Factors related to partner involvement in Development of the US National Physical activity plan

Daniel B. Bornstein, Cheryl Carnoske, Rachel Tabak, Jay Maddock, Steven P. Hooker, Kelly R. Evenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT:: Physical activity coalitions are increasingly forming to meet the demands associated with policy, systems, and environmental change necessary to realize increases in population levels of physical activity. Little is known about what makes physical activity coalitions successful; however, evidence from community-based coalitions in other public health domains suggests that factors related to each organization that joins a coalition may explain coalition success or failure. OBJECTIVE:: The objective of this study was to employ qualitative methods to understand the factors related to organizations' decisions to join and remain committed to the coalition that developed and launched the US National Physical Activity Plan (NPAP). DESIGN/SETTING:: Qualitative semistructured phone interviews were conducted with key informants from the NPAP coalition's partner organizations. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded separately by members of the research team. PARTICIPANTS:: Fourteen individuals representing 13 NPAP partner organizations participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Analysis focused on key factors explaining why and how partner organizations decided to join and remain committed to the NPAP coalition. RESULTS:: Five primary factors emerged: (1) strategic alignment, (2) organizational alignment, (3) provide input, (4) seminal event, and (5) cost/benefit ratio. CONCLUSIONS:: Building and maintaining a physical activity coalition with highly committed partners may hinge upon the ability to fully understand how each current or prospective partner perceives it could benefit from strategic alignment with the coalition, aligning with other organizations involved with the coalition, having input with the coalition's activities, participating in important events and products of the coalition, and realizing more overall advantages than disadvantages for participating in the coalition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume19
Issue number3 E-SUPPL
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Organizations
Environmental Policy
Interviews
Public Sector
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Public Health
Research
Population

Keywords

  • coalition
  • environment
  • evaluation
  • physical activity
  • policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Factors related to partner involvement in Development of the US National Physical activity plan. / Bornstein, Daniel B.; Carnoske, Cheryl; Tabak, Rachel; Maddock, Jay; Hooker, Steven P.; Evenson, Kelly R.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 3 E-SUPPL, 05.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bornstein, Daniel B. ; Carnoske, Cheryl ; Tabak, Rachel ; Maddock, Jay ; Hooker, Steven P. ; Evenson, Kelly R. / Factors related to partner involvement in Development of the US National Physical activity plan. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 3 E-SUPPL.
@article{99c34b0c86334194a810a77383dd25e3,
title = "Factors related to partner involvement in Development of the US National Physical activity plan",
abstract = "CONTEXT:: Physical activity coalitions are increasingly forming to meet the demands associated with policy, systems, and environmental change necessary to realize increases in population levels of physical activity. Little is known about what makes physical activity coalitions successful; however, evidence from community-based coalitions in other public health domains suggests that factors related to each organization that joins a coalition may explain coalition success or failure. OBJECTIVE:: The objective of this study was to employ qualitative methods to understand the factors related to organizations' decisions to join and remain committed to the coalition that developed and launched the US National Physical Activity Plan (NPAP). DESIGN/SETTING:: Qualitative semistructured phone interviews were conducted with key informants from the NPAP coalition's partner organizations. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded separately by members of the research team. PARTICIPANTS:: Fourteen individuals representing 13 NPAP partner organizations participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Analysis focused on key factors explaining why and how partner organizations decided to join and remain committed to the NPAP coalition. RESULTS:: Five primary factors emerged: (1) strategic alignment, (2) organizational alignment, (3) provide input, (4) seminal event, and (5) cost/benefit ratio. CONCLUSIONS:: Building and maintaining a physical activity coalition with highly committed partners may hinge upon the ability to fully understand how each current or prospective partner perceives it could benefit from strategic alignment with the coalition, aligning with other organizations involved with the coalition, having input with the coalition's activities, participating in important events and products of the coalition, and realizing more overall advantages than disadvantages for participating in the coalition.",
keywords = "coalition, environment, evaluation, physical activity, policy",
author = "Bornstein, {Daniel B.} and Cheryl Carnoske and Rachel Tabak and Jay Maddock and Hooker, {Steven P.} and Evenson, {Kelly R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e318284047d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3 E-SUPPL",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors related to partner involvement in Development of the US National Physical activity plan

AU - Bornstein, Daniel B.

AU - Carnoske, Cheryl

AU - Tabak, Rachel

AU - Maddock, Jay

AU - Hooker, Steven P.

AU - Evenson, Kelly R.

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - CONTEXT:: Physical activity coalitions are increasingly forming to meet the demands associated with policy, systems, and environmental change necessary to realize increases in population levels of physical activity. Little is known about what makes physical activity coalitions successful; however, evidence from community-based coalitions in other public health domains suggests that factors related to each organization that joins a coalition may explain coalition success or failure. OBJECTIVE:: The objective of this study was to employ qualitative methods to understand the factors related to organizations' decisions to join and remain committed to the coalition that developed and launched the US National Physical Activity Plan (NPAP). DESIGN/SETTING:: Qualitative semistructured phone interviews were conducted with key informants from the NPAP coalition's partner organizations. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded separately by members of the research team. PARTICIPANTS:: Fourteen individuals representing 13 NPAP partner organizations participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Analysis focused on key factors explaining why and how partner organizations decided to join and remain committed to the NPAP coalition. RESULTS:: Five primary factors emerged: (1) strategic alignment, (2) organizational alignment, (3) provide input, (4) seminal event, and (5) cost/benefit ratio. CONCLUSIONS:: Building and maintaining a physical activity coalition with highly committed partners may hinge upon the ability to fully understand how each current or prospective partner perceives it could benefit from strategic alignment with the coalition, aligning with other organizations involved with the coalition, having input with the coalition's activities, participating in important events and products of the coalition, and realizing more overall advantages than disadvantages for participating in the coalition.

AB - CONTEXT:: Physical activity coalitions are increasingly forming to meet the demands associated with policy, systems, and environmental change necessary to realize increases in population levels of physical activity. Little is known about what makes physical activity coalitions successful; however, evidence from community-based coalitions in other public health domains suggests that factors related to each organization that joins a coalition may explain coalition success or failure. OBJECTIVE:: The objective of this study was to employ qualitative methods to understand the factors related to organizations' decisions to join and remain committed to the coalition that developed and launched the US National Physical Activity Plan (NPAP). DESIGN/SETTING:: Qualitative semistructured phone interviews were conducted with key informants from the NPAP coalition's partner organizations. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded separately by members of the research team. PARTICIPANTS:: Fourteen individuals representing 13 NPAP partner organizations participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Analysis focused on key factors explaining why and how partner organizations decided to join and remain committed to the NPAP coalition. RESULTS:: Five primary factors emerged: (1) strategic alignment, (2) organizational alignment, (3) provide input, (4) seminal event, and (5) cost/benefit ratio. CONCLUSIONS:: Building and maintaining a physical activity coalition with highly committed partners may hinge upon the ability to fully understand how each current or prospective partner perceives it could benefit from strategic alignment with the coalition, aligning with other organizations involved with the coalition, having input with the coalition's activities, participating in important events and products of the coalition, and realizing more overall advantages than disadvantages for participating in the coalition.

KW - coalition

KW - environment

KW - evaluation

KW - physical activity

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876181506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876181506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318284047d

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318284047d

M3 - Article

C2 - 23529060

AN - SCOPUS:84876181506

VL - 19

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 3 E-SUPPL

ER -