settings such that the child is identified by peers, teachers, and parents as physically aggressive. Physical fighting was thought to lead to rejection by the normal peer group, which was hypothesized to feed back to further exacerbate fighting. Multilevel assessment including interview, questionnaires, laboratory studies, and home observations were carried out with the families of 91 preadolescent and adolescent boys. Nine indicators from the assessment battery were used to define the constructs Inept Parental Discipline, Negative Microsocial Exchanges, Physical Fighting, and Poor Peer relations. Structural equations (LISREL VI) were used to describe the relations among the constructs. The t values for the path coefficients were significant. A chi-square analysis showed an acceptable fit between the model and the empirical findings. The findings were interpreted as being consistent with the hypothesis that under certain circumstances, family interaction may serve as basic training for aggression. In the present study, interactions with siblings in the home seemed to severe a pivotal role.",
author = "Patterson, {G. R.} and Dishion, {T. J.} and L. Bank",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "253--267",
journal = "Aggressive Behavior",
issn = "0096-140X",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family interaction

T2 - A process model of deviancy training

AU - Patterson, G. R.

AU - Dishion, T. J.

AU - Bank, L.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - A model was present describing the reciprocal influence of disruptions in parent discipline practices on irritable exchanges between the target child and other family members. Disrupted parent discipline and irritable microsocial exchanges within the family were hypothesized to provide a basic training for aggression that generalizes to other settings such that the child is identified by peers, teachers, and parents as physically aggressive. Physical fighting was thought to lead to rejection by the normal peer group, which was hypothesized to feed back to further exacerbate fighting. Multilevel assessment including interview, questionnaires, laboratory studies, and home observations were carried out with the families of 91 preadolescent and adolescent boys. Nine indicators from the assessment battery were used to define the constructs Inept Parental Discipline, Negative Microsocial Exchanges, Physical Fighting, and Poor Peer relations. Structural equations (LISREL VI) were used to describe the relations among the constructs. The t values for the path coefficients were significant. A chi-square analysis showed an acceptable fit between the model and the empirical findings. The findings were interpreted as being consistent with the hypothesis that under certain circumstances, family interaction may serve as basic training for aggression. In the present study, interactions with siblings in the home seemed to severe a pivotal role.

AB - A model was present describing the reciprocal influence of disruptions in parent discipline practices on irritable exchanges between the target child and other family members. Disrupted parent discipline and irritable microsocial exchanges within the family were hypothesized to provide a basic training for aggression that generalizes to other settings such that the child is identified by peers, teachers, and parents as physically aggressive. Physical fighting was thought to lead to rejection by the normal peer group, which was hypothesized to feed back to further exacerbate fighting. Multilevel assessment including interview, questionnaires, laboratory studies, and home observations were carried out with the families of 91 preadolescent and adolescent boys. Nine indicators from the assessment battery were used to define the constructs Inept Parental Discipline, Negative Microsocial Exchanges, Physical Fighting, and Poor Peer relations. Structural equations (LISREL VI) were used to describe the relations among the constructs. The t values for the path coefficients were significant. A chi-square analysis showed an acceptable fit between the model and the empirical findings. The findings were interpreted as being consistent with the hypothesis that under certain circumstances, family interaction may serve as basic training for aggression. In the present study, interactions with siblings in the home seemed to severe a pivotal role.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021685515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021685515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0021685515

VL - 10

SP - 253

EP - 267

JO - Aggressive Behavior

JF - Aggressive Behavior

SN - 0096-140X

IS - 3

ER -