Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos

Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Karen Steinhauser, Emily Namey, James A. Tulsky, Robert Cook-Deegan, Jeremy Sugarman, David Walmer, Ruth Faden, Edward Wallach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe factors that affect infertility patients' decision making regarding their cryopreserved embryos. Design: Forty-six semistructured in-depth interviews of individuals and couples participating in IVF programs. Setting: Two major southeastern academic medical centers. Patient(s): Fifty-three individuals, including 31 women, 8 men, and 7 couples. Main Outcome Measure(s): Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts. Intervention (s): None. Result(s): Seven broad themes informed participants' decisions about embryo disposition: family and personal issues, trust, definition of the embryo, prospective responsibility to the embryo, responsibility to society, adequacy of information, and lack of acceptable disposition options. Many wished for alternative options, such as a ceremony at the time of disposal or placement of embryos in the woman's body when pregnancy was unlikely. Conclusion(s): Recent debates regarding embryo disposition do not reflect the range of values that infertility patients consider when deciding about frozen embryos. In addition to questions about the embryo's moral status, decision making about embryos is informed by a range of factors in the lives of individuals who created them. These perspectives may have important implications for the content and timing of informed consent, facilitating embryo disposition, and advancing policy debates about the ethics of frozen embryo use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1623-1630
Number of pages8
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume85
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Embryo Disposition
Infertility
Embryonic Structures
Decision Making
Interviews
Informed Consent
Ethics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Cryopreserved embryos
  • embryo disposition
  • embryo donation
  • embryo research
  • informed consent
  • interviews
  • qualitative research
  • stem cell research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Lyerly, A. D., Steinhauser, K., Namey, E., Tulsky, J. A., Cook-Deegan, R., Sugarman, J., ... Wallach, E. (2006). Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 85(6), 1623-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056

Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. / Lyerly, Anne Drapkin; Steinhauser, Karen; Namey, Emily; Tulsky, James A.; Cook-Deegan, Robert; Sugarman, Jeremy; Walmer, David; Faden, Ruth; Wallach, Edward.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 85, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 1623-1630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lyerly, AD, Steinhauser, K, Namey, E, Tulsky, JA, Cook-Deegan, R, Sugarman, J, Walmer, D, Faden, R & Wallach, E 2006, 'Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos', Fertility and Sterility, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1623-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056
Lyerly, Anne Drapkin ; Steinhauser, Karen ; Namey, Emily ; Tulsky, James A. ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Sugarman, Jeremy ; Walmer, David ; Faden, Ruth ; Wallach, Edward. / Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2006 ; Vol. 85, No. 6. pp. 1623-1630.
@article{822a2603d4d24274a864802656f258dc,
title = "Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos",
abstract = "Objective: To describe factors that affect infertility patients' decision making regarding their cryopreserved embryos. Design: Forty-six semistructured in-depth interviews of individuals and couples participating in IVF programs. Setting: Two major southeastern academic medical centers. Patient(s): Fifty-three individuals, including 31 women, 8 men, and 7 couples. Main Outcome Measure(s): Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts. Intervention (s): None. Result(s): Seven broad themes informed participants' decisions about embryo disposition: family and personal issues, trust, definition of the embryo, prospective responsibility to the embryo, responsibility to society, adequacy of information, and lack of acceptable disposition options. Many wished for alternative options, such as a ceremony at the time of disposal or placement of embryos in the woman's body when pregnancy was unlikely. Conclusion(s): Recent debates regarding embryo disposition do not reflect the range of values that infertility patients consider when deciding about frozen embryos. In addition to questions about the embryo's moral status, decision making about embryos is informed by a range of factors in the lives of individuals who created them. These perspectives may have important implications for the content and timing of informed consent, facilitating embryo disposition, and advancing policy debates about the ethics of frozen embryo use.",
keywords = "Cryopreserved embryos, embryo disposition, embryo donation, embryo research, informed consent, interviews, qualitative research, stem cell research",
author = "Lyerly, {Anne Drapkin} and Karen Steinhauser and Emily Namey and Tulsky, {James A.} and Robert Cook-Deegan and Jeremy Sugarman and David Walmer and Ruth Faden and Edward Wallach",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1623--1630",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos

AU - Lyerly, Anne Drapkin

AU - Steinhauser, Karen

AU - Namey, Emily

AU - Tulsky, James A.

AU - Cook-Deegan, Robert

AU - Sugarman, Jeremy

AU - Walmer, David

AU - Faden, Ruth

AU - Wallach, Edward

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Objective: To describe factors that affect infertility patients' decision making regarding their cryopreserved embryos. Design: Forty-six semistructured in-depth interviews of individuals and couples participating in IVF programs. Setting: Two major southeastern academic medical centers. Patient(s): Fifty-three individuals, including 31 women, 8 men, and 7 couples. Main Outcome Measure(s): Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts. Intervention (s): None. Result(s): Seven broad themes informed participants' decisions about embryo disposition: family and personal issues, trust, definition of the embryo, prospective responsibility to the embryo, responsibility to society, adequacy of information, and lack of acceptable disposition options. Many wished for alternative options, such as a ceremony at the time of disposal or placement of embryos in the woman's body when pregnancy was unlikely. Conclusion(s): Recent debates regarding embryo disposition do not reflect the range of values that infertility patients consider when deciding about frozen embryos. In addition to questions about the embryo's moral status, decision making about embryos is informed by a range of factors in the lives of individuals who created them. These perspectives may have important implications for the content and timing of informed consent, facilitating embryo disposition, and advancing policy debates about the ethics of frozen embryo use.

AB - Objective: To describe factors that affect infertility patients' decision making regarding their cryopreserved embryos. Design: Forty-six semistructured in-depth interviews of individuals and couples participating in IVF programs. Setting: Two major southeastern academic medical centers. Patient(s): Fifty-three individuals, including 31 women, 8 men, and 7 couples. Main Outcome Measure(s): Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts. Intervention (s): None. Result(s): Seven broad themes informed participants' decisions about embryo disposition: family and personal issues, trust, definition of the embryo, prospective responsibility to the embryo, responsibility to society, adequacy of information, and lack of acceptable disposition options. Many wished for alternative options, such as a ceremony at the time of disposal or placement of embryos in the woman's body when pregnancy was unlikely. Conclusion(s): Recent debates regarding embryo disposition do not reflect the range of values that infertility patients consider when deciding about frozen embryos. In addition to questions about the embryo's moral status, decision making about embryos is informed by a range of factors in the lives of individuals who created them. These perspectives may have important implications for the content and timing of informed consent, facilitating embryo disposition, and advancing policy debates about the ethics of frozen embryo use.

KW - Cryopreserved embryos

KW - embryo disposition

KW - embryo donation

KW - embryo research

KW - informed consent

KW - interviews

KW - qualitative research

KW - stem cell research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744516783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744516783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056

M3 - Article

C2 - 16678178

AN - SCOPUS:33744516783

VL - 85

SP - 1623

EP - 1630

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 6

ER -